The authors propose some new log-bilinear models for the analysis of asymmetry in square contingency tables. In these models the logarithm of the expected frequency is split up into two parts: (a) a symmetric or a quasi-symmetric part, and (b) a skew-symmetric part. The skew-symmetric part is decomposed using the so-called Gower decomposition of skew-symmetric matrices. It is shown how graphical representations of this decomposition can simplify the interpretation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Becker, M. P.
and C. C. Clogg. 1989. “Analysis of Sets of Two-Way Contingency Tables Using Association Models.”Journal of the American Statistical Association83:142-156.
2.
Caussinus, H.1965. “Contribution a l'analyse statistique des tableaux de correlation.”Annales de la Faculte des sciences de l'Universite de tulouse29:77-182.
3.
Clogg, C. C.1982. “Using Association Models in Sociological Research: Some Examples.”American Journal of Sociology79:762-771.
4.
Constantine, A. G.
and J. C. Gower. 1978. “Graphical Representation of Asymmetric Matrices.”Applied Statistics27:297-304.
5.
Constantine, A. G.
and J. C. Gower. 1982. “Models for the Analysis of Interregional Migration.”Environment and Planning A14:477-497.
6.
de Soete, G.1984. “On the Validity of Luce's Similarity Choice Model for Confusion Data.”Psychologica Belgica24:83-86.
7.
Goodman, L. A.1979. “Simple Models for the Analysis of Association in Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories.”Journal of the American Statistical Association70:755-768.
8.
Goodman, L. A.1985. “The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered and/or Unordered Categories: Association Models, Correlation Models and Asymmetry Models for Contingency Tables With or Without Missing Entries.”Annals of Statistics13:10-69.
9.
Goodman, L. A.1991. “Measures, Models and Graphical Displays in the Analysis of Cross-Classified Data.”Journal of the American Statistical Association86:1085-1137.
10.
Gower, J. C.
1977. “The Analysis of Asymmetry and Orthogonality.” Pp. 109-123 in Recent Developments in Statistics, edited by J. R. Barra. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11.
Gower, J. C.
1980. “Problems in Interpreting Asymmetrical Chemical Relationships.” Pp. 399-409 in Chemosystematics: Principles and Practice, edited by F. A. Bisby, J. G. Vaughan, and C. A. Wright. New York: Academic Press.
12.
Haberman, S. J.1981. “Tests for Independence in Two-Way Contingency Tables Based on Canonical Correlation and on Linear-by-Linear Interaction.”Annals of Statistics9:1178-1186.
13.
Harshman, R. A.
1981. DEDICOM Multidimensional Analysis of Skew-Symmetric Data. Part I: Theory. Unpublished technical memorandum. New Jersey: Bell Laboratories.
14.
Sobel, M. E.
1988. “Some Models for the Multiway Contingency Table With a One-to-One Correspondence Among Categories.” Pp. 165-192 in Sociological Methodology, edited by C. C. Clogg. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
15.
Sobel, M. E.
, M. Hout, and O. D. Duncan. 1985. “Exchange, Structure and Symmetry in Occupational Mobility.”American Journal of Sociology91:359-372.
16.
Takane, Y.
and T. Shibayama. 1986. “Comparison of Models for Stimulus Recognition Data.” In Multidimensional Data Analysis, edited by J. de Leeuwet al.Leiden: D.S.W.O. Press.
17.
van der Heijden, P.G.M.
, A. de Falguerolles, and J. de Leeuw. 1989. “A Combined Approach to Contingency Table Analysis Using Correspondence Analysis and Loglinear Analysis.”Applied Statistics38:249-292.
18.
Wong, R. S.-K. 1989. Social Mobility in Industrial Societies: Towards an Understanding of Cross-National and Temporal Stability and Variability. Unpublished thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
19.
Xie, Y.1992. “The Log-Multiplicative Layer-Effect Model for Comparing Mobility Tables.”American Sociological Review57:380-395.
20.
Yamaguchi, K.1987. “Models for Comparing Mobility Tables: Toward Parsimony and Substance.”American Sociological Review52:482-494.
21.
Yamaguchi, K.
1990. “Some Models for the Analysis of Asymmetric Association in Square Contingency Tables With Ordered Categories.” In Sociological Methodology 1990, edited by P. Marsden. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
