BerenbaumMR. Impact factor impacts on early-career scientist careers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2019; 116: 16659–16662.
2.
RiceDBRaffoulHIoannidisJPA, et al.Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities. Br Med J2020; 369: m2081.
3.
MatthewsAHAbdelrahmanTPowellAG, et al.Surgical Education's 100 Most cited articles: a bibliometric analysis. J Surg Educ2016; 73: 919–929.
4.
WrafterPFConnellyTMKhanJ, et al.The 100 most influential manuscripts in colorectal cancer: a bibliometric analysis. Surgeon2016; 14: 327–336.
5.
EllulTBullockNAbdelrahmanT, et al.The 100 most cited manuscripts in emergency abdominal surgery: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Surg2017; 37: 29–35.
6.
BecerraAZAquinaCTHaydenDM, et al.The top 100 most disruptive publications in academic surgery journals: 1954–2014. Am J Surg2021; 221: 614–617.
7.
MoherDNaudetFCristeaIA, et al.Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLoS Biol2018; 16: e2004089.
8.
WoolstonC. Impact factor abandoned by Dutch university in hiring and promotion decisions. Nature2021; 595: 462.
9.
ChorusCWaltmanL. A large-scale analysis of impact factor biased journal self-citations. PLoS One2016; 11: e0161021.
10.
ChapmanCABicca-MarquesJCCalvignac-SpencerS, et al.Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h-index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia. Proc Biol Sci2019 Dec 4; 286: 20192047.
11.
Aubert BonnNPinxtenW. Advancing science or advancing careers? Researchers’ opinions on success indicators. PLoS One2021; 16: e0243664.
12.
SoreideK. Emergency general surgery - is there any value in a ‘100 most cited’ list?Int J Surg2019; 64: 52–53.
13.
PowellAGMTBevanVBrownC, et al.Altmetric versus bibliometric perspective regarding publication impact and force. World J Surg2018; 42: 2745–2756.
14.
van den BesselaarPSandströmU. Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: a proposal for a new performance indicator. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0202712.
15.
The Lancet Global Health. Global health 2021: who tells the story?Lancet Glob Health2021; 9: e99.
16.
SharmaD. A call for reforms in global health publications. Lancet Global Health2021; 9: e901–e902.
17.
SharmaDCottonM. Editorial: a call for GLOCAL guidelines for global health. Trop Dr2021;51;285–287.
18.
MoherDBouterLKleinertS, et al.The Hong Kong principles for assessing researchers: fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol2020; 18: e3000737.
19.
AksnesDWLangfeldtLWoutersP. Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: an overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE open2019; 9.
