Sexual Morality,Pro-Life Values,and Attitudes toward Abortion

Abstract

A simultaneous latent class analysis of survey data from 1978 and 1983 is used to clarify the current controversy over whether opposition to abortion reflects a conservative sexual morality or pro-life values. Results indicate that the “pro-life” and “pro-choice” dichotomy represents an incomplete characterization of the American public—a third group, characterized by a conservative sexual morality and opposition to discretionary abortion, but not to nondiscretionary abortion, must also be included in the classification. The evidence indicates that from 1978 to 1983 this sexually conservative group decreased from one-third to one-fourth of the U.S. adult population and that the “pro-choice” increased to approximately one-half of the population over the same period. The proportion of the population characterized as the “pro-life” class remained stable at approximately 1 of 4 over the same time period.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BAKER, R. K. , L. K. EPSTEIN , and R. D. FORTH (1981) “Matters of life and death: social, political, and religious correlates of attitudes on abortion.” Amer. Politics Q. 9: 89-102.

BLAKE, J. (1970) “Abortion and public opinion: the 1960-1970 decade.” Science 171: 540-549.

CLOGG, C. C. (1977) Unrestricted and Restricted Maximum Likelihood Latent Structure Analysis: A Manual for Users. Working Paper No. 1977-09. University Park: Pennsylvania State Univ.

CLOGG, C. C. (1981a) “New developments in latent structure analysis” (pp. 215-246) in D. M. Jackson and E. F. Borgatta (eds.) Factor Analysis and Measurement, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

CLOGG, C. C. (1981b) “Latent structure models of mobility.” Amer. J. of Sociology 86: 836-868.

CLOGG, C. C. and L. A. GOODMAN (1984) “Latent structure analysis of a set of multidimensional contingency tables.” J. of the Amer. Stat. Ass. 79: 762-771.

CLOGG, C. C. and L. A. GOODMAN (1985) “Simultaneous latent structure analysis in several groups,” in N. B. Tuma (ed.) Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

CLOGG, C. C. and D. O. SAWYER (1981) “A comparison of alternative models for analyzing the scalability of response patterns,” in S. Leinhardt (ed.) Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

COOMBS, M. W. and S. WELCH (1982) “Blacks, whites, and attitudes toward abortions.” Public Opinion Q. 46: 510-520.

10.

DAVIS, J. A. and T. W. SMITH (1984) General Social Surveys, 1972-1984: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

11.

GRANDBERG, D. (1978) “Pro-life or reflection of conservative ideology? An analysis of opposition to legalized abortion.” Sociology and Social Research 62: 414-429.

12.

HABERMAN, S. J. (1979) Analysis of Qualitative Data, Vol. 2. New York: Academic.

13.

HENRY, N. W. (1981) “Jacknifing measures of association.” Soc. Methods and Research 10: 233-240.

14.

JELEN, T. G. (1984) “Respect for life, sexual morality, and opposition to abortion.” Rev. of Religious Research 25: 220-231.

15.

LAZARSFELD, P. F. and N. W. HENRY (1968) Latent Structure Analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

16.

LUKER, K. (1984) Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

17.

MacINTOSH, W. A. and J. P. ALSTON (1977) “Acceptance of abortion among white Catholics and Protestants, 1962 and 1975.” J. for the Scientific Study of Religion 16: 295-303.

18.

MacINTOSH, W. A. , L. T. ALSON and J. P. ALSTON (1979) “The differential impact of religious preference and church attendance on attitudes toward religion.” Rev. of Religious Research 20: 195-213.

19.

McCUTCHEON, A. L. (1987) Latent Class Analysis. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

20.

MOOIJAART, A. (1982) “Latent structure analysis for categorical variables,” in K. G. Jöreskog and H. Wold (eds.) Systems Under Indirect Observation, Vol. 1 (pp. 1-18). New York: North-Holland.

21.

PETERSEN, L. R. and A. L. MAUSS (1976) “Religion and the `Right to Life': correlates of opposition to abortion.” Soc. Analysis 37: 243-254.

22.

SAWYER, D. O. (1982) “Public attitudes toward life and death.” Public Opinion Q. 46: 521-533.

23.

SHOCKEY, J. (forthcoming) “Latent class analysis: an introduction to discrete data models with unobserved variables,” in J. S. Long (ed.) Common Problems in Quantitative Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

24.

SINGH, B. K. and P. J. LEAHY (1978) “Contextual and ideological dimensions of attitudes toward discretionary abortions.” Demography 15: 381-388.

25.

TEDROW, L. M. and E. R. MAHONEY (1979) “Trends in attitudes toward abortion: 1972-1976.” Public Opinion Q. 43: 181-189.

26.

WESTOFF, C. F. , E. C. MOORE , and N. B. RYDER (1969) “The structure of attitudes toward abortion.” Milbank Memorial Fund Q. 47: 11-37.