The Effects of Interview Schedule Variations On Reported Sexual Behavior

Abstract

Discussions of survey research often assert that characteristics of the schedule affect the data obtained, particularly when the topic is "sensitive. " This research varied three aspects of an interview schedule designed to measure sexual behavior: (1) whether behavior was assessed by interviewer questions or a self-administered questionnaire; (2) the location of questions concerning sexual experience (at the middle or at the end of the interview); and (3) the order or sequence of questions concerning current behavior, partner's characteristics, and partner's ideology. Interviews were conducted with four subsamples of young adults: single male university undergraduates (n = 432), single female undergraduates (429), single male nonstudents (220), and single female nonstudents (293). The results indicate that none of the variations had any substantial effect on reported sexual behavior. These findings are consistent with other analyses in suggesting that such methodological variations are not a major source of differential responses in surveys.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abelson, H. , R. Cohen , and D. Schrayer (1972) "Public attitudes toward marihuana," appdx., pp. 856-1019 in Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding. VoL II. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

--- and M. Rappeport (1973) "Drug experience, attitudes and related behavior among adolescents and adults," appdx., pp. 489-867 in Drug Use in America: Problem in Perspective Vol. I. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

DeLamater, J. (1974) "Methodological issues in the study of premarital sexuality." Soc. Methods and Research 3 (August): 30-61.

Ehrmann, W.W. (1959) Premarital Dating Behavior. New York: Henry Holt.

Gagnon, J.H. and W. Simon (1968) "Youth cultures and aspects of the socialization process: college study marginal book." (unpublished)

Gorden, R. (1969) Interviewing: Strategy, Techniques, and Tactics Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press.

Heise, D.R. and G.W. Bohrnstedt (1970) "Validity, invalidity and reliability," pp. 104-129 in E. Borgatta and G. W. Bohrnstedt , Sociological Methodology , 1970. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Johnson, W. and J. DeLamater (1974) "Insensitivity to sensitivity in survey methods: the case of sex research." Presented at annual meetings of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia.

Kahn, R.L. and C.F. Cannell (1957) The Dynamics of Interviewing: Theory, Technique and Cases. New York: John Wiley .

10.

Lo Sciuto, L. , A. Spector , E. Michels , and C. Jenne (1971) "Public attitudes toward and experience with erotic materials: methodological report," pp. 139-256 in Technical Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Vol. VI. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

11.

Reiss, I.L. (1967) The Social Context of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

12.

Richardson, S.A. , B.S. Dohrenwend , and D. Klein (1965) Interviewing: Its Forms and Functions. New York: Basic Books.

13.

Schofield, M. (1965) The Sexual Behavior of Young People. London: Longmans, Green.

14.

Sorensen, R.C. (1972) Adolescent Sexuality in Contemporary America. New York: World Publishing.

15.

Sudman, S. and N. Bradburn (1974) Response Effects in Surveys. Chicago: Aldine.