Zero-truncated Binomial Distribution as a Randomization Device

Abstract

In this article, we consider the use of the zero-truncated binomial distribution as a randomization device while estimating the population proportion of a sensitive characteristic. The resultant new estimator based on the zero-truncated binomial distribution is then compared to its competitors from both the efficiency and the protection point of views. The situations where the proposed new estimator performs better are reported. R codes are also included.

Keywords

estimation of proportion sensitive variable randomized response sampling efficiency protection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chaudhuri

Christofides

T. C.

Rao

C. R.

. 2016. Data Gathering, Analysis and Protection of Privacy through Randomized Response Techniques: Qualitative and Quantitative Human Traits. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.

Fox

James Alan

. 2016. Randomized Response and Related Methods. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. (ISBN: 978-1-4833-8103-9)

Gjestvang

Chris

Singh

. 2006. “A New Randomized Response Model.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 68:523–30.

Guerriero

Sandri

M. F.

. 2007. “A Note on the Comparison of Some Randomized Response Procedures.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 137:2184–90.

Johnson

M. L.

Sedory

S. A.

Singh

. 2019. Alternative Methods to Make Efficient Use of Two Decks of Cards in Randomized Response Sampling.” Sociological Methods and Research 48(1):62–91.

Kim

J.-M.

Warde

W. D.

. 2004. “A Stratified Warner Randomized Response Model.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 120:155–65.

Kuk

A. Y. C.

1990. “Asking Sensitive Questions Indirectly.” Biometrika 77(2):436–38.

Lanke

1975. “On the Choice of the Unrelated Question in Simons Version of Randomized Response.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 70:80–83.

Lanke

1976. On the Degree of Protection in Randomized Interviews.” International Statistical Review 44:197–203.

10.

Leysieffer

F. W.

Warner

S. L.

. 1976. “Respondent Jeopardy and Optimal Designs in Randomized Response Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 71:649–56.

11.

Mangat

N. S.

1994. “An Improved Randomized Response Strategy.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 56:93–95.

12.

Mangat

N. S.

Singh

. 1990. “An Alternative Randomized Response Procedure.” Biometrika 77(2):439–42.

13.

Singh

Grewal

I. S.

. 2013. Geometric Distribution as a Randomization Device Implemented in the Kuk’s Model.” International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences 8:243–48.

14.

Ching-Shu

Sedory

S. A.

Singh

. 2017. “Adjusted Kuk’s Model Using two Non-sensitive Characteristics Unrelated to the Sensitive Characteristic.” Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 46(4):2055–75.

15.

Shu-Ching

Sedory

S. A.

Singh

. 2015. “Kuk’s Model Adjusted for Protection and Efficiency.” Sociological Methods and Research 44(3):534–51.

16.

Warner

S. L.

1965. “Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 60:63–69.

17.

Zapata

2018. On Improving Randomized Response Techniques. Unpublished MS Thesis submitted to the Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University–Kingsville, Kingsville.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.27 MB