Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Studies

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asparouhov

Tihomir

Muthén

Bengt

. 2013. “Multiple Group Factor Analysis Alignment.” Structural Equation Modeling 21:495–508. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.919210.

Asparouhov

Tihomir

Muthén

Bengt

. 2017, 4 27. “Prior-Posterior Predictive P-Values.” Mplus Web Notes: No. 22, Version 2. Retrieved May 26, 2017 (http://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote22.pdf).

Davidov

Eldad

Cieciuch

Jan

Meuleman

Bart

Schmidt

Peter

Billiet

Jaak

. 2014. “Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 40:55–75. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137.

Davidov

Eldad

Dülmer

Hermann

Schlüter

Elmar

Schmidt

Peter

Meuleman

Bart

. 2012. “Using a Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Explain Cross-Cultural Measurement Noninvariance.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 43(4):558–75. doi: 10.1177/0022022112438397.

Davidov

Eldad

Schmidt

Peter

Billiet

Jaak

Meuleman

Bart

. 2018. Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

Gibson

Rachel K.

Haller

Max

Hadler

Markus

Hoellinger

Franz

Dimova

Lilia

Pyman

Heather

Pammett

Jon H.

(2012). International Social Survey Programme: National Identity II - ISSP 2003.

Hoijtink

Herbert

Schoot

Rens van der

. 2018. “Testing Small Variance Priors Using Prior-Posterior Predictive P-Values.” Psychological Methods 23:561–569. doi: 10.1037/met0000131.

Jak

Suzanne

Oort

Frans J.

Dolan

Conor V.

. 2013. “A Test for Cluster Bias: Detecting Violations of Measurement Invariance across Clusters in Multilevel Data.” Structural Equation Modeling 20:265–82. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2013.769392.

Jennrich

Robert I.

2006. “Rotation to Simple Loadings Using Component Loss Functions: The Oblique Case.” Psychometrika 71:173–91. doi: 10.1007/s11336-003-1136-B.

10.

Lee

Sik-Yum

. 2007. Structural Equation Modeling: A Bayesian Approach. Chichester, England: Wiley.

11.

Marsh

Herbert W.

Guo

Jiesi

Parker

Philip D.

Nagengast

Benjamin

Asparouhov

Tihomir

Muthén

Bengt

Dicke

Theresa

. 2018. “What to Do When Scalar Invariance Fails: The Extended Alignment Method for Multi-Group Factor Analysis Comparison of Latent Means across Many Groups.” Psychological Methods 23:524–545. doi: 10.1037/met0000113.

12.

Millsap

Roger E.

2011. Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. New York: Taylor and FrancisGroup.

13.

Muthén

Bengt

Asparouhov

Tihomir

. 2012. “Bayesian SEM: A More Flexible Representation of Substantive Theory.” Psychological Methods 17:313–35. doi: 10.1037/a0026802.

14.

Muthén

Bengt

Asparouhov

Tihomir

. 2013, 1 11. “BSEM Measurement Invariance Analysis.” Mplus Web Notes: No. 17, Retrieved May 26, 2017 (http://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote17.pdf).

15.

Solokov

Boris

. 2018. “The Index of Emancipative Values: Measurement Model Misspecifications.” American Political Science Review 112(2):395–408. doi: 10.1017/S0003055417000624

16.

van der Schoot

Rens

Kluytmans

Anouck

Tummers

Lars G.

Lugtig

Peter

Hox

Joop

Muthén

Bengt

. 2013. “Facing Off with Scylla and Charybdis: A Comparison of Scalar, Partial, and the Novel Possibility of Approximate Measurement Invariance.” Frontiers in Psychology 4(770):1–15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00770.