The experimental model has severe limitations that often are ignored by experimenters. The limitations are likely to account for the low level of external validity of experiments. Placing the model in the context of requirements for measurement emphasizes the limitations and suggests alternatives for improvements in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association (1967) Casebook on Ethical Standards for Psychologists. Washington, D.C.
2.
Ax, A.F. (1953) "The physiological differentiation of emotional states." Psychosomatic Medicine15: 433-442.
3.
Bakan, D. (1966) "The test of significance in psychological research ." Psych. Bull.66: 423-437.
4.
Baron, J. (1971) "Is experimental psychology relevant?" Amer. Psychologist26: 713-716.
5.
Campbell, D.T. and J.C. Stanley (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally .
6.
Chapanis, A. (1967) "The relevance of laboratory studies to practical situations." Ergonomics10: 557-577.
7.
Cherns, A. (1969) "Social research and its diffusion." Human Relations12: 209-218.
8.
Costner, H.L. (1971) "Utilizing causal models to discover flaws in experiments ." Sociometry34: 398-410.
9.
Drabek, T. and E. Haas (1967) "Realism in laboratory simulation: myth or method? " Social Forces45: 337-346.
10.
Goodwin, L. (1971) "On making social research relevant to public policy and national problem solving." Amer. Psychologist26: 431-442.
11.
Higbee, K. and G. Wells (1972) "Some research trends in social psychology during the 1960's." Amer. Psychologist27: 963-966.
12.
Holmes, D. and B. Jorgensen (1971) "Do personality and social psychologists study men more than women?" Representative Research in Social Psychology2: 71-76.
13.
Horst, P. (1966) Psychological Measurement and Prediction. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
14.
McGuire, W.J. (1967) "Some impending reorientations in social psychology: some thoughts provoked by Kenneth Ring." J. of Experimental Social Psychology3: 113-123.
15.
Neufeld, R.J. (1970) "Generalization of results beyond the experimental setting: statistical versus logical considerations." Perceptual and Motor Skills31: 443-446.
16.
Oakes, W. (1972) "External validity and the use of real people as subjects." Amer. Psychologist27: 959-962.
17.
Orne, M.T. (1962) "On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications." Amer. Psychologist17: 776-783.
18.
Rosenthal, R. (1966) Experimenter Effects in Behavioral ResearchNew York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
19.
--- and R. L. Rosnow [eds.] (1969) Artifact in Behavioral ResearchNew York: Academic Press.
20.
Sanford, N. (1970) "Whatever happened to action research?" J. of Social Issues26: 3-23.
21.
Schultz, D.P. (1969) "The human subject in psychological research." Psych. Bull.72: 214-228.
22.
Silverman, I. (1971) "Crisis in social psychology: the relevance of relevance." Amer. Psychologist26: 583-584.
23.
Skellie, A., M. Lipsey, and J. Gordon (1971) "Research and relevance: psychology's potential for concern." APA Proceedings6: 405-406.
24.
Smart, R. (1966) "Subject selection bias in psychological research ." Canadian Psychologist7: 115-121.
25.
Walster, G.W. and T.A. Cleary (1970) "A proposal for a new editorial policy in the social sciences." Amer. Statistician24: 16-19.
26.
Weick, K. (1967) "Promise and limitations of laboratory experiments in the development of attitude change theory," pp. 51-75 in M. Sherif and C. W. Sherif (eds.) Attitude, Ego-Involvement and Change. New York : John Wiley.
27.
Wuebben, P.L., B.C. Straits, and G.I. Schulman (1974) The Experiment as a Social OccasionBerkeley: Glendessary.
