The current study compares estimates of peer influence from an analytic approach that explicitly address network processes with those from traditional approaches that do not. Using longitudinal network data from the PROmoting School–community–university Partnerships to Enhance Resilience peers project, we obtain estimates of social influence on multiple outcomes from both conventional linear modeling approaches and the stochastic actor–based modeling approach of the simulation investigation for empirical network analysis (SIENA) software. Our findings indicate that peer influence estimates from SIENA are not more conservative relative to other methods, that each method is subject to omitted variable bias from stable individual differences, and that imprecision among each method could lead to erroneous conclusions in samples that lack sufficient power. Together, these results underscore the difficulty in obtaining estimates of peer influence from observational data, and they give no indication that results from conventional methods tend to be biased toward overestimating peer influence, relative to SIENA.
AnselinLucBeraAnil K.. 1998. “Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models with an Introduction to Spatial Econometrics.” Pp. 237–90 in Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, edited by UllahA.GilesD. E. A.. New York: Marcel Dekker.
5.
AralSinanMuchnikLevSundararajanArun. 2009. “Distinguishing Influence-based Contagion from Homophily-driven Diffusion in Dynamic Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science106:21544–49.
6.
BanduraAlbert. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
BaumanKarl E.EnnettSusan T.. 1996. “On the Importance of Peer Influence for Adolescent Drug Use: Commonly Neglected Considerations.” Addiction91:185–98.
8.
BotvinGilbert J.GriffinKenneth W.. 2004. “Life Skills Training: Empirical Findings and Future Directions.” Journal of Primary Prevention25:211–32.
9.
BrechwaldWhitney A.PrinsteinMitchell J.. 2011. “Beyond Homophily: A Decade of Advances in Understanding Peer Influence Processes.” Journal of Research on Adolescence21:166–79.
10.
Cohen-ColeEthanFletcherJason M.. 2008. “Detecting Implausible Social Network Effects in Acne, Height, and Headaches: Longitudinal Analysis.” British Medical Journal337:a2533.
11.
CrosnoeRobert. 2004. “Social Capital and the Interplay of Families and Schools.” Journal of Marriage and Family66:267–80.
12.
de la HayeKaylaRobbinsGarryMohrPhilipWilsonCarlene. 2011a. “Homophily and Contagion as Explanations for Weight Similarity among Adolescent Friends.” Journal of Adolescent Health49:421–27.
13.
de la HayeKaylaRobbinsGarryMohrPhilipWilsonCarlene. 2011b. “How Physical Activity Shapes, and Is Shaped by, Adolescent Friendships.” Social Science & Medicine73:719–28.
14.
EllenJonathan M.2009. “Social Networks Research and Challenges to Causal Inference.” Journal of Adolescent Health45:109–10.
15.
FriedkinNoah E.1998. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
FriedkinNoah E.JohnsenEugene C.. 1997. “Social Positions in Influence Networks.” Social Networks19:209–22.
18.
FriedkinNoah E.JohnsenEugene C.. 1999. “Social Influence Networks and Opinion Change.” Advances in Group Processes16:1–29.
19.
FriedkinNoah E.JohnsenEugene C.. 2011. Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
FriedkinNoah E.ProskurnikovAnton V.TempoRobertoParsegovSergey E.. 2016. “Network Science on Belief System Dynamics under Logic Constraints.” Science354:321–26.
21.
FriemelThomas N.2012. “Network Dynamics of Television Use in School Classes.” Social Networks34:346–58.
22.
HirschiTravis. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
JussimLeeWayne OsgoodD.. 1989. “Influence and Similarity among Friends: An Integrative Model Applied to Incarcerated Adolescents.” Social Psychology Quarterly52:98–112.
24.
KandelDenise B.1978. “Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships.” American Journal of Sociology84:427–36.
25.
KandelDenise B.1996. “The Parental and Peer Contexts of Adolescent Deviance: An Algebra of Interpersonal Influences.” Journal of Drug Issues26:289–315.
26.
KnechtAndrea B.BurkWilliam J.WeesieJeroenSteglichChristian. 2011. “Friendship and Alcohol Use in Early Adolescence: A Multilevel Social Network Approach.” Journal of Research on Adolescence21:475–87.
27.
McCorkleLloyd W.KornRichard. 1954. “Resocialization within Walls.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science293:88–98.
28.
McFarlandDaniel A.MoodyJamesDiehlDavidSmithJeffrey A.ThomasReuben J.. 2014. “Network Ecology and Adolescent Social Structure.” American Sociological Review79:1088–121.
29.
MeadGeorge H.1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
MerckenLiesbethSteglichChristianSinclairPhilipHolidayJoMooreLaurence. 2012. “A Longitudinal Social Network Analysis of Peer Influence, Peer Selection, and Smoking Behavior among Adolescents in British Schools.” Health Psychology31:450–59.
31.
MertonRobert K.KittAlice S.. 1950. “Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behavior.” Pp. 40–105 in Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of “The American Soldier,” edited by MertonRobert K.LazarsfeldPaul F.. New York: Free Press.
32.
NewcombTheodore M.1950. Social Psychology. New York: Dryden.
33.
OsgoodD. WayneFeinbergMark E.RaganDaniel T.. 2015. “Social Networks and the Diffusion of Adolescent Problem Behavior: Reliable Estimates of Selection and Influence from Sixth through Ninth Grades.” Prevention Science16:832–43.
34.
OsgoodD. WayneRaganDaniel T.WallaceLaceyGestScott D.FeinbergMark E.MoodyJames. 2013. “Peers and the Emergence of Alcohol Use: Influence and Selection Processes in Adolescent Friendship Networks.” Journal of Research on Adolescence23:500–12.
35.
PintrichPaul R.De GrootElisabeth V.. 1990. “Motivational and Self-regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology82:33–40.
36.
RaganDaniel T.Wayne OsgoodD.FeinbergMark E.. 2014. “Friends as a Bridge to Parental Influence: Implications for Adolescent Alcohol Use.” Social Forces92:1061–85.
37.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.CongdonRichard. 2004. HLM 6 for Windows. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
39.
RawlingsCraig M.FriedkinNoah E.. 2017. “The Structural Balance Theory of Sentiment Networks: Elaboration and Test.” American Journal of Sociology123:510–48.
40.
RiveraMark T.SoderstromSara B.UzziBrian. 2010. “Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational, and Proximity Mechanisms.” Annual Review of Sociology36:91–115.
41.
SchaeferDavid R.HaasSteven A.BishopNicholas J.. 2012. “A Dynamic Model of US Adolescents’ Smoking and Friendship Networks.”American Journal of Public Health102:e12–18.
42.
ShaliziCosma RohillaThomasAndrew C.. 2011. “Homophily and Contagion Are Generally Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies.” Sociological Methods & Research40:211–39.
43.
SnijdersTom A. B.2001. “The Statistical Evaluation of Social Network Dynamics.” Sociological Methodology31:361–95.
44.
SnijdersTom A. B.2005. “Models for Longitudinal Network Data.” Pp. 215–47 in Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, edited byCarringtonP. J.ScottJ.WassermanS.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
SpothRichardRedmondCleveClairScottShinChungyeolGreenbergMarkFeinbergMark. 2011. “Preventing Substance Misuse through Community-University Partnerships: Randomized Controlled Trial Outcomes 4 ½ Years Past Baseline.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine40:440–47.
46.
SteglichChristianSnijdersTom A. B.PearsonMichael. 2010. “Dynamic Networks and Behavior: Separating Selection from Influence.” Sociological Methodology40:329–93.
47.
SutherlandEdwin H.1947. Principles of Criminology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
48.
SweetenGary. 2012. “Scaling Criminal Offending.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology28:533–57.
49.
ValenteThomas W.1995. Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
50.
VanderWeeleTyler J.2011. “Sensitivity Analysis for Contagion Effects in Social Networks.” Sociological Methods & Research40:240–55.
51.
VeenstraRenéDijkstraJan KornelisVan ZalkMaarten H. W.SteglichChristian. 2013. “Network-behavior Dynamics.” Journal of Research on Adolescence23:399–412.
52.
WeermanFrank M.2011. “Delinquent Peers in Context: A Longitudinal Network Analysis of Selection and Influence Effects.” Criminology49:253–86.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
