Spatial regression models provide the opportunity to analyze spatial data and spatial processes. Yet, several model specifications can be used, all assuming different types of spatial dependence. This study summarizes the most commonly used spatial regression models and offers a comparison of their performance by using Monte Carlo experiments. In contrast to previous simulations, this study evaluates the bias of the impacts rather than the regression coefficients and additionally provides results for situations with a nonspatial omitted variable bias. Results reveal that the most commonly used spatial autoregressive and spatial error specifications yield severe drawbacks. In contrast, spatial Durbin specifications (SDM and SDEM) and the simple spatial lag of X (SLX) provide accurate estimates of direct impacts even in the case of misspecification. Regarding the indirect “spillover” effects, several—quite realistic—situations exist in which the SLX outperforms the more complex SDM and SDEM specifications.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S.. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S.. 2015. Mastering Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
AnselinL.1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Studies in Operational Regional Science. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
4.
AnselinL.2003. “Spatial Externalities, Spatial Multipliers, and Spatial Econometrics.” International Regional Science Review26(2):153–66.
5.
AnselinL.BeraA. K.. 1998. “Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models with an Introduction to Spatial Econometrics.” Pp. 237–89 in Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, edited by UllahA.GilesD. E. A.. New York: Dekker.
6.
AnselinL.BeraA. K.FloraxR.YoonM. J.. 1996. “Simple Diagnostic Tests for Spatial Dependence.” Regional Science and Urban Economics26(1):77–104.
7.
AnselinL.Lozano-GraciaN.. 2008. “Errors in Variables and Spatial Effects in Hedonic House Price Models of Ambient Air Quality.” Empirical Economics34(1):5–34.
8.
BetzT.CookS. J.HollenbachF. M.. 2019. “Spatial Interdependence and Instrumental Variable Models.” Political Science Research and Methods60:1–16.
9.
BivandR.PirasG.. 2015. “Comparing Implementations of Estimation Methods for Spatial Econometrics.” Journal of Statistical Software63(18):1–36.
10.
BurridgeP.ElhorstJ. P.ZigovaK.. 2016. “Group Interaction in Research and the Use of General Nesting Spatial Models.” Pp. 223–58 in Spatial Econometrics: Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables, volume 37 of Advances in Econometrics, edited by BaltagiB. H.LeSageJ. P.PaceR. K.. Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
CorradoL.FingletonB.. 2012. “Where Is the Economics in Spatial Econometrics?” Journal of Regional Science52(2):210–39.
13.
CrowderK.HallM.TolnayS. E.. 2011. “Neighborhood Immigration and Native Out-migration.” American Sociological Review76(1):25–47.
14.
DokshinF. A.2016. “Whose Backyard and What’s at Issue? Spatial and Ideological Dynamics of Local Opposition to Fracking in New York State, 2010 to 2013.” American Sociological Review81(5):921–48.
15.
DowneyL.2006. “Using Geographic Information Systems to Reconceptualize Spatial Relationships and Ecological Context.” American Journal of Sociology112(2):567–612.
16.
DrukkerD. M.EggerP.PruchaI. R.. 2013. “On Two-step Estimation of a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances and Endogenous Regressors.” Econometric Reviews32(5-6):686–733.
17.
DubinR.2009. “Spatial Weights.” Pp. 125–58 in The Sage Handbook of Spatial Analysis, edited by FotheringhamA. S.RogersonP.. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
18.
ElhorstJ. P.2014. Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-sectional Data to Spatial Panels. (SpringerBriefs in Regional Science). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
19.
ElhorstJ. P.Halleck VegaS.. 2017. “The SLX Model: Extensions and the Sensitivity of Spatial Spillovers to W.” Papeles de Economía Española152:34–50.
20.
FloraxR.FolmerH.ReyS. J.. 2003. “Specification Searches in Spatial Econometrics: The Relevance of Hendry’s Methodology.” Regional Science and Urban Economics33(5):557–79.
21.
FranzeseR. J.HaysJ. C.. 2007. “Spatial Econometric Models of Cross-sectional Interdependence in Political Science Panel and Time-series-cross-section Data.” Political Analysis15(2):140–64.
22.
FriedrichsJ.GalsterG.MusterdS.. 2003. “Neighbourhood Effects on Social Opportunities: The European and American Research and Policy Context.” Housing Studies18(6):797–806.
GibbonsS.OvermanH. G.PatacchiniE.. 2015. “Spatial Methods.” Pp. 115–168 in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, volume 5, edited by DurantonG.HendersonJ. V.StrangeW. C.. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
25.
GirardD. A.1989. “A Fast ‘Monte-Carlo Cross-validation’ Procedure for Large Least Squares Problems with Noisy Data.” Numerische Mathematik56(1):1–23.
26.
Halleck VegaS.ElhorstJ. P.. 2015. “The SLX Model.” Journal of Regional Science55(3):339–63.
27.
KelejianH. H.PruchaI. R.. 1998. “A Generalized Spatial Two-stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances.” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics17(1):99–121.
28.
KelejianH. H.PruchaI. R.. 2010. “Specification and Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models with Autoregressive and Heteroskedastic Disturbances.” Journal of Econometrics157(1):53–67.
LeeL.-F.2004. “Asymptotic Distributions of Quasi-maximum Likelihood Estimators for Spatial Autoregressive Models.” Econometrica72(6):1899–1925.
31.
LegewieJ.SchaefferM.. 2016. “Contested Boundaries: Explaining where Ethnoracial Diversity Provokes Neighborhood Conflict.” American Journal of Sociology122(1):125–61.
32.
LeSageJ. P.2014. “What Regional Scientists Need to Know about Spatial Econometrics.” The Review of Regional Studies44(1):13–32.
33.
LeSageJ. P.PaceR. K.. 2009. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Statistics, Textbooks and Monographs. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
34.
LeSageJ. P.PaceR. K.. 2014. “The Biggest Myth in Spatial Econometrics.” Econometrics2(4):217–249.
35.
LeSageJ. P.PaceR. K.. 2018. “Spatial Econometric Monte Carlo Studies: Raising the Bar.” Empirical Economics55(1):17-34.
36.
LichterD. T.ParisiD.TaquinoM. C.. 2015. “Toward a New Macro-segregation? Decomposing Segregation within and between Metropolitan Cities and Suburbs.” American Sociological Review80(4):843–73.
37.
LoganJ. R.2012. “Making a Place for Space: Spatial Thinking in Social Science.” Annual Review of Sociology38:507–24.
38.
ManskiC. F.1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” The Review of Economic Studies60(3):531–42.
39.
MorganS. L.WinshipC.. 2015. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
MurJ.AnguloA.. 2009. “Model Selection Strategies in a Spatial Setting: Some Additional Results.” Regional Science and Urban Economics39(2):200–213.
41.
NeumayerE.PlümperT.. 2016. “W.” Political Science Research and Methods4(01):175–93.
42.
OrdJ. K.1975. “Estimation Methods for Models of Spatial Interaction.” Journal of the American Statistical Association70(349):120–26.
43.
PaceR. K.LeSageJ. P.. 2010. “Omitted Variable Biases of OLS and Spatial Lag Models.” Pp. 17–28 in Progress in Spatial Analysis, edited by PáezA.GalloJ.BuliungR. N.Dall’erbaS.. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
44.
PinkseJ.SladeM. E.. 2010. “The Future of Spatial Econometrics.” Journal of Regional Science50(1):103–17.
45.
ReardonS. F.MatthewsS. A.O’SullivanD.LeeB. A.FirebaughG.FarrellC. R.BischoffK.. 2008. “The Geographic Scale of Metropolitan Racial Segregation.” Demography45(3):489–514.
46.
RüttenauerT.2018. “Neighbours Matter: A Nation-wide Small-area Assessment of Environmental Inequality in Germany.” Social Science Research70:198–211.
47.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.EarlsF.. 1999. “Beyond Social Capital: Spatial Dynamics of Collective Efficacy for Children.” American Sociological Review64(5):633–60.
48.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT.. 2002. “Assessing “Neighborhood Effects”: Social Processes and New Directions in Research.” Annual Review of Sociology28(1):443–78.
49.
StakhovychS.BijmoltT. H.. 2009. “Specification of Spatial Models: A Simulation Study on Weights Matrices.” Papers in Regional Science88(2):389–408.
50.
ToblerW. R.1970. “A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region.” Economic Geography46:234–40.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
