This article argues that the procedure used to calculate standardized coefficients in LISREL 6.1 is inappropriate. An alternative approach is proposed. The two approaches are compared empirically.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BLALOCK, H. M.
(1982) Conceptualization and Measurement in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
FULLER, T. D.
, P. LIGHTFOOT, and P. KAMNUANSILPA (1984) “Rural-urban mobility in Thailand: a decision-making approach.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Minneapolis.
3.
FULLER, T. D.
, P. LIGHTFOOT, and P. KAMNUANSILPA(1983) LISREL V: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources.
4.
FULLER, T. D.
, P. LIGHTFOOT, and P. KAMNUANSILPA(1978) LISREL IV: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources.
5.
JÖRESKOG, K. G.
and D. SÖRBOM (1984) LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
6.
SÖRBOM, D.
(1981) “Structural equation models with structural means,” in K. G. Jöreskog and H. Wold (eds.) Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, and Prediction. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
