This article discusses total indirect effects in linear structural equation models. First, I define these effects. Second, I show how the delta method may be used to obtain the standard errors of the sample estimates of these effects and test hypotheses about the magnitudes of the indirect effects. To keep matters simple, I focus throughout on a particularly simple linear structural equation system; for a treatment of the general case, see Sobel (1986). To illustrate the ideas and results, a detailed example is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALWIN, D. F.
and R. M. HAUSER (1975) “The decomposition of effects in path analysis.”Amer. Soc. Rev.40: 37-47.
2.
BENTLER, P. M.
(1986) “Structural modeling and Psychometrika: An historical perspective on growth and achievements.”Psychometrika51: 35-51.
3.
BIELBY, W. T.
and R. M. HAUSER (1977) “Structural equation models.”Annual Rev. of Sociology3: 137-161.
4.
BISHOP, Y. M.
, S. FIENBERG, and P. W. HOLLAND (1975) Discrete Multivariate Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
COX, D. R.
and D. HINKLEY (1974) Theoretical Statistics. London: Chapman & Hall.
6.
DUNCAN, O. D.
, D. L. FEATHERMAN, and B. DUNCAN (1972) Socioeconomic Background and Achievement. New York: Seminar.
7.
FREEMAN, E. H., Jr. (1982) “The implementation of effect decomposition methods for two general structural covariance modeling systems.” Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
8.
GRAFF, J.
and P. SCHMIDT (1981) “A general model for decomposition of effects,” pp. 131-148 in K. G. Jöreskog and H. Wold (eds.) Systems Under Indirect Observation, Part 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9.
HARRE, R.
(1972) The Philosophies of Science. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
10.
JÖRESKOG, K. G.
(1977) “Structural equation models in the social sciences: specification, estimation, and testing,” pp. 265-287 in P. K. Krishnaiah (ed.) Applications of Statistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11.
RAO, C. R.
(1973) Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications. New York: John Wiley.
12.
SCHOENBERG, R.
(1987) LINCS: A User's Guide. Kent, WA: Aptech Systems.
13.
SOBEL, M. E.
(1982) “Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models,” pp. 290-313 in S. Leinhardt (ed.) Sociological Methodology, 1982. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
SOBEL, M. E.
(1986) “Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure analysis,” pp. 159-186 in N. B. Tuma (ed.) Sociological Methodology, 1986. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
15.
SOBEL, M. E.
, M. HOUT, and O. D. DUNCAN (1986) “Saving the bath water: an invited comment on Krauze and Slomczynski's `Matrix representation of structural and circulation mobility.' ”Soc. Methods & Research14: 271-284.
16.
STONE, C. A.
(1985) “CINDESE: computing indirect effects and their standard errors.”Educ. & Psych. Measurement45: 601-606.
17.
WOLFLE, L. M.
and C. A. ETHINGTON (1985a) “SEINE: standard errors of indirect effects.”Educ. & Psych. Measurement45: 161-166.
18.
WOLFLE, L. M.
and C. A. ETHINGTON (1985b) “GEMINI: program for analysis of structural equations with standard errors of indirect effects.”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers17: 581-584.
