The Relation Between Female Labor Force Participation and Ferti Lity

Abstract

Numerous investigators have reported evidence of an mverse relation between female labor force participation and fertility rates; but the relation has never been systematically derived from a theory, and recognition that it is neither close nor invariant complicates the matter. This paper states a theory from which the relation can be derived, and the theory extends to a testable generalization about variability in the relation. The theory asserts that the relation is contingent on the "career labor force participation" of females; briefly, the greater such participation is in a universe of populations, the more inverse is the relation between female labor force participation and fertility rates. A test based on data for Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (1960) is consistent with the theory.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bancroft, G. (1968) The American Labor Force New York: John Wiley.

Blakf, J. (1969) "Population Policy for Americans: Is the government being misled?" Science 164 (May): 522-529.

——— (1965) "Demographic science and the redirection of population policy," pp. 41-69 in M. C. Sheps and J. C. Ridley (eds.) Public Health and Population Change. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.

Blalock, H.M., Jr. (1969) Theory Construction Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Collver, A. (1968) "Women's work participation and fertility in metropolitan areas." Demography 5: 55-60.

Dahlstrom, E. (1971) "Analysis of the debate on sex roles," pp. 170-205 in E. Dahlstrom (ed.) The Changing Roles of Men and Women. Boston: Beacon.

Dubin, R. (1969) Theory Building New York: Free Press.

Epstein, C.F. (1970) Woman's Place Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

Gibbs, J.P. (1972) Sociological Theory Construction Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden.

10.

Goldstein, S. (1972) "The influence of labour force participation and education on fertility in Thailand." Population Studies 26 (November): 419-436.

11.

Hage, J. (1972) Techniques and Problems of Theory Construction in Sociology New York: John Wiley .

12.

Hawley, A.J. (1950) Human Ecology New York: Ronald Press.

13.

Hawthorn, G. (1970) The Sociology of Fertility London: Macmillan.

14.

Knudsen, D.D. (1969) "The declining status of women: popular myths and the failure of functionalist thought." Social Forces 48 (December): 183-193.

15.

Kupinsky, S. (1971) "Non-familial activity and socio-economic differentials m fertility." Demography 9 (August): 353-367.

16.

Mullins, N.C. (1971) The Art of Theory: Construction and Use New York: Harper & Row.

17.

NYE, I. F. and L. W. HOFFMAN [eds.] (1963) The Employed Mother m America. Chicago: Rand McNally .

18.

Oppenheimer, V.K. (1970) The Female Labor Force m the United States Berkeley: Institute of International Studies .

19.

Reynolds, P.D. (1971) A Primer in Theory Construction Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

20.

Rossi, A.S. (1965) "Women in science: why so few?" Science 148 (May): 1196-1202.

21.

Rodman, H. (1965) "Talcott Parsons' view of the changing American family," in H. Rodman (ed.) Marriage, Family and Society: A Reader. New York: Random House .

22.

Smuts, R.W. (1959) Women and Work in America New York: Columbia Univ. Press.

23.

Stinchcombe, A.L. (1968) Constructing Social Theories New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

24.

Stycos, J.M. and R.H. Weller (1967) "Female working roles and fertility." Demography 4: 210-217.

25.

Suter, L.E. and H.P. Miller (1973) "Income differences between men and career women." Amer. J. of Sociology 78 (January): 962-974.

26.

Thorsell, S. (1971) "Employer attitudes to female employees," pp. 135-169 in E. Dahlstrom (ed.) The Changing Roles of Men and Women. Boston: Beacon Press.

27.

U.S. Bureau of the Census (1964) U.S. Census of Population: 1960. Vol. I, Characteristics of the Population. Part 1, United States Summary Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

28.

——— (1963) U.S. Census of Population: 1960, Selected Area Reports. Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Final Report PC(3)-D Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office .

29.

——— (1962) U.S. Census of Population: 1960. Detailed Characteristics. Final Report Series PC(1)-1D to 53D Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

30.

——— (1955) U.S. Census of Population: 1950. Vol. IV, Special Reports, Part 5, Chapter C, Fertility Washington, D.C. : Government Printing Office.

31.

——— (1953) U.S. Census of Population: 1950. Vol. II, Characteristics of the Population. Part I, United States Summary Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

32.

U.S. Department of Labor (1971) Fact Sheet on the Earnings Gap Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

33.

Waldman, E. (1970) "Women at work: changes in the labor force activity of women." Monthly Labor Rev. (June): 10-18.

34.

Weinberg, G.H. , and J.A. Schumaker (1969) Statistics: An Intuitive Approach Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.

35.

Weller, R.H. (1968) "The employment of wives, role incompatibility, and fertility." Milbank Memorial Fund Q. 46 (October): 507-526.

36.

Willer, D. (1967) Scientific Sociology: Theory and Method Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall .

37.

Winch, R.F. (1971) The Modern Family New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

38.

Women's Bureau (1969) 1969 Handbook on Women Workers Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

39.

Woods, F.J., Sister (1959) The American Family System New York: Harper & Row.

40.

Zetterberg, H.L. (1965) On Theory and Verification in Sociology Totowa, N.J.: Bedminster.