Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Since unambiguous ranking of income distributions according to their degree of inequality is not always possible, choice of inequality measure must rest on the appropriateness of particular measures for particular substantive problems. This article provides a complete account of one measure of inequality, δ, defined, for x > 0, as the ratio of the geometric mean to the arithmetic mean—a measure that is closely linked to the sense of distributive justice. Its properties are summarized, and formulas reported for the effects of transfers and of location changes. Analytic expressions for δ for three classical probability distributions—the Pareto, Lognormal, and Rectangular families—are provided, and δ's behavior in within-family comparisons discussed. The measure δ's behavior in between-family comparisons is explored using a new procedure for bounding the zones of ambiguity in inequality comparisons. Finally, a newly obtained decomposition formula for δ is reported.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ALLISON, P. D. (1978) “Measures of inequality.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 43: 865-880.

ATKINSON, A. B. (1975) The Economics of Inequality. London: Oxford Univ. Press.

ATKINSON, A. B. (1970) “On the measurement of inequality.” J. of Econ. Theory 2: 244-263.

BARTELS, C.P.A. and P. NIJKAMP (1976) “An empirical welfare approach to regional income distributions.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 10: 117-128.

CHAMPERNOWNE, D. (1974) “A comparison of measures of inequality of income distribution.” Econ. J. 84: 787-816.

COWELL, F. A. (1977) Measuring Inequality: Techniques for the Social Sciences. New York: John Wiley.

CRAMER, J. S. (1971) Empirical Econometrics. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.

DALTON, H. (1920) “The measurement of the inequality of incomes.” Econ. J. 30: 348-361.

FIELDS, G. S. and J.C.H. FEI (1978) “On inequality comparisons.” Econometrica 46: 303-316.

10.

HASTINGS, N.A.J. and J. B. PEACOCK (1974) Statistical Distributions: A Handbook for Students and Practitioners. London: Butterworth.

11.

HOEL, P. G. (1971) Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. New York: John Wiley.

12.

JASSO, G. (forthcoming) “Who gains and who loses under alternative income distributional regimes that have identical magnitudes of the Gini coefficient.” Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association.

13.

JASSO, G. (1980) “A new theory of distributive justice.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 45: 3-32.

14.

JASSO, G. (1978) “On the justice of earnings: a new specification of the justice evaluation function.” Amer. J. of Sociology 83: 1398-1419.

15.

JENCKS, C. et al. (1972) Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. New York: Harper & Row.

16.

JOHNSON, N. L. and S. KOTZ (1970a) Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions—1. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

17.

JOHNSON, N. L. and S. KOTZ (1970b) Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions—2. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

18.

JOHNSON, N. L. and S. KOTZ (1969) Distributions in Statistics: Discrete Distributions. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

19.

KENDALL, M. and A. STUART (1977) The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Volume 1. New York: Macmillan.

20.

ROTHSCHILD, M. and J. E. STIGLITZ (1973) “Some further results on the measurement of inequality.” J. of Econ. Theory 6: 188-204.

21.

SEN, A. (1973) On Economic Inequality. New York: Norton.

22.

YNTEMA, D. B. (1933) “Measures of the inequality in the personal distribution of wealth or income.” J. of the Amer. Statistical Association 28: 423-433.