A retrospective study analyzing indications and outcomes of mid-trimester emergency cervical cerclage in a tertiary care perinatal centre over half a decade
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2022
A retrospective study analyzing indications and outcomes of mid-trimester emergency cervical cerclage in a tertiary care perinatal centre over half a decade
We studied the indications, success rate, perinatal outcomes and maternal complications following mid-trimester emergency cervical cerclage. All women undergoing mid-trimester emergency cerclage at our centre during 2014–2019 were included in this retrospective study.
There were 46 women in our cohort. Mean cervical length was 1.5 cm (SD ± 0.7), and 52.1% of them had bulging membranes. The mean gestational age at cerclage was 23.35 weeks (SD ± 3.341). Three were loss to follow up.
Out of 43 pregnancies (23 singletons and 20 twins) analyzed, 37/43, 86.4% had livebirths. Success rate in the singletons and twins were 91.3% and 80% respectively. Maternal complications were seen in 56.5% of patients. Composite neonatal morbidity was significantly more in the twin group (p-value 0.04).
Overall live birth rate was 86.4% with similar success rates in singleton and multiple pregnancies. Although, evidence for beneficial effect of prophylactic cerclage in multiple gestation is lacking, emergency cerclage may have a role in twin gestation.
American College of Obstericians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin. Cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol2003; 102: 1091–1099.
2.
FoxNSGelberSEKalishRB, et al.History-indicated cerclage: practice patterns of maternal-fetal medicine specialists in the USA. J Perinat Med2008; 36: 513–517.
3.
DebbyASadanOGlezermanM,et al.Favorable outcome following emergency second trimester cerclage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet2007; 96: 16–19.
4.
RandLNorwitzER. Current controversies in cervical cerclage. Semin Perinatol2003; 27: 73–85.
5.
CosteloeKHennessyEGibsonAT,et al.The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics2000; 106: 659–671.
6.
Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic1955; 52: 299–300. PubMed.
7.
McdonaldIA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp1957; 64: 346–350.
8.
VasudevaNReddingtonCBogdanskaM,et al.Emergency versus elective cervical cerclage: an audit of Our first Two years of service. BioMed Res Int2018; 2018: 5. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2065232.
9.
NelsonLDolaTTranT,et al.Pregnancy outcomes following placement of elective, urgent and emergent cerclage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med2009; 22: 269–273.
10.
DeFrancoEAValentAMNewmanT, et al.Adjunctive therapies to cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013; 2013. DOI: 10.1155/2013/528158.
Osemwenkha. Cervical cerclage in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: A review [Internet]. Niger J Surg Sci 2014; 24(1): 1–6 (accessed 24 November 2019).
13.
Feyi-WabosoPAUmezurikeCC. Management of cervical incompetence in Aba, south-eastern Nigeria. Niger J Med J Natl Assoc Resid Dr Niger2005; 14: 400–404.
14.
LeitichHBrunbauerMKaiderA,et al.Cervical length and dilatation of the internal cervical os detected by vaginal ultrasonography as markers for preterm delivery: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol1999; 181: 1465–1472.
15.
SatoYHidakaNNakanoT, et al.Efficacy of an emergency cervical cerclage using absorbable monofilament sutures. J Pregnancy2018; 2018.
16.
DaskalakisGPapantoniouNMesogitisS,et al.Management of cervical insufficiency and bulging fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol2006; 107: 221.
17.
LipitzSLibshitzAOelsnerG, et al.Outcome of second-trimester, emergency cervical cerclage in patients with no history of cervical incompetence. Am J Perinatol1996; 13: 419–422.
18.
YipS-KFungHYMFungT-Y. Emergency cervical cerclage: a study between duration of cerclage in situ with gestation at cerclage, herniation of forewater, and cervical dilatation at presentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol1998; 78: 63–67.
19.
ZhuL-QChenHChenL-B, et al.Effects of emergency cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcome: a retrospective study of 158 cases. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res2015 May 15; 21: 1395–1401.
20.
PrasadNNThampanSANagarathnammaR. Emergency cervical cerclage and pregnancy outcomes. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol2017; 6: 1993.
21.
CarusoATrivelliniCCAROLISSD,et al.Emergency cerclage in the presence of protruding membranes: is pregnancy outcome predictable?Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2000; 79: 265–268.
22.
VentoliniGGenrichTJRothJ,et al.Pregnancy outcome after placement of “rescue” shirodkar cerclage. J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc2009; 29: 276–279.
23.
LevinISalzerLMaslovitzS, et al.Outcomes of mid-trimester emergency cerclage in twin pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther2012; 32: 246–250.
24.
RebarberABenderSSilversteinM,et al.Outcomes of emergency or physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies compared to singleton pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2014; 173: 43–47.
25.
RafaelTJBerghellaVAlfirevicZ. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2014; (9): CD009166. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009166.pub2.
EhsanipoorRMSeligmanNSSacconeG, et al.Physical examination–indicated cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol2015; 126: 125–135.
28.
OlatunbosunOAAl-NuaimLTurnellRW. Emergency cerclage compared with bed rest for advanced cervical dilatation in pregnancy. Int Surg1995; 80: 170–174.
29.
KuonR-JHudallaHSeitzC, et al.Impaired neonatal outcome after emergency cerclage adds controversy to prolongation of pregnancy. PLOS ONE2015; 10: e0129104.
