This is a response to the immediately preceding article by George Farkas.
Readers are directed to the Editor's Note on page 333 above.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barton, A.H. (1970) "Allen Barton comments on Hauser's 'context and consex.' "Amer. J. of Sociology76 (November): 514-517.
2.
Blalock, H.M., Jr. (1968) "The measurement problem: a gap between the languages of theory and research," pp. 5-27 in H. M. Blalock, Jr., and A. B. Blalock (eds.) Methodology in Social Research.New York : McGraw-Hill.
Cohen, I. (1969) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral SciencesNew York: Academic Press.
5.
Duncan, O.D. (1970) "Partials, partitions, and paths," pp. 38-47 in E. F. Borgatta and G. W. Bohrnstedt (eds.) Sociological Methodology, 1970. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Farkas, G. (1974) "Specification residuals, and contextual effects."Soc. Methods and Research (this issue).
--- ( 1970a) "Context and consex: a cautionary tale."Amer. J. of Sociology75 (January): 645-664.
9.
--- ( 1970b) "Hauser replies."Amer. J. of Sociology76 (November): 517-520.
10.
--- ( 1969) "Schools and the stratification process."Amer. J. of Sociology74 (May): 587-611.
11.
Kendall, M.G. (1951) The Advanced Theory of StatisticsNew York: Hafner.
12.
Rigsby, L.C. and E.L. McDill (1972) "Adolescent peer influence processes: conceptualization and measurement."Social Sci. Research1 (September): 305-321.
13.
Robinson, W.S. (1950) "Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals."Amer. Soc. Rev.15 (June): 351-357.
14.
Walster, G.W. and T.A. Cleary (1970) "Statistical significance as a decision rule," pp. 246-254 in E. G. Borgatta and G. W. Bohrnstedt (eds.) Sociological Methodology , 1970. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.