Measuring the similarity of stimuli is of great interest to a variety of social scientists. Spatial arrangement by dragging and dropping “more similar” targets closer together on the computer screen is a precise and efficient method to measure stimulus similarity. We present Qualtrics-spatial arrangement method (Q-SpAM), a feature-rich and user-friendly online version of spatial arrangement. Combined with crowdsourcing platforms, Q-SpAM provides fast and affordable access to similarity data even for large stimulus sets. Participants may spatially arrange up to 100 words or images, randomly selected targets, self-selected targets, self-generated targets, and targets self-marked in different colors. These and other Q-SpAM features can be combined. We exemplify how to collect, process, and visualize similarity data with Q-SpAM and provide R and Excel scripts to do so. We then illustrate Q-SpAM’s versatility for social science, concluding that Q-SpAM is a reliable and valid method to measure the similarity of lots of stimuli with little effort.
Abele-BrehmAndreaEllemersNaomiFiskeSusanKochAlexYzerbytVincent. 2019. “Navigating the Social World: Shared Horizontal and Vertical Evaluative Dimensions.” Under Review.
2.
AlvesHans. 2018. “Sharing Rare Attitudes Attracts.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin44:1270–83.
3.
AlvesHansKochAlexUnkelbachChristian. 2016. “My Friends Are All Alike—The Relation between Liking and Perceived Similarity in Person Perception.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology62:103–17.
4.
AlvesHansKochAlexUnkelbachChristian. 2017. “Why Good Is More Alike than Bad: Processing Implications.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences21:69–79.
5.
AlvesHansUnkelbachChristianBurghardtJulianeKochAlexKrügerTobiasBeckerVaughn D.. 2015. “A Density Explanation of Valence Asymmetries in Recognition Memory.” Memory & Cognition43:896–909.
6.
BaldwinMatthewLandauMark J.SwansonTrevor J.. 2018. “Metaphors Can Give Life Meaning.” Self and Identity17:163–93.
7.
BijmoltTammoWedelMichelPietersRik G. M.DeSarboWayne. 1998. “Judgments of Brand Similarity.” International Journal of Research in Marketing15:249–68.
BaumeisterRoy F.BratslavskyEllenFinkenauerCatrinVohsKathleen D.. 2001. “Bad is stronger than good.” Review of General Psychology5:323–70.
10.
BrandtMark J.SibleyChris G.OsborneDanny. 2019. “What Is Central to Political Belief System Networks?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin45:1352–64.
11.
BuhrmesterMichaelKwangTracyGoslingSamuel D.. 2011. “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, yet High-quality, Data?” Perspectives on Psychological Science6:3–5.
12.
BurgerJerry M.MessianNicolePatelShebaniPradoAlicia delAndersonCarmen. 2004. “What a Coincidence! The Effects of Incidental Similarity on Compliance.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30:35–43.
13.
ByrneDonn. 1969. “Attitudes and Attraction.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology4:35–89.
14.
ChangJih-JieDouglas CarrollJ.. 1969. How to Use PROFIT, a Computer Program for Property Fitting by Optimizing Nonlinear or Linear Correlation. Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Telephone Laboratories.
15.
ChengJoey T.TracyJessica L.FoulshamTomKingstoneAlanHenrichJoseph. 2013. “Two Ways to the Top: Evidence that Dominance and Prestige Are Distinct yet Viable Avenues to Social Rank and Influence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology104:103–25.
16.
CoelhoGabriel Lins de HolandaHanelPaul H.JohansenMark K.MaioGregory R.. 2019. “Mapping the Structure of Human Values through Conceptual Representations.” European Journal of Personality33:34–51.
17.
DeBruineLisa M.2002. “Facial Resemblance Enhances Trust.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences269:1307–12.
18.
FischerIlan. 2009. “Friend or Foe: Subjective Expected Relative Similarity as a Determinant of Cooperation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General138:341–50.
19.
GentnerDedreMarkmanArthur B.. 1997. “Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity.” American Psychologist52:45–56.
20.
GodwinHayward J.HoutMichael C.MenneerTamaryn. 2014. “Visual Similarity Is Stronger than Semantic Similarity in Guiding Visual Search for Numbers.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review21:689–95.
21.
GoldstoneRobert L. 1994. “An Efficient Method for Obtaining Similarity Data.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers26:381–86.
22.
GoldstoneRobert L.MedinDouglas L.HalberstadtJamin. 1997. “Similarity in Context.” Memory & Cognition25:237–55.
23.
GoldstoneRobert L.SonJi Y.. 2005. Similarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GräfMichaelUnkelbachChristian. 2016. “Halo Effects in Trait Assessment Depend on Information Valence: Why Being Honest Makes You Industrious, but Lying Does Not Make You Lazy.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin42:290–310.
25.
GräfMichaelUnkelbachChristian. 2018. “Halo Effects from Agency Behaviors and Communion Behaviors Depend on Social Context: Why Technicians Benefit More from Showing Tidiness than Nurses Do.” European Journal of Social Psychology48:701–17.
26.
GriffithsThomas L.SteyversMarkTenenbaumJoshua B.. 2007. “Topics in Semantic Representation.” Psychological Review114:211–44.
27.
HenrichJosephHeineStephen J.NorenzayanAra. 2010. “The Weirdest People in the World?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences33:61–83.
28.
HorstJessica S.HoutMichael C.. 2016. “The Novel Object and Unusual Name (NOUN) Database: A Collection of Novel Images for Use in Experimental Research.” Behavior Research Methods48:1393–409.
29.
HoutMichael C.GoldingerStephen D.. 2015. “Target Templates: The Precision of Mental Representations Affects Attentional Guidance and Decision-making in Visual Search.” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics77:128–49.
30.
HoutMichael C.GoldingerStephen D.. 2016. “SpAM Is Convenient but also Satisfying: Reply to Verheyen et al. (2016).” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General145:383–87.
31.
HoutMichael C.GoldingerStephen D.BradyKyle J.. 2014. “MM-MDS: A Multidimensional Scaling Database with Similarity Ratings for 240 Object Categories from the Massive Memory Picture Database.” PLoS ONE9:e112644.
32.
HoutMichael C.GoldingerStephen D.FergusonRyan W.. 2013. “The Versatility of SpAM: A Fast, Efficient, Spatial Method of Data Collection for Multidimensional Scaling.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General142:256–81.
HruschkaDaniel J.MedinDouglas L.RogoffBarbaraHenrichJoseph. 2018. “Pressing Questions in the Study of Psychological and Behavioral Diversity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115:11366–68.
35.
ImhoffRolandKochAlexFladeFelicitas. 2018. “(Pre)Occupations: A Data-driven Model of Jobs and Its Consequences for Categorization and Evaluation.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology77:76–88.
36.
JamesWilliam. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
JonesMichael N.MewhortDouglas J. K.. 2007. “Representing Word Meaning and Order Information in a Composite Holographic Lexicon.” Psychological Review114:1–37.
38.
KlohnenEva C.LuoShanhong. 2003. “Interpersonal Attraction and Personality: What is Attractive—Self Similarity, Ideal Similarity, Complementarity or Attachment Security?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85:709–22.
39.
KochAlexAlvesHansKrügerTobiasUnkelbachChristian. 2016. “A General Valence Asymmetry in Similarity: Good Is More Alike than Bad.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition42:1171–92.
40.
KochAlexImhoffRoland. 2018. “Rethinking the Nature and Relation of Fundamental Dimensions of Meaning.” Pp. 167–79 in Agency and Communion in Social Psychology, edited by AbeleAndreaWojciszkeBogdan. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
41.
KochAlexKervynNicolasKervynMatthieuImhoffRoland. 2018. “Studying the Cognitive Map of the US States: Ideology and Prosperity Stereotypes Predict Interstate Prejudice.” Social Psychological and Personality Science9:530–38.
42.
KochAlexImhoffRolandDotschRonUnkelbachChristianAlvesHans. 2016. “The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency / socio-economic success, conservative_progressive beliefs, and communion.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology110:675–709.
43.
KriegeskorteNikolausMurMarieke. 2012. “Inverse MDS: Inferring Dissimilarity Structure from Multiple Item Arrangements.” Frontiers in Psychology3:245.
44.
KrumhanslCarol L.1978. “Concerning the Applicability of Geometric Models to Similarity Data: The Interrelationship between Similarity and Spatial Density.” Psychological Review85:445–63.
45.
LammersJorisKochAlexConwayPaulBrandtMark J.. 2017. “The Political Domain Appears Simpler to the Politically Extreme than to Political Moderates.” Social Psychological and Personality Science8:612–22.
46.
LêTâm MinhBrardMargotLêSébastien. 2017. “Holos: A Collaborative Environment for Similarity-based Holistic Approaches.” Behavior Research Methods49:1597–604.
47.
MedinDouglas L.GoldstoneRobert L.GentnerDedre. 1993. “Respects for Similarity.” Psychological Review100:254–78.
48.
MoelichErika I.MullerMagdalenaJoubertElizabethNaesTormodKiddMartin. 2017. “Validation of Projective Mapping as Potential Sensory Screening Tool for Application by the Honeybush Herbal Tea Industry.” Food Research International99:275–86.
49.
MontezPriscillaThompsonGrahamKelloChristopher T.. 2015. “The Role of Semantic Clustering in Optimal Memory Foraging.” Cognitive Science39:1925–39.
50.
O’BrienEdKleinNadav. 2017. “The Tipping Point of Perceived Change: Asymmetric Thresholds in Diagnosing Improvement Versus Decline.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology112:161–85.
51.
PattynSvenRosseelYvesHielAlain Van. 2013. “Finding Our Way in the Social World.” Social Psychology44:329–48.
52.
PeerEyalBrandimarteLauraSamatSonamAcquistiAllessandro. 2017. “Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology70:153–63.
53.
PerrinLucieSymoneauxRonanMaitreIsabelleAsselinChristianJourjonFrédériquePagèsJérome. 2008. “Comparison of Three Sensory Methods for Use with the Napping® Procedure: Case of Ten Wines from Loire Valley.” Food Quality and Preference19:1–11.
54.
PrattoFeliciaJohnOliver P.. 1991. “Automatic Vigilance: The Attention-grabbing Power of Negative Social Information.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology61:380–91.
55.
RipsLance J.1989. “Similarity, Typicality, and Categorization.” Pp. 21–59 in Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, edited by VosniadouStellaOrtonyAndrew. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
56.
RisvikEinarMcEwanJean A.ColwillJanet S.RogersReginaLyonDavid H.. 1994. “Projective Mapping: A Tool for Sensory Analysis and Consumer Research.” Food Quality and Preference5:263–69.
57.
RoedigerHenry L.McDermottKathleen B.. 1995. “Creating False Memories: Remembering Words Not Presented in Lists.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21:803–14.
58.
ShaverPhillipSchwartzJudithKirsonDonaldO’ConnorCary. 1987. “Emotion Knowledge: Further Exploration of a Prototype Approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52:1061–86.
59.
ShepardRoger N.1987. “Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science.” Science237:1317–23.
SnyderAaron I.TormalaZakary L.. 2017. “Valence Asymmetries in Attitude Ambivalence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology112:555–76.
62.
SoferCarmelDotschRonWigboldusDaniel H.TodorovAlexander. 2015. “What Is Typical Is Good: The Influence of Face Typicality on Perceived Trustworthiness.” Psychological Science26:39–47.
63.
SuitorJ. JillKeetonShirleyPillemerKarl. 1995. “When Experience Counts: The Effects of Experiential and Structural Similarity on Patterns of Support and Interpersonal Stress.” Social Forces73:1573–88.
64.
TverskyAmos. 1977. “Features of Similarity.” Psychological Review84:327–52.
65.
UngerLaylaFisherAnna V.NugentRebeccaVenturaSamuel L.MacLellanChristopher J.. 2016. “Developmental Changes in Semantic Knowledge Organization.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology146:202–22.
66.
UnkelbachChristianFiedlerKlausBayerMyriamStegmüllerRalfDannerDaniel. 2008. “Why Positive Information Is Processed Faster: The Density Hypothesis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95:36–49.
67.
VerheyenStevenVoorspoelsWouterVanpaemelWolfStormsGert. 2016. “Caveats for the Spatial Arrangement Method: Comment on Hout, Goldinger, and Ferguson (2013).” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General145:376–82.
68.
YimOdiliaRamdeenKylee T.. 2015. “Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: Comparison of Three Linkage Measures and Application to Psychological Data.” The Quantitative Methods for Psychology11:8–21.
69.
YoungForrest W.TakaneYoshioLewyckyjRostyslaw. 1978. “ALSCAL: A Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling Program with Several Individual-differences Options.” Behavior Research Methods10:451–53.
70.
ZouLinda X.CheryanSapna. 2017. “Two Axes of Subordination: A New Model of Racial Position.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology112:696–717.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
