This article discloses and considers (1) the various advantages which accrue from employing computer simulation methodology to examine social systems; (2) the disadvantages and potential pitfalls encountered in the utilization of computer simulation techniques; and (3) the feasibility of using microcomputers to simulate social systems by discussing some hardware and software as well as selection considerations the researcher should weigh before choosing a microprocessor-based system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelsonR.P. (1968). “Simulation of social behavior,” in LindzeyG.AronsonE. (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology. Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
AbelsonR.P.BernsteinA. (1963) “A computer simulation model of community referendum controversies.” Public Opinion Q. 27, 1: 93–122.
3.
AnsoffH.I.BrandenburgR.G. (1971) “A language for organization design: part I.” Management Science 17, 12: B705–B716.
4.
BekeyG.A. (1971). “Mathematical models of large systems,” in 1971 IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Group Annual Symposium Record. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
5.
BoguslawR.DavisR.H. (1969) “Social process modeling: a comparison of a live and computerized simulation.” Behavioral Science 14, 3: 197–203.
6.
BoniniC.P. (1963) Simulation of Information and Decision Systems in the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
BorkoH. (1965). “Integrating computers into behavioral science research,” in American Federation of Information Processing Societies, Vol. 27, Part 1. Presented at the 1965 Fall Joint Computer Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada.
8.
BrightmanH.J.KaczkaE.E. (1973) “A computer simulation model of an industrial work group.” Decision Science4: 471–486.
9.
BrotmanL.MinkerJ. (1957) “Digital simulation of complex traffic problems in communications systems.” Operations Research 5, 5: 670–679.
10.
ClarksonG.P.E.SimonH.A. (1960) “Simulation of individual and group behavior.” Amer. Economic Rev. 49: 920–932.
11.
CoeR.M. (1964) “Conflict, interference, and aggression: computer simulation of a social process.” Behavioral Science9: 186–197.
12.
CogswellJ.F. (1965) “System analysis and computer simulation in the implementation of media.” Audiovisual Instruction 10, 5: 384–386.
13.
CohenK.J.CyertR.M. (1965). “Simulation of organizational behavior,” in MarchJ.G. (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
14.
ColbyK.M. (1963). “Computer simulation of a neurotic,” in TomkinsS.S.MessickS. (eds.) Computer Simulation of Personality. New York: John Wiley.
15.
ColemanJ.A. (1964). “Mathematical models and computer simulation,” in FarisR.E.L. (ed.) Handbook of Modern Sociology. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
16.
ColemanJ.A. (1961) “Analysis of social structures and simulation of social processes with electronic computers.” Educ. and Psych. Measurement 21, 1: 165–169.
17.
ConwayR.W. (1963) “Some tactical problems in digital simulation.” Management Science 10, 1: 47–61.
18.
CornblitO. (1972). “Political coalitions and political behavior: a simulation model,” in LaponceJ.A.SmokerP. (eds.) Experimentation and Simulation in Political Science. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
19.
CraneD. (1962). “Computer simulation: new laboratory for the social sciences,” in PhilipsonM.H. (ed.) Automation. New York: Vintage Press.
20.
CyertR.M.FeigenbaumE.A.MarchJ.G. (1971). “Models in a behavioral theory of the firm,” in DuttonJ.M.StarbuckW.H. (eds.) Computer Simulation of Human Behavior. New York: John Wiley.
21.
DearR.E. (1961) “Multivariate analyses of variance and covariance for simulation studies involving normal time series.” Field Note FN-5644. Santa Monica, CA: System Development Corp.
22.
DillW.R. (1963). “Using computers to design and to test organizational structures,” in WildersonShapiro (eds.) Marketing and the Computer. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
DuttonJ.M.BriggsW.G. (1971). “Simulation model construction,” in DuttonJ.M.StarbuckW.H. (eds.) Computer Simulation of Human Behavior. New York: John Wiley.
24.
DuttonJ.M.StarbuckW.H. (1971) “Computer simulation models of human behavior: a history of an intellectual technology.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1, 2: 128–171.
25.
FedericoP.-A. (1976) Computer Simulation: A Technique for Studying Psychosocial and Sociotechnical Systems. Navy Personnel Research and Development Center Technical Note 76-3. San Diego, CA.
26.
FedericoP.-A. (1975) “Surmounting impediments to studying psychosocial systems by using computer simulation.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, August.
27.
FishmanG.S. (1967) “Problems in the statistical analysis of simulation experiments: the comparison of means and the length of sample records.” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 10, 2: 94–99.
28.
FishmanG.S.KiviatP. J. (1968) “The statistics of discrete-event simulation.” SCI Simulation 10, 4: 185–195.
FishmanG.S. (1967b) “The analysis of simulation-generated time series.” Management Science 13, 7: 525–557.
31.
FleisherA. (1965). “The uses of simulation,” in BeshersJ.M. (ed.) Computer Methods in the Analysis of Large-Scale Social Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
FrijdaN.H. (1967) “Problems of computer simulation.” Behavioral Science12: 59–67.
33.
GullahornJ.T.GullahornJ.E. (1972). “Social and cultural system simulations,” in GuetzkowH.KotierP.SchultzR.L. (eds.) Simulation in Social and Administrative Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
GullahornJ.T.GullahornJ.E. (1965) “A computer experiment in elementary social behavior.” IEEE Transaction on Systems Science and Cybernetics 1, 1: 45–51.
35.
HaegerstrandT. (1965). “Quantitative techniques for analysis of the spread of information and technology,” in AndersonC.A.BowmanM.J. (eds.) Education and Economic Development. Chicago: AVC.
36.
HannemanG.J.CarrollT.W.RodgersE.M.StanfieldJ.D.LinN. (1969) “Computer simulation of innovation diffusion in a peasant village.” Amer. Behavioral Scientist 12, 6: 86–95.
37.
HareA.P. (1961) “Computer simulation of interaction in small groups.” Behavioral Science6: 261–265.
38.
HartE.W.SungY.H. (1973) Computer and Experimental Simulation of Triad Decision Making. Technical Report 10. West Lafayette, IN: Department of Psychological Science, Purdue University.
39.
HaythornW.W. (1962) “Group composition in an isolation environment.” Presented at the Fourth IBM Medical Symposium.
40.
HeiseD.R. (1979) Understanding Events: Affect and the Construction of Social Action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.
41.
HunterJ.S.NaylorT.H. (1969). “Experimental design,” in NaylorT. H. (ed.) The Design of Computer Simulation Experiments. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.
42.
KabakI.W. (1968) “Stopping rules for queuing simulations.” Operations Research16: 431–437.
43.
KaczkaE.E.KirkR.V. (1971). “Managerial climate, work groups, and organizational performances,” in DuttonJ.M.StarbuckW.H. (eds.) Computer Simulation of Human Behavior. New York: John Wiley.
44.
KoenigH.E. (1965) “Mathematical models of socio-economic systems: an example.” IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 1, 1: 41–45.
45.
KoopmanB.O.BergerH.M. (1967). “Use and misuse of simulations,” in HollingdaleS. (ed.) Digital Simulation in Operations Research. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
46.
KrugerC. (1963) An Overview of Current and Potential Uses of Simulation in Sociological Research. SDC-SP-363, Santa Monica, CA: System Development Corporation.
47.
LevinM.L. (1962) “Simulation of social processes.” Public Opinion Q. 26, 3:483–484.
48.
LoehlinJ.C. (1965) “‘Interpersonal’ experiments with a computer model of personality.” J. of Personality and Social Psychology 2, 4: 580–584.
49.
MalcolmD.G. (1958) “System simulation—a fundamental tool for industrial engineering.” J. of Industrial Engineering 9, 3: 177–187.
50.
MaloneT.W. (1975) “Computer simulation of two-person interactions.” Behavioral Science20: 260–267.
MartinE.W.Jr. (1959) “Simulation in organizational research.” Business Horizons 2, 3: 68–77.
53.
McpheeW.N.FergusonJ.SmithR.B. (1971). “A model for simulating voting systems,” in DuttonJ.M.StarbuckW.H. (eds.) Computer Simulation of Human Behavior. New York: John Wiley.
McWHINNEYW.H. (1964) “Simulating the communication network experiments.” Behavioral Science9: 80–84.
56.
NaylorT. ILBurdickD.S.SasserW.E. (1969) The design of computer simulation experiments,” in NaylorT.H. (ed.) The Design of Computer Simulation Experiments. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.
57.
NaylorT.H.BalintfyJ.L.BurdickD.S.ChuK. (1966) Computer Simulation Techniques. New York: John Wiley.
OzkaptanH.GettingR. (1963) “Computer simulation of man-integrated systems.” Behavioral Science8: 259–266.
60.
PoolI. (1964) Simulating social systems.” Inter. Science and Technology27:62–72.
61.
PoolI.BernsteinA. (1963) “The simulation of human behavior—–a primer and some possible applications.” Amer. Behavioral Scientist 6, 9: 83–85.
62.
PoolI.AbelsonR. (1961) “The simulmatics project.” Public Opinon Q. 25, 2: 167–183.
63.
RadnorM.RubensteinA.H.TansikD. A.. (1970) Implementation in operations research and R & D in government and business organization.” Operations Research, pp. 967–991.
64.
RainioK. (1966). “A study of sociometric group structure: an application of a stochastic theory of social interaction,” in BergerJ.ZelditchM.AndersonB. (eds.) Sociological Theories in Progress. Vol. 1. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
65.
ReitmanW.R. (1963). “Personality as a problem solving coalition,” in TomkinsS.S.MessickS. (eds.) Computer Simulation of Personality. New York: John Wiley.
66.
RivettB.H.P. (1967) “Why simulate?” in HolingdaleS.H. (ed.) Digital Simulation in Operations Research. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
RobyT.B.BudroseC.R. (1965) “Patterns recognition in groups laboratory and simulation studies.” J. of Personality and Social Psychology 2, 5: 648–653.
69.
RoeckeleinJ.E. (1967) “Simulation of Organizations: An Annotated Bibliography. Technical Report 67-14, 664–861. Alexandria, VA: George Washington University, Human Resources Research Office.
70.
RomeS.C.RomeB.K. (1961) “The leviathan technique for large-group analysis.” Behavioral Science 6, 2: 148–152.
71.
SchultzR.L. (1974) “The use of simulation for decision making.” Behavioral Science 19, 5: 344–350.
72.
ScottW.R. (1964). “Theory of organizations,” in FarisR.E.L. (ed.) Handbook of Modern Sociology. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
73.
SiegelA.I.WolfJ.J. (1969) Man-Machine Simulation Models. New York: John Wiley.
74.
SiegelA.I.WolfJ.J.CosentinoJ. (1971) Digital Simulation of the Performance of Intermediate Size Crews. Technical Report 1071-5. Wayne, PA: Applied Psychological Services Science Center.
75.
SiegelA.I.WolfJ.J.LantermanR.S. (1967) Digital Simulation of Crew Performance: Validation of a Digital Simulation Model for Crew Performance. Technical Report PRR-2-68. Wayne, PA: Applied Psychological Services Science Center.
76.
SimonH.A. (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77.
SissonR.L. (1969) “Computer simulation of a school system.” Computers and Automation 18, 3: 2–23.
78.
SprowlsR.C.AsimowM. (1960). “A computer simulated business firm,” in MalcolmD.G.RoweA.J. (eds.) Management Control Systems. New York: John Wiley.
79.
StarbuckW.H.DuttonJ.M. (1971). “The history of simulation models,” in DuttonJ.M.StarbuckW.H. (eds.) Computer Simulation of Human Behavior. New York: John Wiley.
80.
TaftM.I.ReismanA. (1967) “Toward better curricula through computer selected sequencing of subject matter.” Management Science 13, 11: 926–945.
81.
Van hornR.L. (1971) “Validation of simulation results.” Management Science 17, 5: 247–257.
82.
WaldorfF.ColemanJ.S. (1971). “Analysis and simulation of reference group processes,” in DuttonJ.M.StarbuckW.H. (eds.) Computer Simulation of Human Behavior. New York: John Wiley.
83.
WernerR.WernerJ.T. (1969) Bibliography of Simulations: Social Systems and Education. La Jolla, CA: Western Behavioral Sciences Institute.
