Berk, R. (1974) "Evaluating evaluations." Presented at Evaluation Colloquium Series, Evaluation Research Program, Psychology Department, Northwestern University, August 13.
2.
Boruch, R.F. (1974) "Bibliography: illustrative randomized experiments for planning and evaluating social programs." Evaluation2: 83-87.
3.
———, P.M. Wortman, and T.D. Cook (1974) "Project on secondary analysis: three year plan for research, development, and testing." PSA Research Report. Northwestern University.
4.
Boruch, R.F., P.M. Wortman, and T.S. DeGracie (1974) "Executive summary: project on secondary analysis ." Presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 2, Washington, D.C.
——— and R.F. Boruch (1975) "Making the case for randomized assignment to treatments by considering the alternatives: six ways in which quasi-experimental evaluations in compensatory education tend to underestimate effects." Extension of a paper presented at Conference on Central Issues in Social Program (C. A. Bennett and A. Lumsdaine, coordinators). Seattle : Battelle Human Affairs Research Center.
7.
Cochran, W.G. (1963) Sampling Techniques. New York : Wiley.
8.
CTW Research Department (1972) " Preliminary data from progress testing: memo to producers and advisors." New York: Children's Television Workshop Research Department (January 27).
9.
Daniels, D.N. et aL (1968) "Dann services program." Research Report. National Institute of Mental Health, Grant 02332 (January).
10.
Deniston, O.L. and I.M. Rosenstock (1972) "The validity of designs for evaluating health services." Research Report. University of Michigan (Ann Arbor) School of Public Health (March).
11.
Goldberger, A.S. (1973) "Structural equation models: an overview," in A. S. Goldberger and O. D. Duncan (eds.) Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. New York: Seminar Press .
12.
Goodwin, W.L. and J.R. Sanders (1972) "The use of experimental and quasi-experimental designs in educational evaluation." Research ReportUniversity of Colorado Laboratory of Educational Research.
13.
Hendricks, M. and C. Wortman (1974) "Reactions to random assignment in an ameliorative social program as a function of awareness of what others are receiving and outcome." Northwestern UniversityPsychology Department.
14.
Holding, D. H. [ed.] (1969) Experimental Psychology in Industry. Baltimore: Penguin.
15.
Kupst, M.J. (1973) "Experiments in communication of medical information ." Research Report NIMH HS 00889. Children's Memorial Hospital , Chicago, Illinois. (mimeo)
16.
Lenihan, K.J. (1975) "The LIFE Project: preliminary results, design questions, and policy issues." Prepared for theManpower Administration, Department of Labor. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Social Science Research .
17.
Mather, H.G., N.G. Pearson, K.L. Read, D.B. Shaw, G.R. Steed, M.G. Thorne, S. Jones, C.J. Guerrier, C.D. Eraut, P.M. McHugh, N.R. Chowdhury, and M.H. Jaffarary (1971) "Acute myocardial infarction: home and hospital treatment." British Medical J.3 (August): 334-338.
18.
Meier, P. (1972) "The biggest public health experiment ever: the 1954 field trial of the Salk poliomyelitis vaccine," in J. M. Tanur, F. Mosteller , W. B. Kruskal, R. F. Link, R. S. Pieters , G. Rising (eds.) Statistics: A Guide to the Unknown. San Francisco: Holden-Day .
19.
Riecken, H.W., R.F. Boruch, D.T. Campbell, N. Caplan, T.K. Glennan, J.W. Pratt, A. Rees, and W. Williams (1974) Social Experiments: A Method for Planning and Evaluating Social Programs. New York: Seminar Press.
20.
Sackett, D.L. (1973) "End results analyses in a randomized trial of nurse practitioners." Research Memorandum, Burlington Study Group, McMaster University Medical Center, Hamilton (Ontario).
21.
Sechrest, L. (1970) "Dissipating and snowballing effects in social amelioration: lotteries as true experiments." Florida State University (Tallahassee) Psychology Department (mimeo)
22.
Thistlethwaite, D.L. and D.T. Campbell (1960) "Regression-discontinuity analysis." J. of Educ. Psychology51: 309-317.
23.
Welch, W.W. and H.J. Walberg (1970) "Pretest effects in curriculum evaluation." Amer. Educ. Research J.6: 605-614.