ADLER, R. G.
(1984) “Biothechnology as an intellectual property.”Science224: 357-363.
2.
BRYANT, F. B.
and P. M. WORTMAN (1978) “Secondary analysis: the case for data archives.”Amer. Psychologist33: 381-387.
3.
CAMPBELL, D. T.
(1969) “Reforms as experiments.”Amer. Psychologist24: 71-99.
4.
CAMPBELL, D. T.
and J. C. STANLEY (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
5.
CHEN, H.-T.
AND P. H. ROSSI (1980) “The multi-goal, theory-driven approach to evaluation: a model linking basic and applied social science.”Social Forces59: 1-6-122.
6.
COLLINS, H.M.
(1983) “The sociology of scientific knowledge: studies of contemporary science.”Annual Rev. of Sociology9: 265-285.
7.
DENZIN, N.
(1978) The Research Act. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
GLASER, B. G.
and A. L. STRAUSS (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
9.
GLEICK, J.
(1984) “Solving the mathematics riddle of chaos.”New York Times (June 10): 31-32, 40, 44, 49, 66-72.
10.
HARRISON, A. J.
(1984) “Common elements and interconnections.”Science224: 939-942.
11.
KUKLICK, H.
(1983) “The sociology of knowledge: retrospect and prospect.”Annual Rev. of Sociology9: 287-310.
12.
MICHLER, E. G.
(1979) “Meaning in context: is there any other kind?”Harvard Educ. Rev.49: 1-19.
13.
NORMAN, C.
(1984a) “House votes Florida State a supercomputer.”Science224: 1075-1076.
14.
NORMAN, C.
(1984b) “Georgetown seeks $160 million.”Science224: 1076.
15.
RUBINSTEIN, R. A.
, C. D. LAUGHLIN, JR., and J. McMANUS (1984) Science as Cognitive Process: Toward an Empirical Philosophy of Science. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
16.
WEISS, C. H.
and M. J. BUCUVALAS (1980) “Truth tests and utility tests: decision makers' frames of reference for social science research.”Amer. Soc. Rev.45: 302-313.