The interpretation of experimental manipulations and the precise relation. ship of that interpretation to the observed effects are two major problems facing experimental procedures designed to test social theory. The results of the present study indicate that careful measurement of intervening attitudinal constructs is useful in dealing with these problems. Not only is the predictive power of the experimental model increased, but theoretical assumptions which usually remain untested in experimental research are clarified and explicitly tested. In particular, attention to dimensionality, validity, and reliability of intervening attitudinal constructs avoided serious misinterpretation of the intervening process in the experimental situation and the associated inference to the applicability of the theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aronson, E. and J.M. Carlsmith (1968) "Experimentation in social psychology," pp. 1-79 in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Berger, J. and T.L. Conner (1969) "Performance and expectation and behavior in small groups." Acta Sociologica12: 186-198.
3.
Berger, J. and M.H. Fisek (1970) "Consistent and inconsistent status characteristics and the determination of power and prestige orders." Sociometry33: 287-304.
4.
Berger, J., B.P. Cohen, and M. Zelditch, Jr. (1966) "Status characteristics and expectation states," pp. 29-46 in J. Berger et al. (eds.) Sociological Theories in Progress. Boston : Houghton Mifflin.
5.
Berger, J., T.L. Conner and W.L. McKwoen (1969) "Evaluations and the formation and maintenance of performance expectations." Human Relations22: 481-502.
6.
Blalock, H.M., Jr. (1970) An Introduction to Social Research. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
7.
--- ( 1964) Causal Inferences in Non-Experimental Research. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
8.
Bohrnstedt, G.W. (1970) "Reliability and validity assessment in attitude measurement," pp. 80-99 in G. F. Summers (ed.) Attitude measurement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
9.
——— (1969) "A quick method for determining the reliability and validity of multiple-item scales." Amer. Soc. Rev.34: 542-548.
10.
Burnstein, E. and R.J. Wolosin (1968) "The development of status distinctions under conditions of inequity." J. of Experimental Social Psychology4: 415-430.
11.
Campbell, D.T. and D.W. Fiske (1959) "Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix." Psych. Bull.56: 81-105.
12.
Caudill, W. (1958) The Psychiatric Hospital as a Small Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
13.
Cohen, B.P., J.E. Kiker, and R.J. Kruse (1969) "The formation and performance expectations based on race and education: a replication." Stanford University Laboratory for Social Research T. R. 30.
14.
Costner, H.L. (1971) "Utilizing causal models to discover flaws in experiments ." Sociometry36: 398-410.
15.
Hurwitz, J.I., A.F. Zander, and B. Hymovitch (1953) "Some effects of power on the relations among group members," in D. Cartwright and A. F. Zander (eds.) Group Dynamics: Research and Theory. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson.
16.
Inkeles, A. and P. Rossi (1956) "National comparison of occupational prestige." Amer. J. of Sociology61 (November): 329-339.
17.
Katz, I. and L. Benjamin (1960) "Effects of which authoritarianism in biracial work groups." J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology61: 448-456.
18.
Katz, I. and M. Cohen (1962) "The effects of training negroes upon cooperative problem solving in biracial teams." J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology64: 319-325.
19.
Katz, I., J. Goldston, and L. Benjamin (1958) "Behavior and productivity in biracial work groups ." Human Relations11: 123-141. Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1972) "Problems in methodology," pp. 17-24 in P. F. Lazarsfeld et al. (eds.) Continuity in the Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.
20.
Mead, G.H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.
21.
Moore, J.C., Jr. (1969) "Social status and social influence: process considerations ." Sociometry32: 145-158.
22.
——— (1968) "Status and influence in small group interactions ." Sociometry31: 47-63.
23.
Parsons, T. (1953) "A revised analytical approach to the theory of social stratification," pp. 92-128 in R. Bendix and S. Lipset (eds.) Class Status and Power. New York: Free Press .
24.
--- ( 1951) Ths Social System. New York: Free Press.
25.
Reiss, A.J., Jr. (1961) Occupation and Social Status. New York: Free Press.
26.
Rosenberg, M. (1968) Logic of Survey Analysis. New York: Basic Books.
27.
Scott, W.A. (1968) "Attitude measurement," pp. 204-273 in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
28.
Strodtbeck, F.L. and R.C. Mann ( 1956) "Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations ." Sociometry19: 3-11.
29.
Strodtbeck, F.L., R.M. James, and C. Hawkins (1957) "Social status in jury deliberations." Amer. Soc. Rev.22: 713-719.
30.
Thomas, W.E. and F. Znaniecki (1918-1920) The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
31.
Tiryakian, E. (1958) "The prestige evaluation of occupations in an underdeveloped country-the Philippines." Amer. J. of Sociology63 (January): 390-399.
32.
Torrance, E.P. (1954) "Some consequences of power differences on decision making in permanent and temporary three-man groups." State College of Washington ResearchStudies22: 130-140.
33.
Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (T. Parsons, trans.). New York: Oxford Press.
34.
Zander, A.F. and A.R. Cohen (1955) "Attributed social power and group acceptance: a classroom experimental demonstration." J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology51: 490-492.
35.
Zeller, R.A. (1972) "The effects of educational attainment and performances on the allocation of task responsibility." Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin.
