Individual religiosity measures are used by researchers to describe and compare individuals and societies. However, the cross-cultural comparability of the measures has often been questioned but rarely empirically tested. In the current study, we examined the cross-national measurement invariance properties of generalized individual religiosity in the sixth wave of the World Values Survey. For the analysis, we used multiple group confirmatory factor analysis and alignment. Our results demonstrated that a theoretically driven measurement model was not invariant across all countries. We suggested four unidimensional measurement models and four overlapping groups of countries in which these measurement models demonstrated approximate invariance. The indicators that covered praying practices, importance of religion, and confidence in its institutions were more cross-nationally invariant than other indicators.
Abu-RaiyaHisham. 2013 “The Psychology of Islam: Current Empirically Based Knowledge, Potential Challenges, and Directions for Future Research.” Pp. 681–95 in APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, Theory, and Research, edited by PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W.. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
Abu-RaiyaHishamPargamentKenneth I.. 2011. “Empirically Based Psychology of Islam: Summary and Critique of the Literature.” Mental Health, Religion & Culture14(2):93‐115.
3.
Abu-RaiyaHishamHillPeter C.. 2014. “Appraising the State of Measurement of Islamic Religiousness.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality6(1):22‐32.
4.
ArikanGizemBloomPazit Ben-Nun. 2019. “Religion and Political Protest: A Cross-Country Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies52(2):246‐76.
BechertInsa. 2018. “Comparing Religiosity Cross-Nationally.” Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik2(1):135‐57.
7.
BeckRichardHaugenAndrea D.. 2013 “The Christian Religion: A Theological and Psychological Review.” Pp. 697‐711 in APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, Theory, and Research, edited by PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W.. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
BillietJaak. 2002. Chapter 9. Proposal for Questions on Religious Identity. European Social Survey Core Questionnaire Development. Retrieved December 10, 2020 (https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/core_ess_questionnaire/ESS_core_questionnaire_religious_identity.pdf).
9.
BrownTimothy A. 2015. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press.
10.
BrowneMichael W.CudeckRobert. 1992. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” Sociological Methods & Research21(2):230‐58.
11.
ByrneBarbara M. 2010. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge.
12.
ChenFang Fang. 2008. “What Happens If We Compare Chopsticks With Forks? The Impact of Making Inappropriate Comparisons in Cross-Cultural Research.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95(5):1005‐18.
13.
CornwallMarieAlbrechtStan L.CunninghamPerry H.PitcherBrian L.. 1986. “The Dimensions of Religiosity: A Conceptual Model With an Empirical Test.” Review of Religious Research27(3):226‐44.
14.
CuttingMarschWalshMichelle. 2008. “Religiosity Scales: What Are We Measuring in Whom?” Archive for the Psychology of Religion30(1):137‐54.
15.
DavidovEldadDülmerHermannSchlüterElmarSchmidtPeterMeulemanBart. 2012. “Using a Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Explain Cross-Cultural Measurement Noninvariance.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology43(4):558‐75.
16.
DavidovEldadMeulemanBartCieciuchJanSchmidtPeterBillietJaak. 2014. “Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research.” Annual Review of Sociology40:50‐75.
17.
DeJongGordon F.FaulknerJoseph E.WarlandRex H.. 1976. “Dimensions of Religiosity Reconsidered: Evidence from a Cross-Cultural Study.” Social Forces54(4):866‐89.
18.
DurkheimÉmile. 1995. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Translated by FieldsK. E.. New York: The Free Press. (Original work published 1912).
19.
El-MenouarYasemin. 2014. “The Five Dimensions of Muslim Religiosity. Results of an Empirical Study.” Methods, Data, Analyses8(1):53‐78.
20.
EVS/WVS. 2021. European Values Study and World Values Survey: Joint EVS/WVS 2017-2021 Dataset (Joint EVS/WVS). JD Systems Institute & WVSA.
21.
FaulknerJoseph E.DeJongGordon F.. 1966. “Religiosity in 5-D: An Empirical Analysis.” Social Forces45(2):246‐54.
22.
FichterJoseph H. 1969. “Sociological Measurement of Religiosity.” Review of Religious Research1(3):169‐77.
23.
FischerRonaldKarlJohannes A.. 2019. “A Primer to (Cross-Cultural) Multi-Group Invariance Testing Possibilities in R.” Frontiers in Psychology10:1507.
24.
FinkeRogerBaderChristopher D., eds. 2017. Faithful Measures: New Methods in the Measurement of Religion. New York: NYU Press.
25.
FitzgeraldTimothy. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
FlakeJessica K.McCoachBetsy D.. 2018. “An Investigation of the Alignment Method With Polytomous Indicators Under Conditions of Partial Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal25(1):56‐70.
27.
FloraDavid B.CurranPatrick J.. 2004. “An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Estimation for Confirmatory Factor Analysis With Ordinal Data.” Psychological Methods9(4):466‐91.
28.
GlasSaskiaSpieringsNielsScheepersPeer. 2018. “Re-understanding Religion and Support for Gender Equality in Arab Countries.” Gender & Society32(5):686‐712.
29.
GlockCharles Y. 1962. “On the Study of Religious Commitment.” Religious Education57(4):98‐110.
30.
HassanRiaz. 2007. “On Being Religious: Patterns of Religious Commitment in Muslim Societies.” The Muslim World97:437‐78.
31.
HillPeter C. 2005 “Measurement in the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality: Current Status and Evaluation.” Pp. 43‐61 in Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, edited by PaloutzianF.ParkC. L.. New York: Guilford Press.
32.
HillPeter C.EdwardsEvonne. 2013 “Measurement in the Psychology of Religiousness and Spirituality: Existing Measures and New Frontiers.” Pp. 51‐77 in APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, Theory, and Research, edited by PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W.. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
HillPeter C.HoodRalph W.Jr. 1999. Measures of Religiosity. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press.
34.
HillPeter C.PargamentKenneth I.. 2003. “Advances in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Religion and Spirituality. Implications for Physical and Mental Health Research.” American Psychologist58(1):64‐74.
35.
HiltyDale M.MorganRick L.BurnsJoan E.. 1984. “King and Hunt Revisited: Dimensions of Religious Involvement.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion23(3):252‐66.
36.
HuLi-tzeBentlerPeter M.. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1):1‐55.
37.
HuberStefanHuberOdilo W.. 2012. “The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS).” Religions3(3):710‐24.
38.
InglehartRonald F., et al.2014. World Values Survey: wave Six - Country-Pooled Datafile 2010-2014. Version: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp. JD Systems Institute.
39.
InglehartRonald F.WelzelChristian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
JayakumarTulsiVermaAnshul. 2020. “Indic Religiosity Scale: Developing and Calidating an Indian Religiosity Scale.” Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion18(1):35‐56.
41.
JohnsonEmily C.MeadeAdam W.DuVernetAmy M.. 2009. “The Role of Referent Indicators in Tests of Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal16(4):642‐57.
42.
JohnsonKathryn A.SharpCarissa A.OkunMorris A.ShariffAzim F.CohenAdam B.. 2018. “SBNR Identity: The Role of Impersonal God Representations, Individualistic Spirituality, and Dissimilarity With Religious Groups.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion28(2):121‐40.
43.
JöreskogKarl G.2005. Structural Equation Modeling with Ordinal Variables Using LISREL. Available online at: www.ssicentral.com.
44.
JowellRoger. 1998. “How Comparative Is Comparative Research?” American Behavioral Scientist42(2):168‐77.
45.
KingMorton B.HuntRichard A.. 1972. “Measuring the Religious Variable: Replication.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion11(3):240‐51.
46.
KoenigHarold G. 2015. “Religion, Spirituality, and Health: A Review and Update.” Advances in Mind-Body Medicine29(3):19‐26.
47.
KristellerJeanRapgayLobsang. 2013 “Buddhism: A Blend of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology.” Pp. 635‐52 in APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, Theory, and Research, edited by PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W.. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48.
LemosCarlos MiguelGoreRoss JosephPuga-GonzalezIvanLeRon ShultsF.. 2019. “Dimensionality and Factorial Invariance of Religiosity Among Christians and the Religiously Unaffiliated: A Cross-Cultural Analysis Based on the International Social Survey Programme.” PloS One4(5):e0216352.
49.
LenskiGerhard. 1961. The Religious Factor: A Sociological Study of Religion's Impact on Politics, Economics, and Family Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co.
50.
LoewenthalKate Miriam. 2013 “Religion, Spirituality, and Culture: Clarifying the Direction of Effects.” Pp. 239‐255 in APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, Theory, and Research, edited by PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W.. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
51.
LuYunYangXiaozhao Y.. 2020. “The Two Faces of Diversity: The Relationships Between Religious Polarization, Religious Fractionalization, and Self-Rated Health.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior61(1):79‐95.
52.
LunVivian Miu-ChiBondMichael Harris. 2013. “Examining the Relation of Religion and Spirituality to Subjective Well-Being Across National Cultures.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality5(4):304‐15.
53.
MarshHerbert W.GuoJiesiParkerPhilip D.NagengastBenjaminAsparouhovTihomirMuthénBengtDickeTheresa. 2018. “What to Do When Scalar Invariance Fails: The Extended Alignment Method for Multi-Group Factor Analysis Comparison of Latent Means Across Many Groups.” Psychological Methods23(3):524‐45.
54.
MarshHerbert W.HauKit-TaiWenZhonglin. 2004. “In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal11(3):320‐41.
55.
MeulemanBartBillietJaak. 2011 “Religious Involvement: Its Relation to Values and Social Attitudes.” Pp. 173‐206 in Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications, edited by DavidovE.SchmidtP.BillietJ.. New York: Routledge.
56.
MillsapRoger E. 2011. Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. New York: Routledge.
MuthénBengtAsparouhovTihomir. 2002. “Latent Variable Analysis With Categorical Outcomes: Multiple-Group and Growth Modeling in Mplus.” Mplus Web Notes: №4. Retrieved December 10, 2020 (https://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/CatMGLong.pdf).
59.
MuthénBengtAsparouhovTihomir. 2013. “BSEM Measurement Invariance Analysis.” Mplus Web Notes: №17. Retrieved December 10, 2020 (https://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote17.pdf).
60.
MuthénBengtAsparouhovTihomir. 2014. “IRT Studies of Many Groups: The Alignment Method.” Frontiers in Psychology5:978.
61.
MuthénBengtAsparouhovTihomir. 2018. “Recent Methods for the Study of Measurement Invariance With Many Groups: Alignment and Random Effects.” Sociological Methods & Research47(4):637‐64.
NorrisPippa. 2009 “The Globalization of Comparative Public Opinion Research.” Pp. 522‐39 in The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by RobinsonN.LandmanT.. London: Sage Publications.
64.
NorrisPippaInglehartRonald F.. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65.
PargamentKenneth I.MahoneyAnnetteExlineJulie J.JonesJames W.ShafranskeEdward P.. 2013 “Envisioning an Integrative Paradigm for the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.” Pp. 3‐19 in APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, Theory, and Research, edited by PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W.. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
66.
RohrbaughJohnLessorRichard. 1975. “Religiosity in Youth: A Personal Control Against Deviant Behavior.” Journal of Personality43:136‐55.
67.
RosseelYves. 2012. “Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling and More. Version 0.5–12 (BETA).” Journal of Statistical Software48(2):1‐36.
68.
RutkowskiLeslieSvetinaDubravka. 2017. “Measurement Invariance in International Surveys: Categorical Indicators and Fit Measure Performance.” Applied Measurement in Education3(1):39‐51.
69.
SaroglouVassilis. 2011. “Believing, Bonding, Behaving, and Belonging: The Big Four Religious Dimensions and Cultural Variation.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology42(8):1320‐134.
70.
SaroglouVassilisClobertMagaliCohenAdam B.JohnsonKathryn A.LaddKevin L.Van PachterbekeMatthieuAdamovovaLuciaBlogowskaJoannaBrandtPierre-YvesÇukurCem SafakHwangKwang-KuoMigliettaAnnaMotti-StefanidiFrossoMuñoz-GarcíaAntonioMurkenSebastianRoussiauNicolasValladaresJavier Tapia. 2020. “Believing, Bonding, Behaving, and Belonging: The Cognitive, Emotional, Moral, and Social Dimensions of Religiousness Across Cultures.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology51(7–8):551‐75.
71.
SaroglouVassilisCohenAdam B.. 2013 “Cultural and Cross-Cultural Psychology of Religion.” Pp. 330‐54 in Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, edited by PaloutzianF.ParkC. L.. New York: Guilford Press.
72.
SchwartzShalom H.HuismansSipke. 1995. “Value Priorities and Religiosity in Four Western Religions.” Social Psychology Quarterly58(2):88‐107.
73.
SiegersPascal. 2011 “A Multiple Group Latent Class Analysis of Religious Orientations in Europe.” Pp. 387‐413 in Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications, edited by DavidovE.SchmidtP.BillietJ.. New York: Routledge.
74.
SmithTom W. 2017 “Using the Total Survey Error Paradigm to Improve Cross-National Research on Religion.” Pp. 167‐201 in Faithful Measures: New Methods in the Measurement of Religion, edited by FinkeR.BaderC. D.. New York: NYU Press.
75.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M.BaumgartnerHans. 1998. “Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research.” Journal of Consumer Research25(1):78‐90.
76.
TarakeshwarNalini. 2013 “What Does It Mean To Be A Hindu? A Review of Common Hindu Beliefs and Practices and Their Implications for Health.” Pp. 653‐64 in APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, Theory, and Research, edited by PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W.. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
77.
TarakeshwarNaliniStantonJeffreyPargamentKenneth I.. 2003. “Religion: An Overlooked Dimension in Cross-Cultural Psychology.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology34(4):377‐94.
78.
TarakeshwarNaliniPargamentKenneth I.MahoneyAnnette. 2003. “Measures of Hindu Pathways: Development and Preliminary Evidence of Reliability and Validity.” Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology9(4):316‐32.
79.
TauschArno. 2019. “Multivariate Analyses of the Global Acceptability Rates of Male Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Against Women Based on World Values Survey Data.” The International Journal of Health Planning and Management32(4):1155‐94.
80.
Van de VijverFons J. R. 1998 “Towards a Theory of Bias and Equivalence.” Pp. 41‐65 in Cross-Cultural Survey Equivalence, edited by HarknessJ. A.. Mannheim: ZUMA.
81.
VandenbergRobert J.LanceCharles E.. 2000. “A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research.” Organizational Research Methods3(1):4‐70.
82.
VoasDavid. 2007 “Surveys of Behaviour, Beliefs and Affiliation: Micro-Quantitative.” Pp. 144‐66 in The SAGE Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, edited by BeckfordJ. A.DemerathN. J.. London: Sage Publications.
83.
WeberMax. 2001. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by ParsonsT.. New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1905).
84.
WelzelChristian. 2013. Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
85.
WuHaoEstabrookRyne. 2016. “Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes.” Psychometrika81(4):1014‐45.
86.
ZercherFlorianSchmidtPeterCieciuchJanDavidovEldad. 2015. “The Comparability of the Universalism Value Over Time and Across Countries in the European Social Survey: Exact vs. Approximate Measurement Invariance.” Frontiers in Psychology6:733.
87.
ZinnbauerBrian J.PargamentKenneth I.ColeBrendaRyeMark S.ButterEric M.BelavichTimothy G.HippKathleen M.ScottAllie B.KadarJill L.. 1997. “Religion and Spirituality: Unfuzzying the Fuzzy.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion36(4):549‐64.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
