This study examines the accuracy of a survey question about the number of times a
subject has been arrested. Specifically, the study answers questions dealing with
extent of response error, random versus systematic response errors, the reasons for
response errors (lapses in memory and motivational factors that lead to under- reporting or overreporting), and the extent to which the survey response is an
adequate substitute for actual data. The results demonstrate that there is a
considerable amount of response error in the measure and that both memory lapses
and motivational factors contribute to it. Some strategies for dealing with the
problem are explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ball, J. (1966) "The reliability and validity of interview data obtained form 59 narcotic drug addicts."Amer. J. of Sociology72: 640-654.
2.
Bielby, W., R. Hauser, and D. Featherman (1977) "Response errors of nonblack males in models of intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic status."Amer. J. of Sociology83: 1242-1288.
3.
Bradburn, N. and S. Sudman (1974) Response Effects in SurveysChicago: Aldine.
4.
Chai, J. (1971) "Correlated measurement errors and the least squares estimator of the regression coefficient."J. of Amer. Stat. Assn. 66: 478-483.
5.
——— ( 1969) "The bias of the ordinary least squares estimator of the regression coefficient for a bivariate population when both variables are subject to correlated measurement errors."Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association:433-453.
6.
——— and G. Frankfurter (1974) "Errors in variables for the simple linear model: the effects of correlated errors of measurement on interval estimation and hypothesis testing."Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association.
7.
Clark, J. and L. Tifft (1966) "Polygraph and interview validation of self-reported deviant behavior."Amer. Soc. Rev.31: 516-523.
8.
Cochran, W.G. (1970) "Some effects of errors of measurement on multiple correlation."J. of the Amer. Stat. Assn.65: 22-34.
9.
——— (1968) "Errors of measurement in statistics."Technometrics10: 637-666.
10.
——— (1963) Sampling TechniquesNew York : John Wiley.
11.
Deutscher, I. (1973) What We Say What We Do: Sentiments and ActsGlenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
12.
Gould, L. (1969) "Who defines delinquency: a comparison of self-reported and officially-reported indices of delinqueny for three racial groups."Social Problems17: 325-336.
13.
Horvitz, D. AND G. Koch (1969) "The effect of response errors on measures of association," pp. 247-282 in N. L. Johnson and H. Smith (eds.) New Developments in Survey Sampling.New York: John Wiley.
14.
Hyman, H. (1954) Interviewing in Social ResearchChicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
15.
Johnston, J. (1972) Econometric MethodsNew York : McGraw-Hill.
16.
Joreskog, K. (1970) "A general method for analysis of covariance structures."Biometrika57: 239-251.
17.
Koch, G. (1969) "The effect of non-sampling errors on measures of association in 2x2 contingency tables."J. of Amer. Stat. Assn. 64: 851-854.
18.
Lawley, D. and A. Maxwell (1971) Factor Analysis as a Statistical MethodLondon: Butterworths.
19.
Lord, F. and M. Novick (1968) Statistical Theories of Mental Test ScoresReading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
Phillips, D. (1971) Knowledge from WhatChicago : Rand McNally.
21.
--- and K. Clancy (1972) "Some effects of social desirability in survey studies."Amer. J. of Sociology77: 921-940.
22.
——— (1970) "Response bias in field studies of mental illness."Amer. Soc. Rev.35: 503-515.
23.
Robinson, J. and P. Shaver (1973) Measures of Social-Psychological AttitudesAnn Arbor: University of Michigan Survey Research Center.
24.
Walsh, W.B. ( 1967) "Validity of self-report."J. of Consulting Psychology14: 18-23.
25.
Wyner, G.A. (1976) "Sources of response error in self-reports of behavior." Ph.D. dissertationUniversity of Pennsylvania.
