DavidovEldadCieciuchJanMeulemanBartSchmidtPeterBillietJaak. 2014. “Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research.” Annual Review of Sociology40:55–75. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137.
4.
DavidovEldadDülmerHermannSchlüterElmarSchmidtPeterMeulemanBart. 2012. “Using a Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Explain Cross-Cultural Measurement Noninvariance.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology43(4):558–75. doi: 10.1177/0022022112438397.
5.
DavidovEldadSchmidtPeterBillietJaakMeulemanBart. 2018. Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
6.
GibsonRachel K.HallerMaxHadlerMarkusHoellingerFranzDimovaLiliaPymanHeatherPammettJon H. (2012). International Social Survey Programme: National Identity II - ISSP 2003.
7.
HoijtinkHerbertSchootRens van der. 2018. “Testing Small Variance Priors Using Prior-Posterior Predictive P-Values.” Psychological Methods23:561–569. doi: 10.1037/met0000131.
8.
JakSuzanneOortFrans J.DolanConor V.. 2013. “A Test for Cluster Bias: Detecting Violations of Measurement Invariance across Clusters in Multilevel Data.” Structural Equation Modeling20:265–82. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2013.769392.
9.
JennrichRobert I.2006. “Rotation to Simple Loadings Using Component Loss Functions: The Oblique Case.” Psychometrika71:173–91. doi: 10.1007/s11336-003-1136-B.
MarshHerbert W.GuoJiesiParkerPhilip D.NagengastBenjaminAsparouhovTihomirMuthénBengtDickeTheresa. 2018. “What to Do When Scalar Invariance Fails: The Extended Alignment Method for Multi-Group Factor Analysis Comparison of Latent Means across Many Groups.” Psychological Methods23:524–545. doi: 10.1037/met0000113.
12.
MillsapRoger E.2011. Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. New York: Taylor and FrancisGroup.
13.
MuthénBengtAsparouhovTihomir. 2012. “Bayesian SEM: A More Flexible Representation of Substantive Theory.” Psychological Methods17:313–35. doi: 10.1037/a0026802.
SolokovBoris. 2018. “The Index of Emancipative Values: Measurement Model Misspecifications.” American Political Science Review112(2):395–408. doi: 10.1017/S0003055417000624
16.
van der SchootRensKluytmansAnouckTummersLars G.LugtigPeterHoxJoopMuthénBengt. 2013. “Facing Off with Scylla and Charybdis: A Comparison of Scalar, Partial, and the Novel Possibility of Approximate Measurement Invariance.” Frontiers in Psychology4(770):1–15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00770.
