GrimesDRHeathersJ. The new normal? Redaction bias in biomedical science. R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Dec 1;8(12):211308.
2.
MunafòMRDavey SmithG. Robust research needs many lines of evidence. Nature. 2018 Jan 25;553(7689):
399-401.
3.
GlasziouPPSandersSHoffmannT. Waste in covid-19 research. BMJ2020; 369:m1847.
4.
AgrawalVSharmaD. Initial advice to avoid Laparoscopic Surgery due to fear of COVID-19 virus transmission: Where was the evidence?Br J Surg. 2020 Sep;107(10):e418.
5.
MehraMRDesaiSSRuschitzkaF, et al. RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis. Lancet. 2020 May 22:S0140–6736(20)31180-6.
6.
RosenbaumL. No Cure without Care - Soothing Science Skepticism. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1462–1465.
7.
Van CalsterBWynantsLRileyRD, et al. Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:219–226.
8.
LawrenceJMMeyerowitz-KatzGHeathersJAJ, et al. The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable. Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):1853–1854.
9.
SmaldinoP. Better methods can't make up for mediocre theory. Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7781):9.
10.
NurseP. Biology must generate ideas as well as data. Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7876):305.
11.
JrKaelin WG. Publish houses of brick, not mansions of straw. Nature2017 May 23;545(7655):387.