Seven distinct factor score procedures for constructing linear composites are compared in a multifactor example. The procedures are compared with respect to validity, invalidity, omega reliability, correlatedness, and linear relationships with external variables. Data are from a national sample taken by the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Advantages and disadvantages of the various procedures are indicated
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, M.P. (1974) "Construction of composite measures by the canonical-factor regression method," pp. 51-79 in H. L. Costner (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1973-1974. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
2.
Alwin, D.F. (1973) "The use of factor analysis in the construction of linear composites in social research." Soc. Methods and Research2: 191-214.
3.
Anderson, T.W. and H. Rubin (1956) "Statistical inference in factor analysis." Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 5: 110-150.
4.
Armor, D.J. (1974) "Theta reliability and factor scaling," pp. 17-50 in H. L. Costner (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1973-1974. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Bartlett, M.S. (1937) "The statistical conception of mental factors." British J. of Psychology28: 97-104.
6.
Harman, H.H. (1967) Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.
7.
Harris, C.W. (1967) "On factors and factor scores." Psychometrica32: 363-379.
8.
Hauser, R.M. (1969) "More on strategies for index construction using factor analysis." University of Wisconsin, October 8. (unpublished)
9.
Heise, D.R. (1974) "Some issues in sociological measurement," pp. 1-16 in H. L. Costner (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1973-1974. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
--- and G.W. Bohrnstedt (1970) "The validity, invalidity and reliability of a composite score," pp. 104-129 in E. F. Borgatta and G. W. Bohrnstedt (eds.) Sociological Methodology 1970. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Holzinger, K.J. and H.H. Harman (1941) Factor Analysis-A Synthesis of Factorial Methods . Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press .
12.
Horn, J.L. (1965) "An empirical comparison of methods for estimating factor scores." Educ. and Psych. Measurement25: 313-322.
13.
Kaiser, H.F. (1958) "The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis." Psychometrika23: 187-200.
14.
Lawley, D.N. and A.E. Maxwell (1971) Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. New York: American Elsevier.
15.
Lo Sciuto, L., A. Spector, E. Michels, and C. Jenne (1971) "Public attitudes towards and experience with erotic materials: methodological report," pp. 139-256 in the Technical Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Volume VI. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
16.
Massey, M.E. (1971) "A marketing analysis of sex-oriented materials in Denver, August 1969: a pilot study," pp. 3-98 in the Technical Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Volume IV. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
17.
Rao, C.R. (1955) "Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis." Psychometrica20: 93-112.
Sampson, J.J. (1971) "Commercial traffic in sexually oriented materials in the United States (1969-1970)," pp. 3-208 in the Technical Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Volume III. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
20.
Smith, K.W. (1974) "Forming composite scales and estimating their validity through factor analysis." Social Forces53: 168-180.
21.
Thurstone, L.L. (1935) The Vectors of Mind. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.
