A growing body of social science research investigates whether the economic payoff to a college education is heterogeneous — in particular, whether disadvantaged youth can benefit more from attending and completing college relative to their more advantaged peers. Scholars, however, have employed different analytical strategies and reported mixed findings. To shed light on this literature, I propose a causal mediation approach to conceptualizing, evaluating, and unpacking the causal effects of college on earnings. By decomposing the total effect of attending a four-year college into several direct and indirect components, this approach not only clarifies the mechanisms through which college attendance boosts earnings, but illuminates the ways in which the postsecondary system may be both an equalizer and a stratifier. The total effect of college attendance, its direct and indirect components, and their heterogeneity across different subpopulations are all identified under the assumption of sequential ignorability. I introduce a debiased machine learning (DML) method for estimating all quantities of interest, along with a set of bias formulas for sensitivity analysis. I illustrate the proposed framework and methodology using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1997 cohort.
AttewellPaulLavinDavidDominaThurstonLeveyTania. 2007. Passing the Torch: Does Higher Education for the Disadvantaged Pay Off across the Generations? Russell Sage Foundation.
2.
BowenWilliam GChingosMatthew MMcPhersonMichael S. 2009. Crossing the Finish Line: Completing College at America’s Public Universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BrandJennie EXieYu. 2010. “Who Benefits Most from College? Evidence for Negative Selection in Heterogeneous Economic Returns to Higher Education.” American Sociological Review75:273–302.
CardDavid. 1993. “Using Geographic Variation in College Proximity to Estimate the Return to Schooling”.
6.
CarneiroPedroHeckmanJames JVytlacilEdward J. 2011. “Estimating Marginal Returns to Education.” American Economic Review101:2754–81.
7.
ChengSiweiBrandJennieZhouXiangXieYuHoutMichael. 2021. “Heterogeneous Returns to College over the Life Course.” Science Advances7: eabg7641.
8.
ChernozhukovVictorChetverikovDenisDemirerMertDufloEstherHansenChristianNeweyWhitneyRobinsJames. 2018. “Double/debiased Machine Learning for Treatment and Structural Parameters.” The Econometrics Journal21:C1–68.
9.
ChettyRajFriedmanJohn NSaezEmmanuelTurnerNicholasYaganDanny. 2020. “Income Segregation and Intergenerational Mobility Across Colleges in the United States.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics135:1567–633.
10.
Ciocca EllerChristinaDiPreteA Thomas. 2018. “The Paradox of Persistence: Explaining the Black-White Gap in Bachelor’s Degree Completion.” American Sociological Review83:1171–214.
11.
DwyerRachel EMcCloudLauraHodsonRandy. 2012. “Debt and Graduation from American Universities.” Social Forces90:1133–55.
12.
FielJeremy E. 2020. “Great Equalizer or Great Selector? Reconsidering Education as a Moderator of Intergenerational Transmissions.” Sociology of Education93:353–71.
13.
GianiMatt SAttewellPaulWallingDavid. 2020. “The Value of an Incomplete Degree: Heterogeneity in the Labor Market Benefits of College Non-completion.” The Journal of Higher Education91:514–39.
14.
HansonSandra LZogbyJohn. 2010. “The Polls-Trends: Attitudes about the American Dream.” Public Opinion Quarterly74:570–84.
15.
HeckmanJames JHumphriesJohn EricVeramendiGregory. 2018. “Returns to Education: The Causal Effects of Education on Earnings, Health, and Smoking.” Journal of Political Economy126:S197–S246.
16.
HoutMichael. 2012. “Social and Economic Returns to College Education in the United States.” Annual Review of Sociology38:379–400.
17.
ImaiKosukeKeeleLukeYamamotoTeppeiet al. 2010. “Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects.” Statistical Science25:51–71.
18.
JoffeMarshall MGreeneTom. 2009. “Related Causal Frameworks for Surrogate Outcomes.” Biometrics65:530–8.
19.
KarlsonKristian Bernt. 2019. “College as Equalizer? Testing the Selectivity Hypothesis.” Social Science Research80:216–29.
20.
KennedyEdward H. 2016. “Semiparametric Theory and Empirical Processes in Causal Inference.” In Statistical Causal Inferences and Their Applications in Public Health Research, pp. 141–167. Springer.
21.
MaJenniferBaumSandy. 2016. “Trends in Community Colleges: Enrollment, Prices, Student Debt, and Completion.” College Board Research Brief4:1–23.
22.
MannHorace. 1957. “Twelfth Annual Report.” In The Republic and the School: Horace Mann on the Education of Free Men, ed. Lawrence A. Cremin, pp. 79–112. New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
MareRobert D. 1980. “Social Background and School Continuation Decisions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association75:295–305.
24.
MaurinEricMcNallySandra. 2008. “Vive la Révolution! Long-Term Educational Returns of 1968 to the Angry Students.” Journal of Labor Economics26:1–33.
25.
MinicozziAlexandra. 2005. “The Short Term Effect of Educational Debt on Job Decisions.” Economics of Education Review24:417–30.
26.
PearlJudea. 2001. “Direct and Indirect Effects.” In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 411–420. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
27.
PolleyE. C.van der LaanM SuperLearner. 2017. “Super Learner Prediction: R package, version 2.0-21”.
28.
RobinsJames M. 1986. “A New Approach to Causal Inference in Mortality Studies with a Sustained Exposure Period-Application to Control of the Healthy Worker Survivor Effect.” Mathematical Modelling7:1393–512.
29.
RobinsJames M. 1997. “Causal Inference from Complex Longitudinal Data.” In Latent Variable Modeling and Applications to Causality, pp. 69–117. Springer.
30.
RobinsJames M. 2003. “Semantics of Causal DAG Models and the Identification of Direct and Indirect effects.” Highly Structured Stochastic Systems pp. 70–81.
31.
RubinDonald B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology66:688–701.
32.
RubinDonald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
33.
SemenovaViraChernozhukovVictor. 2021. “Debiased Machine Learning of Conditional Average Treatment Effects and other Causal Functions.” The Econometrics Journal24:264–89.
34.
TorcheFlorencia. 2011. “Is a College Degree Still the Great Equalizer? Intergenerational Mobility Across Levels of Schooling in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology117:763–807.
35.
van der LaanMark JPolleyEric CHubbardAlan E. 2007. “Super Learner.” Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology6: Article 25.
36.
VanderWeeleTyler J. 2009. “Marginal Structural Models for the Estimation of Direct and Indirect Effects.” Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)20:18–26.
37.
VanderWeeleTyler J. 2010. “Bias Formulas for Sensitivity Analysis for Direct and Indirect Effects.” Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)21:540.
38.
VanderWeeleTyler JArahOnyebuchi A. 2011. “Bias Formulas for Sensitivity Analysis of Unmeasured Confounding for General Outcomes, Treatments, and Confounders.” Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)22:42–52.
39.
VanderWeeleTyler JVansteelandtStijn. 2009. “Conceptual Issues Concerning Mediation, Interventions and Composition.” Statistics and its Interface2:457–68.
40.
VansteelandtStijn. 2009. “Estimating Direct Effects in Cohort and Case–control Studies.” Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)20:851–60.
41.
WillisRobert J.RosenSherwin. 1979. “Education and Self-selection.” Journal of Political Economy87:S7–36.
42.
WodtkeGeoffrey TZhouXiang. 2020. “Effect Decomposition in the Presence of Treatment-induced Confounding: A Regression-with-residuals Approach.” Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)31:369–75.
YoungCristobal. 2009. “Model Uncertainty in Sociological Research: An Application to Religion and Economic Growth.” American Sociological Review74:380–97.
45.
ZhengChengZhouXiao-Hua. 2015. “Causal Mediation Analysis in the Multilevel Intervention and Multicomponent Mediator Case.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B: Statistical Methodology77: 581–615.
46.
ZhouXiang. 2019. “Equalization or Selection? Reassessing the “Meritocratic Power” of a College Degree in Intergenerational Income Mobility.” American Sociological Review84:459–85.
47.
ZhouXiang. 2020. “Some Doubly and Multiply Robust Estimators of Controlled Direct Effects”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.09569.
48.
ZhouXiangWodtkeGeoffrey T. 2019. “A Regression-with-residuals Method for Estimating Controlled Direct Effects.” Political Analysis27:360–9.
49.
ZhouXiangWodtkeGeoffrey T. 2020. “Residual Balancing: A Method of Constructing Weights for Marginal Structural Models.” Political Analysis28:487–506.
50.
ZhouXiangXieYu. 2016. “Propensity Score–based Methods Versus MTE-based Methods in Causal Inference: Identification, Estimation, and Application.” Sociological Methods & Research45:3–40.
51.
ZhouXiangXieYu. 2020. “Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of Self-selection: a Propensity Score Perspective.” Sociological Methodology50:350–85.
52.
ZimmermanSeth D. 2014. “The Returns to College Admission for Academically Marginal Students.” Journal of Labor Economics32:711–54.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
