This paper develops and illustrates a new statistical model of recidivism which
enables program evaluators to (1) examine short-run program impact on the
postponement of recidivism, through estimates of the average time at which
recidivism occurs; (2) measure long-run program impact on the prevention of
recidivism, through estimates of the ultimate probability ofrecidivism and (3) help
determine when individuals have been successful long enough to be considered
"safe," through estimates of their conditional probability of future recidivism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Harris, C.M. and Moitra, S.D. (1978) "Improved statistical techniques for the measurement of recidivism."J. of Research in Crime and Dehnquency15: 194-213
2.
. Maltz, M.D. and R. McCleary (1977) "The mathematics of behavioral change: recidivism and construct validity."Evaluation Q.1: 421-438
3.
. ——— and S.M. Pollock (1979) "Recidivism and likelihood functions: a reply to Stollmack."Evaluation Q.3: 124-131
4.
. Stollmack, S. (1979) "Comments on 'The mathematics of behavioral change.' "Evaluation Q.3: 118-123
5.
. ——— and C.M. Harris (1974) "Failure rate analysis applied to recidivism data."Operations Research22: 1192-1205
6.
. Witte, A.D. and P. Schmidt (1977) "An analysis of recidivism, using the truncated lognormal distribution."J. of the Royal Statistical Society (Series C) 26: 302-311.