The article analyses the revolutionary impact of the processes of mechanical reproduction on artistic production and formation of modern identity in colonial India. Mechanical reproduction, with endless repeatability as its chief characteristic, turned India into an ‘iconic society’. It affected the elite as much as the underclass, as elite artists vied with artisans to capture the greatly expanding market in cheap prints. Mechanical reproduction arrived in India in two basic forms: as a source for European masterpieces for Indian artists to copy, and as inexpensive images available even to the poorest. Unlike in the West, the printed image in India rivalled painting, thereby challenging its aura of authenticity. As the pioneering printmaking firms, Calcutta Art and the Poona Chitrashala Press show, mechanical prints helped forge the Indian nation by creating a common visual culture. However, the very nature of mass reproduction itself contributed to the weakening and diluting of the monolithic character of elite nationalism.
BandopadhayaC. ed. 1981. Dui shatakar Bangla mudran oprakashan.Calcutta: Ananda Publishers.
5.
BarrellJ.1986. Political theory of painting from Reynolds to Hazlitt.New Haven: Yale University Press.
6.
BasuA.1974. The growth of education and political development in India, 1898-1920.Delhi: Oxford University Press.
7.
BaylyC.A.1996. Empire and information: Intelligence gathering and social communication in India, 1780-1870.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BeachM.C., and KochE., 1997. King of the world, the Padshahnama.London: Azimuth.
9.
BenjaminW.1970. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In BenjaminW., Illuminations, pp. 219–53. London: Fontana Collins.
10.
ChapekarD.1971. The making of a terrorist: From the autobiography of Damodar Hari Chapekar. In KedourieE., ed., Nationalism in Asia and Africa, pp. 398–461. London: Weidenfeld.
11.
ChatterjeeR.1899. To the Temple. The Kayastha Samachar. Allahabad, October-November, 1899 (cutting in the collection of the sculptor, Ganpatrao Mhatre).
12.
ChatterjiB.C.1992. Ananda Math (tr. B.C. Roy). New Delhi: Vision Books.
DasguptaU.1977. Rise of an Indian public: Impact of official policy, 1870-80.Calcutta: Rddhi.
16.
FrowJ. n.d. Signature and brand. In CollinsJim, ed., High-Pop.London: Blackwell (forthcoming).
17.
GreeleyR.A.2000. Painting Mexican identities: Nationalism and gender in the work of Maria Izquerdo.Oxford art journal23, 1: 51–72.
18.
Guha-ThakurtaT.1988. Artists, artisans and mass picture production in late 19th and early 20th century Calcutta.South Asia research8, 1: 3–46.
19.
Guha-ThakurtaT.1992. The making of a new ‘Indian’ art: Artists, aesthetics and nationalism in Bengal, c. 1850-1920.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HeimsathC.H.1964. Indian nationalism and Hindu social reform.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
IrwinJ., and HallM., 1971. Indian painted and printed fabrics in the Calico Museum.Ahmedabad: Calico Museum of Textiles.
23.
JainJ.1999. Kalighat painting: Images from a changing world.Ahmedabad: Mapin.
24.
KeerD.1959. Lokamanya Tilak: Father of our freedom struggle.Bombay: J.B. Kangutkar.
25.
KesavanB.S.1985-97. History of printing and publishing in India: A story of cultural awakening, 3 vols. New Delhi: National Book Trust.
26.
KonizkovaH.1975. The drawings of the Kalighat style.Prague: Naprstek Museum.
27.
LevinD.M. ed. 1993. Modernity and hegemony of vision.Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
McMurtrieD.C.1943. The book: The story of printing and bookmaking.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
MacaulayT.B.1958. Minute on education. In De BaryW.T., ed., Sources of Indian tradition, vol. 2, pp. 44–49. New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
MarshallJ., and FoucherA. n.d. The monuments of Sanchi, 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
MillerM.1997. Athens and Persia in the fifth century B.C.: A study in cultural receptivity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MitterP.1972. Rabindranath Tagore: A legend in his own time? In LagoM., and WarwickR., eds, Rabindranath Tagore: Perspectives in time, pp. 103–21. London: Macmillan.
33.
MitterP.1994. Art and nationalism in colonial India, 1850-1922: Occidental orientations.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
MitterP.2001. Indian art.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
PaulA. ed. 1983. Woodcut prints of 19th century India.Calcutta: Seagull Press.
36.
PinneyC.1997. The nation (un)pictured? Chromolithography and ‘popular’ politics in India, 1878-1995.Critical inquiry23, 4: 834–67.
37.
PinneyC.1999. Indian magical realism: Notes on popular visual culture. In BhadraG., and TharuS., eds, Subaltern studies X: Writings on South Asian history and society, pp. 201–25. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
38.
RayR.K.1979. Urban roots of Indian nationalism: Pressure groups and conflicts of interests in Calcutta city politics, 1875-1939.New Delhi: Vikas.
39.
ReisnerT.M., and GoldbergN.M., 1966. Tilak and the struggle for Indian freedom.New Delhi: Peoples Publishing House.
40.
RobinsonS.1969. A history of printed textiles.London: Studio Vista.
41.
RoyR.1958. Letter on education. In De BaryW.T., ed., Sources of Indian tradition, vol. 2, pp. 40–43. New York: Columbia University Press.
42.
SarkarS.1985. Notes on the Bengal renaissance.Calcutta: Papyrus.
43.
SealA.1968. The emergence of Indian nationalism.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
WittkowerR.1983. Selected lectures of Rudolf Wittkower (edited by ReynoldsD.M.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
