Does the choice of measure of occupational standing affect inferences about gender differences in occupational attainment? The authors use data from the 1994 General Social Survey and the 1986-1988 Survey of Income and Program Participation to analyze the role of gender in the process of occupational attainment 15 times, each time using a different measure of occupational standing. Composite indexes of occupational standing are too heterogeneous to be useful in studies of occupational stratification, especially studies of gender differences. Women often have higher levels of education than men in the same occupation, while the opposite is true for earnings. Thus, using a composite index, the relative standing of men's and women's occupations is an arbitrary function of the weights given to occupational education and earnings. It is preferable to index occupations separately by each of their socioeconomic characteristics, or to use other, more direct measures of occupational characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acker, Joan
. 1980. “Women and Stratification: A Review of Recent Literature.”Contemporary Sociology9:25-39.
2.
Bielby, William T.
and Denise Bielby. 1989. “Family Ties: Balancing Commitments to Work and Family in Dual Earner Households.”American Sociological Review54:776-789.
3.
Blishen, Bernard R.
and William K. Carroll. 1978. “Sex Differences in a Socioeconomic Index for Occupations in Canada.”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology15:352-371.
4.
Bose, Christine E.
1973. Jobs and Gender: Sex and Occupational Prestige. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Metropolitan Planning and Research.
5.
Bose, Christine E.
and Peter H. Rossi. 1983. “Prestige Standings of Occupations as Affected by Gender.”American Sociological Review48:316-330.
6.
Boyd, Monica
. 1982. “Sex Differences in the Canadian Occupational Attainment Process.”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology19:1-28.
7.
Boyd, Monica
. 1986. “Socioeconomic Indices and Sexual Inequality: A Tale of Scales.”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology23(4):457-480.
8.
Boyd, Monica
and Hugh A. McRoberts. 1982. “Women, Men, and Socioeconomic Indices: An Assessment.” Pp. 129-159 in Measures of Socioeconomic Status: Current Issues, edited by Mary G. Powers. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
9.
Chase, Ivan D.1975. “A Comparison of Men's and Women's Intergenerational Mobility in the United States.”American Sociological Review40:483-505.
10.
Cooney, Rosemary
, Santana Sokolove Clague, and Joseph J. Salvo. 1982. “Status Attainment of Young White Men and Women: Two Socioeconomic Measures.” Pp. 161-199 in Measures of Socioeconomic Status: Current Issues, edited by Mary G. Powers. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
11.
DeJong, Peter Y.
, Milton J. Brawer, and Stanley S. Robin. 1971. “Patterns of Female Intergenerational Occupational Mobility: A Comparison With Male Patterns of Intergenerational Occupational Mobility.”American Sociological Review36:1033-1042.
12.
Duncan, Otis Dudley
. 1961. “A Socioeconomic Index for All Occupations.” Pp. 109-138 in Occupations and Social Status, edited by Albert J. Reiss Jr.New York: Free Press.
13.
England, Paula
. 1979. “Women and Occupational Prestige: A Case of Vacuous Sex Equality.”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society5:252-265.
14.
Featherman, David L.
and Robert M. Hauser. 1976a. “Changes in the Socioeconomic Stratification of the Races, 1962-1973.”American Journal of Sociology82:621-651.
15.
Featherman, David L.
and Robert M. Hauser. 1976b. “Prestige or Socioeconomic Scales in the Study of Occupational Achievement?”Sociological Methods & Research4(4):403-422.
16.
Featherman, David L.
and Robert M. Hauser. 1978. Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.
17.
Featherman, David L.
, F. Lancaster Jones, and Robert M. Hauser. 1975. “Assumptions of Social Mobility Research in the U.S.: The Case of Occupational Status.”Social Science Research4:329-360.
18.
Featherman, David L.
and Gillian Stevens. 1982. “A Revised Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status: Application in Analysis of Sex Differences in Attainment.” Pp. 93-129 in Measures of Socioeconomic Status, edited by M. Powers. Boulder: Westview.
19.
Fligstein, Neil D.
and Wendy C. Wolf. 1978. “Sex Similarities in Occupational Status Attainment: Are the Results Due to the Restriction of the Sample to Women?”Social Science Research7:197-212.
20.
Fox, John
. 1991. Regression Diagnostics. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-079. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Friendly, Michael
. 1991. SAS System for Statistical Graphics. SAS Series in Statistical Applications. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
22.
Goldin, Claudia
. 1990. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Grusky, David B.
and Thomas A. DiPrete. 1990. “Recent Trends in the Process of Stratification.”Demography27(4):617-637.
24.
Hauser, Robert M.
and John Robert Warren. 1997. “Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status: A Review, Update, and Critique.” Pp. 177-298 in Sociological Methodology, edited by Adrian Raftery. Cambridge: Blackwell.
25.
Havens, Elizabeth
and Judy Corder Tully. 1972. “Female Intergenerational Occupational Mobility: Comparisons of Patterns?”American Sociological Review57:774-779.
26.
Hodge, Robert W.
, Paul M. Siegel, and Peter H. Rossi. 1964. “Occupational Prestige in the United States, 1925-63.”American Journal of Sociology70:286-302.
27.
Hout, Michael
. 1984a. “Status, Autonomy, and Training in Occupational Mobility.”American Journal of Sociology89:1379-1409.
28.
Hout, Michael
. 1984b. “Occupational Mobility of Black Men in the United States, 1962-1973.”American Sociological Review49:308-322.
29.
Hout, Michael
. 1988. “More Universalism, Less Structural Mobility: The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s.”American Journal of Sociology93(6):1358-1400.
30.
Hout, Michael
. 1996. “Speed Bumps on the Road to Meritocracy: Occupational Mobility of Women and Men in the United States, 1972-1994.” Working Paper. Berkeley, CA: Survey Research Center.
31.
Huber, Joan
. 1980. “Ransacking Mobility Tables.”Contemporary Sociology9:5-8.
32.
Jacobs, Jerry A.1986. “Review of Jobs and Gender: A Study of Occupational Prestige by Christine Bose.”American Journal of Sociology92:481-482.
33.
Jacobs, Jerry A. and Brian Powell. 1987. “Women's Occupational Status: A Revised Metric for Comparing Men and Women.” University of Pennsylvania. Unpublished manuscript.
34.
Marini, Margaret Mooney
. 1980. “Sex Differences in the Process of Occupational Attainment: A Closer Look.”Social Science Research9:307-361.
35.
McClendon, McKee J.1976. “The Occupational Status Attainment Processes of Males and Females.”American Sociological Review41:52-64.
36.
McGuire, Gail M.
and Barbara Reskin. 1993. “Authority Hierarchies at Work: The Impacts of Race and Sex.”Gender & Society7:487-506.
37.
Mutchler, Jan E.
and Dudley L. Poston Jr.1983. “Do Females Necessarily Have the Same Occupational Status Scores as Males? A Conceptual and Empirical Examination of the Duncan Socioeconomic Status Index and Nam-Powers Occupational Status Scores.”Social Science Research13:363-392.
38.
Nakao, Keiko and Judith Treas. 1991. “Bringing Occupational Prestige Scores Up to Date: Construction and Evaluation of the New Scale.” Unpublished manuscript.
39.
Nakao, Keiko and Judith Treas
. 1994. “Updating Occupational Prestige and Socioeconomic Scores: How the New Measures Measure Up.” Pp. 1-72 in Sociological Methodology, 1994, edited by Peter Marsden. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
40.
Nam, Charles B.
1963. “Methodology and Scores of Socioeconomic Status.” Working Paper No. 15, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.
41.
Nam, Charles B.
and Mary G. Powers. 1983. The Socioeconomic Approach to Status Measurement (With a Guide to Occupational and Socioeconomic Status Scores). Houston: Cap and Gown Press.
42.
Nam, Charles B.
and E. Walter Terrie. 1988. “1980-Based Nam-Powers Occupational Status Scores.” Working Paper 88-48, Center for the Study of Population, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
43.
Nam, Charles B.
, E. Walter Terrie, and Carl P. Schmertmann. 1994. “Comparison of the 1980 Updated Duncan and Nam-Powers Occupational Scores.” Working Paper 94-112, Center for the Study of Population, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
44.
Pineo, Brian
and John Porter. 1967. “Occupational Prestige in Canada.”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology4:24-40.
45.
Powell, Brian
and Jerry Jacobs. 1984. “Gender Differences in the Evaluation of Prestige.”The Sociological Quarterly25:173-190.
46.
Powers, Mary G.
and Joan J. Holmberg. 1978. “Occupational Status Scores: Changes Introduced by the Inclusion of Women.”Demography15:183-204.
47.
Reiss, Albert J. Jr.
1961. Occupations and Social Status. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
48.
Reskin, Barbara
and Irene Padavic. 1994. Women and Men at Work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
49.
Reskin, Barbara
and Patricia Roos. 1992. “Jobs, Authority, and Earnings Among Managers: The Continuing Significance of Sex.”Work and Occupations19:342-365.
50.
Robinson, Robert V.
and Jonathan Kelley. 1979. “Class as Conceived by Marx and Dahrendorf: Effects on Income Inequality and Politics in the United States and Great Britain.”American Sociological Review44:38-58.
51.
Seibert, M. Therese
, Mark A. Fossett, and Dawn M. Baunach. 1997. “Trends in Male-Female Status Inequality, 1940-1990.”Social Science Research26:1-24.
52.
Sewell, William H.
, Robert M. Hauser, and Wendy C. Wolf. 1980. “Sex, Schooling and Occupational Status.”American Journal of Sociology86:551-583.
53.
Siegel, Paul M. 1971. “Prestige in the American Occupational Structure.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
54.
Stafford, M. Therese
and Mark A. Fossett. 1988. “Male-Female Occupational Inequality in Southern Nonmetropolitan Counties, 1960-1980.” Working Paper 10.09, University of Texas at Austin.
55.
Stafford, M. Therese
and Mark A. Fossett. 1991. “Measuring Occupational Sex Inequality Over Time Using Nam-Powers SES Scores.” Working Paper 12.01, University of Texas at Austin.
56.
Stevens, Gillian
and Joo Hyun Cho. 1985. “Socioeconomic Indexes and the New 1980 Census Occupational Classification Scheme.”Social Science Research14:74-168.
57.
Stevens, Gillian
and David L. Featherman. 1981. “A Revised Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status.”Social Science Research10(4):364-395.
58.
Suter, Larry E.
and Herman P. Miller. 1973. “Income Differences Between Men and Career Women.”American Journal of Sociology78:962-974.
59.
Sweet, James A.
1973. Women in the Labor Force. New York: Seminar.
60.
Treas, Judith
and Andrea Tyree. 1979. “Prestige Versus Socioeconomic Status in the Attainment Processes of American Men and Women.”Social Science Research8:201-221.
61.
Treiman, Donald J.1975. “Problems of Concept and Measurement in the Comparative Study of Occupational Mobility.”Social Science Research4:183-230.
62.
Treiman, Donald J.
1977. Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
63.
Treiman, Donald J.
and Kermit Terrell. 1975a. “The Process of Status Attainment in the United States and Great Britain.”American Journal of Sociology81:563-583.
64.
Treiman, Donald J.
and Kermit Terrell. 1975b. “Sex and the Process of Status Attainment: A Comparison of Working Women and Men.”American Sociological Review40:174-200.
65.
Tyree, Andrea
and Judith Treas. 1974. “The Occupational and Marital Mobility of Women.”American Sociological Review39:293-302.
66.
Williams, Christine L.
1995. Still a Man's World: Men Who Do “Women's Work.”Berkeley: University of California Press.
67.
Wolf, Wendy C.
and Neil D. Fligstein. 1979a. “Sexual Stratification: Differences in Power in the Work Setting.”Social Forces58:94-107.
68.
Wolf, Wendy C.
and Neil D. Fligstein. 1979b. “Sex and Authority in the Work Place.”American Sociological Review44:235-252.
