This paper measures the effect of interviewers and interviewers'prior expectations on response to threatening questions. The results indicate that interviewers are responsible for an average of about 7% of total response variance, to which expectations contribute a small amount. In most practical situations, interviewer expectations can be ignored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blair, E., S. Sudman, N.M. Bradburn, and C. Stocking (1977) "How to ask questions about drinking and sex: response effects in measuring consumer behavior." J. of Marketing Research , 14: 316-321.
2.
Bradburn, N.M., S. Sudman, E. Blair, and C. Stocking (1977) "Question threat and response bias." (working paper).
3.
Crowne, D.P. and D. Marlowe (1960) "A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology." J. of Consulting Psychology24: 349-354.
4.
Hanson, R. and E. Marks (1958) "Influence of the interviewer on the accuracy of survey results." J. of the Amer. Statistical Association53: 635-655.
5.
Hays, W. (1963) Statistics for Psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6.
Hyman, H. et al. (1954) Interviewing in Survey Research. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
7.
Rosenthal, R. (1966) Experimenter Effects in Behavior ResearchNew York: Appleton-Century-Crofts: Sect. 2.
8.
Smith, H. and H. Hyman (1950) "The biasing effect of interviewer expectations on survey results." Public Opinion Q.14: 491-506.
9.
Sudman, S. and N.M. Bradburn (1974) Response Effects in Surveys. Chicago: Aldine.
