This article examines the phenomenon of the 'merger' of places of worship on the island nation-state of Singapore, and raises sociological questions regarding the rationale for such sharing of space for emergent styles of religiosity. The ethnographic material comes from two such cases of merger. involving Hindu and Taoist religious traditions in Singapore. These data allow us to abstract broader issues of conceptual relevance to the understanding of religion under conditions of modernity. My argument is that the practical requirement of merger in a shared physical location creates a literal and sym bolic space, as well as a context for interaction between individuals, communities and ultimately modes of religiosity. This context is both constraining and liberating at the same time, but I do not see modernity as eroding or diminishing religiosity. Rather, one observes that the formal rational, instrumental logic also facilitates innovations, inven tiveness and creativity in the religious domain, producing a vastly altered religious landscape. This challenges and impels us to move beyond a reductionist choice between the secularising or the sacralising effects of modernist forces on religious practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bell, Daniel.1977. The return of the sacred? The argument on the future of religion. British journal of sociology28, 4: 419-51.
2.
Benjamin, Geoffrey.1987. Notes on the deep sociology of religion. Working paper Series, No. 85, Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore.
3.
Berger, Peter.1969. The scared canopy. Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Anchor Books.
4.
Casanova, JosE.1994. Public religions in the modern worldChicago & London: The University of Chicago Press .
5.
Chua Beng Huat.1985. Pragmatism of the People's Action Party Government in Singapore: A Critical Assessment. Southeast Asian journal of social science13, 2: 29-46.
6.
—. 1995. Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore . London & New York: Routledge .
7.
Diehl, Carl Gustav.1956. Instrument and purpose: Studies on rites and rituals in South India. Lund: CWK Gleerup .
Durkheim, Emile.1912/1995. The elementary forms of religious life , translated and with an introduction by Karen E. Fields. New York: The Free Press.
10.
HAMMOND, PHILIP, ed. 1985. The sacred in a secular age. Toward revision in the scientific study of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Haynes, Jeff.1998. Religion in global politics. London & New York: Longman.
12.
Heelas, Paul.1996. The New Age movement. The celebration of the self and the secularization of modernity. Cambridge, Mass .: Blackwell.
13.
Hindu Endowments Board.2002. Chitrbanu Hindu Festivals. Singapore: Hindu Endowments Board.
14.
Ho, Serena Hwee Hua.1999. In search of permanent homes: Christian Churches and cultural politics of space. Unpublished Academic Exercise, Department of Geography, National University of Singapore.
15.
Jameson, Frederic.1991. Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of Late Capitalism . London & New York: Verso.
16.
Kong, Lily.1992. The sacred and the secular: Exploring contemporary meanings and values for religious buildings in Singapore. Southeast Asian journal of social science20, 1: 18-42.
17.
—. 1993a. Environment and planning. D: Society and Space11, 1: 23-45.
18.
—. 1993b. Negotiating conceptions of sacred space: A case study of religious buildings in Singapore. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers18: 342-58.
19.
—. 1999. Cemeteries and columbaria, memorials and mausoleums: Narrative and interpretation in the study of deathscapes in geography. Australian geographical studies37: 1-10.
20.
—. 2001. Mapping 'new' geographies of religion: Politics and poetics in modernity. Progress in human geography25, 2: 211-33.
21.
Lambert, Yves.1999. Religion in modernity as a new axial age: Secularisation or new religious forms?Sociology of religion60, 3: 303-33.
22.
Lim, William S.W. and Philip Motha.1979. Land policy in Singapore . Singapore: DP Architects.
MAHIZHNAN, ARUN and LEE TSAO YUAN, eds. 1998. Singapore. Re-engineering success. Institute of Policy Studies, Singapore: Oxford University Press.
25.
Martin, David.1990. Tongues of fire. The explosion of Protestantism in Latin America. Oxford & Cambridge, Mass .: Basil Blackwell.
26.
Marx, Karl.1848[1977]. The Communist manifesto. In David McLellan, ed., Karl Marx. Selected writings , pp. 20-48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
Marx, Karl and Frederich Engels.1958. Karl Marx and F. Engels on religion. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
28.
Master Plan.1998. Republic of Singapore, Singapore: Urban Redevelopment Authority.
29.
Mera, Michael Madan.1988. Urban planning in Singapore: An assessment of official plans. Unpublished Academic Exercise. Department of Geography, National University of Singapore.
30.
Mialaret, Jean-Pierre.1969. Hinduism in Singapore: A guide to the temples in Singapore . Singapore: Donald Moore .
31.
Nilavu, Mohd. Ali.1985. Hindu mother-goddess worship in modern Singapore: An ethnographic study. Unpublished Academic Exercise, Department of Sociology , National University of Singapore.
32.
Perry, Martin, Lily Kong and Brenda Yeoh.1997. Singapore: A developmental city state . New York: John Wiley and Sons.
33.
Purushotam, Nirmala Srirekam.1998. Negotiating language, constructing race: Disciplining difference in Singapore. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
34.
Rajah, Ananda.1975. The ecological study of shrines. Unpublished Academic Exercise, Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore.
35.
Singapore Census Of Population, 2000. Advance Data Release No. 2, Religion. Singapore : Singapore National Printers.
36.
Sinha, Vineeta.1987. Hinduism in Singapore: A sociological and ethnographic perspective. M.Soc.Sci Thesis, Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore.
37.
—. 1999. Constituting and re-constituting the religious domain in the modern nation-state of Singapore. In Kwok Kian Woon, Lily Kong, Kwa Chong Guan and Brenda Yeoh, eds, Our place in time: Exploring heritage and memory in Singapore, pp. 76-95. Singapore : Singapore Heritage Society.
38.
Tan, Hung Boon.1992. Singapore's land use policy 1959-1990. Unpublished Academic Exercise, Department of Economics and StatisticsNational University of Singapore.
39.
Tong, Chee Kiong and Lily Kong.2000. Religion and modernity: Ritual transformations and reconstruction of space and time. Social and cultural geography1, 1: 29-44.
40.
Turnbull, C.M.1982. A history of Singapore 1819-1975. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press .
41.
Warner, Stephen R.1993. Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States. American journal of sociology98, 5: 1044-93.
42.
Weber, Max.1904 [1985]. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of Capitalism. London: Unwin.
43.
Wee, Vivienne.1989. Secular state, multi-religious society: The patterning of religion in Singapore. Unpublished Manuscript.
44.
Wilson, Bryan.1976. Contemporary transformations of religion . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
45.
—. 1982. Religion in sociological perspective . Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
—. 1996. Religion in a secular society. A sociological comment . London: CA Watts.
47.
WOODHEAD, LINDA and PAUL HEELAS, eds. 2000. Religion in modern times. An interpretive anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
48.
Yamane, David.1997. Secularization on trial: In defense of a non-secularization paradigm. Journal for the scientific study of religion36, 1: 109-22.
49.
Yeoh, Brenda.2000. Historical geographies of the colonized world. In Brian Graham and Catherine Nash, eds, Modern historical geographies , pp. 146-66. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
50.
YUEN, BELINDA, ed. 1998. Planning Singapore: From plan to implementation . Singapore: Singapore Institute of Planners.
