This article presents a critique of a discourse, commonly found in anthropological and historical accounts, that stereotypes rural labour migrants as unreliable workers who are not yet fully committed to industrial work regimes and who keep prioritising rural responsibilities above industrial needs. Based on data collected in the garment industry of Tirupur, south India, it is shown that rural migrants can as well be conceived of by their urban employers as more committed and hardworking recruits than the so-called 'locals'. Employers' discourses of migrant workers are examined and four case histories of migrants are discussed to illustrate that labour commitment is not just the mechanical outcome of a long-standing familiarity with an industrial and modern life-style. Rather, the commitment of migrant workers has to be understood in relation to their expectations of and encounters with modernity, which for most migrants are shaped through ex periences of socio-economic and spatial mobility. Commitment can be expected to be high where rewards are substantial. The article engages with modernity both as a dis course about the nature of industrial employment and life-styles, and as a set of expectations and achievements which comprise the experiences of modernity for those involved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bhattacharya, U.K.1999. Clouds 'in the making' of an industrial district?: A note on 'the knitwear cluster of Tiruppur'. In A.K. Bagchi, ed., Economy and organization: Indian institutions under the neoliberal regime, pp. 122-46. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
2.
Breman, J.1985. Of peasants, migrants and paupers: Rural labour circulation and capitalist production in west India. Delhi : Oxford University Press.
3.
—. 1994. Wage hunters and gatherers. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
4.
—. 1996. Footloose labour: Working in India's informal economy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
—. 1999. The study of industrial labour in post-colonial India—The formal sector: An introductory review. In J.P. Parry, J. Breman and K. Kapadia, eds., The worlds of Indian industrial labour, pp. 1-42. New Delhi: Sage Publications .
6.
Cawthorne, P.1990. Amoebic capitalism as a form of accumulation: The case of the cotton knitwear industry in a south Indian town. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Milton Keynes: Open University .
7.
—. 1995. Of networks and markets: The rise and rise of a south Indian town, the example of Tiruppur's cotton knitwear industry. World development23, 1: 43-56.
Chanoavarkar. R.1994. The origins of industrial capitalism in India: Business strategies and the working classes in Bombay, 1900-1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Chari, S.2000a. The agrarian question comes to town: Making knitwear work in Tiruppur, south India. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Berkeley: University of California.
11.
—. 2000b. The agrarian origins of the knitwear industrial cluster in Tiruppur, India. World development28, 3: 579-99.
12.
De Haan, A.1994. Unsettled settlers: Migrant workers and industrial capitalism in Calcutta. Hilversum: Verloren .
13.
De Neve, G.1999a. Tamil warps and wefts: An anthropological study of urban weavers in south India. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
14.
—. 1999b. Asking for and giving baki: Neo-bondage, or the interplay of bondage and resistance in the Tamilnadu power-loom industry. In J.P. Parry, J. Breman and K. Kapadia, eds., The worlds of Indian industrial labour, pp. 379-406. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
15.
Ferguson, J.1999. Expectations of modernity: Myths and meanings of urban life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Gluckman, M.1961. Anthropological problems arising from the African industrial revolution. In A. Southall, ed., Social change in modern Africa, pp. 67-82. London : Oxford University Press.
17.
Holmström, M.1976. South Indian factory workers: Their life and their world . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
—. 1984. Industry and inequality: The social anthropology of Indian labour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Kapadia, K.1999. Gender ideologies and the formation of rural industrial classes in south India today. In J.P. Parry , J. Breman and K. Kapadia, eds., The worlds of Indian industrial labour , pp. 329-52. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
20.
Lambert, H.1996. Caste, gender and locality in rural Rajasthan. In C.J. Fuller, ed., Caste today , pp. 93-123. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
21.
—. 2000. Sentiment and substance in north Indian forms of relatedness . In J. Carsten, ed., Cultures of relatedness: New approaches to the study of kinship, pp. 73-89. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
22.
Lambert, R.D.1963. Workers, factories, and social change in India . New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
23.
Mayer, P.1961. Townsmen or tribesmen: Conservatism and the process of urbanization in a South African city. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Mills, M.B.1999a. Thai women in the global labor force: Consuming desires, contesting selves. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
25.
—. 1999b. Migrant labour takes a holiday: Reworking modernity and marginality in contemporary Thailand. Critique of anthropology19, 1: 31-51.
26.
Mitchell, J.C.1961. Wage labour and African population movements in Central Africa. In K.M. Barbour and R.M. Prothero, eds., Essays on African population , pp. 193-248. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
27.
—. 1966. Theoretical orientations in African urban studies . In M. Banton, eds., The social anthropology of complex societies, pp. 37-68. London: Tavistock.
28.
Moore, W.E. and A.S. Feldman.1960. Labor commitment and social change in developing areas. New York: Social Science Research Council.
29.
Morris, M.D.1960. The labour market in India. In W.E. Moore and A.S. Feldman , eds., Labor commitment and social change in developing areas, pp. 173-200. New York: Social Science Research Council.
30.
Morris, M.D.1965. The emergence of an industrial labor force in India: A study of the Bombay cotton mills, 1854-1947. Berkeley : University of California Press.
31.
Niehoff, A.1959. Factory workers in India. Milwaukee : Redtke Bros. & Kortsch Co.
32.
Ong, A.1987. Spirits of resistance and capitalist discipline: Factory women in Malaysia. New York: State University of New York Press.
33.
—. 1991. The gender and labor politics of postmodernity . Annual review of anthropology20: 279-309.
34.
Ornati, O.A.1955. Jobs and workers in India. Institute of International Industrial and Labour Relations, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
35.
Osella, F. and C. Osella.2000. Social mobility in Kerala: Modernity and identity in conflict. London: Pluto Press.
36.
Parry, J.P.1999. Lords of labour: Working and shirking in Bhilai . In J.P. Parry, J. Breman and K. Kapadia, eds., The worlds of Indian industrial labour, pp. 107-40. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
37.
Rofel, L.1999. Other modernities: Gendered yearnings in China after socialism . Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
Sen, S.1999. Women and labour in late colonial India: The Bengal jute industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Sheth, N.R.1968. The social framework of an Indian factory. Manchester: Manchester University Press .
40.
Shiva Rao, B.1939. The industrial worker in India. London : George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
41.
Singer, M.1971. Beyond tradition and modernity in Madras. Comparative studies in society and history13: 160-95.
42.
Swaminathan, P. and J. Jeyaranjan.1999. The knitwear cluster in Tiruppur: An Indian industrial district in the making? In A.K. Bagchi, ed., Economy and organization: Indian institutions under the neoliberal regime, pp. 94-121. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
