Multifactorial survey experiments such as stated choice experiments are used more and more frequently in social science research. In this article, based on an experimental study on ethical and political consumption, we explore the potential of hybrid choice models to explicitly model latent psychological factors such as attitudes, overcoming a possible endogeneity bias and misrepresentation of causality. To this end, we employ a hybrid latent class choice model (HLCCM) in which the latent class structure allocates individuals to classes according to underlying latent attitudes that also influence the answers to attitudinal questions. This allows, in line with sociological action theories, a theory-guided testing of preference segmentation and modification caused by attitudes. We compare the complex HLCCM with less complex models that do not take the latent variable nature of attitudes into account and discuss in which cases less complex models might be more appropriate. However, the HLCCM always has the advantage of providing structure for theory testing and is therefore a useful tool to uncover preference heterogeneity, preference modification, and decision-making processes in sociological and other social science research.
AjzenI.1988. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
2.
AndorferV. A.LiebeU.. 2012. “Research on Fair Trade Consumption—A Review.” Journal of Business Ethics106:415–35.
3.
AndorferV. A.LiebeU.. 2013. “Consumer Behavior in Moral Markets. On the Relevance of Identity, Justice Beliefs, Social Norms, Status, and Trust in Ethical Consumption.” European Sociological Review29:1251–65.
4.
AuspurgK.HinzT.. 2014. Factorial Survey Experiments. Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 175. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
AuspurgK.HinzT.. 2015. “Multifactorial Experiments in Surveys: Conjoint Analysis, Choice Experiments, and Factorial Surveys.” Pp. 291–315 in Experimente in den Sozialwissenschaften. Soziale Welt Sonderband 22, edited by WolbringT.KeuschniggM.. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
6.
BansakK.HainmuellerJ.HangartnerD.. 2016. “How Economic, Humanitarian, and Religious Concerns Shape European Attitudes toward Asylum Seekers.” Science354:217–22.
7.
BechtelM.ScheveK. F.. 2013. “Mass Support for Global Climate Agreements Depends on Institutional Design.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110:13763–68.
Ben-AkivaM.WalkerJ. L.BernardinoA. T.GopinathD. A.MorikawaT.PolydoropoulouA.. 2002. “Integration of Choice and Latent Variable Models.” Pp. 431–70 in In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges, edited by MahmassaniH. S.. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
BergmannW.ErbR.. 1986. “Kommunikationslatenz, Moral und öffentliche Meinung. Theoretische Überlegungen zum Antisemitismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie[In German]38:223–46.
12.
BergmannW.ErbR.. 1991. “Mir ist das Thema Juden Irgendwie Unangenehm. Kommunikationslatenz und die Wahrnehmung des Meinungsklimas im Fall des Antisemitismus.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie[In German]43:502–519.
13.
BerndtE. K.HallB. H.HallR. E.HausmanJ. A.. 1974. “Estimation and Inference in Nonlinear Structural Models.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement3/4:653–65.
14.
BeyerH.LiebeU.. 2010. “Antiamerikanismus und Antisemitismus: Zum Verhaeltnis zweier Ressentiments.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie39:215–32.
15.
BeyerH.LiebeU.. 2015. “Three Experimental Approaches to Measure the Social Context Dependence of Prejudice Communication and Discriminatory Behavior.” Social Science Research49:343–55.
16.
BierlaireM.2003. “BIOGEME: A Free Package for the Estimation of Discrete Choice Models.” Paper presented at 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, March 19–21, Monte-Verita, Ascona, Switzerland.
17.
BierlaireM.2009. “Estimation of Discrete Choice Models with BIOGEME 1.8.” Accessed June 15, 2018. Retrieved (biogeme.epfl.ch).
18.
BierlaireM.2016. “PythonBiogeme: a short introduction.” Report TRANSP-OR 160706, Series on Biogeme. Transport and Mobility Laboratory, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland. Accessed June 15, 2018. Retrieved (biogeme.epfl.ch).
19.
BohnerG.DickelN.. 2011. “Attitudes and Attitude Change.” Annual Review of Psychology62:391–417.
20.
BoskinM. J.1974. “A Conditional Logit Model of Occupational Choice.” Journal of Political Economy82(2):389–98.
21.
BruchE.FeinbergF.. 2017. “Decision-Making Processes in Social Contexts. Home.” Annual Review of Sociology43:207–27.
22.
BurgessL.StreetD. J.. 2005. “Optimal Designs for Choice Experiments with Asymmetric Attributes.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference134:288–301.
23.
BuskensV. W.WeesieH. M.. 2000. “An Experiment on the Effects of Embeddedness in Trust Situations: Buying a Used Car.” Rationality and Society12:227–53.
24.
CarlsonE.2015. “Ethnic Voting and Accountability in Africa: A Choice Experiment in Uganda.” World Politics67:353–85.
25.
ChorusC. G.2014. “Capturing Alternative Decision Rules in Travel Choice Models: A Critical Discussion.” Pp. 290–310 in Chapter 13: Handbook of Choice Modelling, edited by HessS.DalyA.. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
26.
CohrsJ. C.KielmannS.MoschnerB.MaesJ.. 2002. Befragung zum 11. September 2001 und den Folgen: Grundideen, Operationalisierungen und deskriptive Ergebnisse der ersten Erhebungsphase. Forschungsbericht[In German]. Bielefeld, Germany: Universitaet Bielefeld: Abteilung für Psychologie der Universitaet Bielefeld.
27.
DalyA. J.HessS.PatruniS. B.PotoglouD.RohrC.. 2012. “Using Ordered Attitudinal Indicators in a Latent Variable Choice Model: A Study of the Impact of Security on Rail Travel Behaviour.” Transportation39:267–97.
28.
DeckerO.BrählerE.. 2006. Vom Rand Zur Mitte. Rechtsextreme Einstellung Und Ihre Einflussfaktoren in Deutschland[In German]. Berlin, Germanty: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
29.
DeckerO.WeißmannM.KiessJ.BrählerE.. 2010. Die Mitte in der Krise. Rechtsextreme Einstellungen in Deutschland 2010[In German]. Berlin, Germany: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
30.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS.. 1993. Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
31.
FriedmanM.1996. “A Positive Approach to Organized Consumer Action: The “Buycott” as an Alternative to the Boycott.” Journal of Consumer Policy19:439–51.
32.
GlerumA.AtasoyB.BierlaireM.. 2014. “Using Semi-open Questions to Integrate Perceptions in Choice Models.” Journal of Choice Modelling10:11–33.
33.
HainmuellerJ.HopkinsD. J.. 2015. “The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants.” American Journal of Political Science59:529–48.
34.
HarunH.ShahK. A. M.. 2013. “Xenophobia and Its Effects on Foreign Products Purchase: A Proposed Conceptual Framework.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law3(1):88–94.
35.
HechterM.KanazawaS.. 1997. “Sociological Rational Choice Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology23:191–214.
36.
HerfJ.2013. Anti-semitism and Anti-zionism in Historical Perspective: Convergence and Divergence. London, England: Routledge.
37.
HirshD.2007. “Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism: Cosmopolitan Reflections.”Working Paper No. 1940-610X, Yale Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Antisemitism, New Haven, CT.
38.
HolmesT. P.AdamowiczW. L.CarlssonF.. 2017. “Choice Experiments.” Pp. 133–86, 2nd ed. in Chapter 5: A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, edited by ChampP. A.BoyleK. J.BrownT. C.. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
JohnsonS. D.1992. “Anti-Arabic Prejudice in ‘Middletown.’” Psychological Reports70(3):811–18.
41.
JudakenJ.2008. “So What’s New? Rethinking the ‘New Antisemitism’ in a Global Age.” Patterns of Prejudice42:531–60.
42.
KlugB.2003. “The Collective Jew: Israel and the New Antisemitism.” Patterns of Prejudice37:117–38.
43.
KroesenM.HandyS.ChorusC. G.. 2017. “Do Attitudes Cause Behavior or Vice Versa? An Alternative Conceptualization of the Attitude–Behavior Relationship in Travel Behavior Modeling.” Transportation Research Part A101:190–202.
44.
KronebergC.KalterF.. 2012. “Rational Choice Theory and Empirical Research: Methodological and Theoretical Contributions in Europe.” Annual Review of Sociology38:73–92.
45.
KurthenH.BergmannW.ErbR.. 1997. Antisemitism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
46.
LancasterK. J.1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” The Journal of Political Economy74:132–57.
47.
LeiboldJ.KühnelS.. 2006. “Islamophobie. Differenzierung tut not.” Pp. 135–55 in Deutsche Zustände. Folge 4 [In German], edited by HeitmeyerW.. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
48.
LentzT. F.1938. “Acquiescence as a Factor in the Measurement of Personality.” Psychological Bulletin35:659.
49.
LiebeU.2014. “Willingness to Pay for Private Environmental Goods.” Pp. 7131–137 in Encyclopedia of Quality of Life Research, edited by MichalosA. C.. New York: Springer.
50.
LiebeU.HundeshagenC.BeyerH.Cramon-TaubadelS. V.. 2016. “Context Effects and Temporal Stability of Stated Preferences.” Social Science Research60:135–47.
51.
LongJ. S.1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
LouviereJ. J.HensherD. A.SwaitJ. D.. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
53.
LouviereJ.FlynnT. N.CarsonR. T.. 2010. “Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis.” Journal of Choice Modelling3(3):57–72.
54.
MarielP.MeyerhoffJ.. 2016. “Hybrid Discrete Choice Models: Gained Insights versus Increasing Effort.” Science of the Total Environment568:433–43.
55.
MarielP.MeyerhoffJ.HessS.. 2015. “Heterogeneous Preferences toward Landscape Externalities of Wind Turbines—Combining Choices and Attitudes in a Hybrid Model.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews41:647–57.
56.
McFaddenD.1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” Pp. 105–42 in Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by ZarembkaP.. New York: Academic Press.
57.
McFaddenD.1986. “The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research.” Marketing Science, Special Issue on Consumer Choice Models5(4):275–97.
58.
McFaddenD.2001. “Economic Choices.” American Economic Review91(3):351–78.
59.
McLachlanG.PeelD.. 2000. Finite Mixture Models. New York: John Wiley.
60.
NelsonG.BrahmG. N.. 2014. The Case against Academic Boycotts of Israel. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
OjeaE.LoureiroM.. 2007. “Altruistic, Egoistic and Biospheric Values in Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Wildlife.” Ecological Economics63:807–14.
63.
OppK.-D.1999. “Contending Conceptions of the Theory of Rational Action.” Journal of Theoretical Politics11:171–202.
64.
PeabodyD.1966. “Authoritarianism Scales and Response Bias.” Psychological Bulletin69:65–73.
65.
QuinleyH. E.Young GlockC.. 1979. Anti-semitism in America. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
66.
RoesselJ.SchenkP. H.. 2017. “How Political Is Political Consumption? The Case of Activism for the Global South and Fair Trade.” Social Problems65:266–84.
67.
ShahK. A. M.IbrahimH. I.. 2016. “The Impact of Consumer Boycott, Ethnocentrism and Patriotism in Malaysia.” The Social Sciences11:4622–27.
68.
StarrM. A.2009. “The Social Economics of Ethical Consumption: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Evidence.” The Journal of Socio-Economics38:916–25.
69.
StolleD.HoogheM.MichelettiM.. 2005. “Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation.” International Political Science Review26:245–69.
70.
ThurstoneL. L.1927. “A law of Comparative Judgment.” Psychological Review34:273–86.
71.
TutićA.LiebeU.. 2017. “Rational Choice.” Pp. 238–55 in Sage Handbook of Political Sociology, edited by OuthwaiteW.TurnerS.. London, England: Sage.
72.
VerbaS.BurnsN.Lehman SchlozmanK.. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” The Journal of Politics59:1051–72.
73.
VijA.WalkerJ. L.. 2016. “How, When and Why Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Models Are Latently Useful.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological90:192–217.
74.
VossT.AbrahamM.. 2000. “Rational Choice Theory in Sociology: A Survey.” Pp. 50–83 in The International Handbook of Sociology, edited by QuahS. R.SalesA.. London, England: Sage.
75.
WalkerJ.Ben-AkivaM.. 2001. “Extensions of the Random Utility Model.” Working Paper, MIT, MA.
76.
WallanderL.2009. “25 Years of Factorial Surveys in Sociology: A Review.” Social Science Research38:505–20.
77.
WistrichR. S.2010. A Lethal Obsession: Anti-semitism from Antiquity to the Global Jihad. New York: Random House.
78.
WittekR.SnijdersT.NeeV.., ed. 2012. Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
