Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

It is widely believed that regression models for binary responses are problematic if we want to compare estimated coefficients from models for different groups or with different explanatory variables. This concern has two forms. The first arises if the binary model is treated as an estimate of a model for an unobserved continuous response and the second when models are compared between groups that have different distributions of other causes of the binary response. We argue that these concerns are usually misplaced. The first of them is only relevant if the unobserved continuous response is really the subject of substantive interest. If it is, the problem should be addressed through better measurement of this response. The second concern refers to a situation which is unavoidable but unproblematic, in that causal effects and descriptive associations are inherently group dependent and can be compared as long as they are correctly estimated.

Keywords

logit models probit models regression modeling latent variables average treatment effects

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agresti

2002. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

Allison

P. D.

1999. “Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups.” Sociological Methods & Research 28:186–208.

Bartholomew

Knott

Moustaki

. 2011. Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis: A Unified Approach. 3rd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Berkson

1951. “Why I Prefer Logits to Probits.” Biometrics 7:327–39.

Breen

Holm

Karlson

K. B.

. 2014. “Correlations and Non-linear Probability Models.” Sociological Methods & Research 43:571–605.

Buis

M. L.

2017. “Logistic Regression: When Can We Do What We Think We Can Do?” Unpublished note, V. 3.1. Available from http://www.maartenbuis.nl/wp/odds_ratio_3.1.pdf.

Falconer

D. S.

1965. “The Inheritance of Liability to Certain Diseases, Estimated From the Incidence Among Relatives.” Annals of Human Genetics 29:51–76.

Finney

D. J.

1947. Probit Analysis: A Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Heath

A. F.

Cheung

S. Y.

, eds. 2007. Unequal Chances: Ethnic Minorities in Western Labour Markets. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

10.

Imbens

G. W.

Rubin

D. B.

. 2015. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Kleykamp

2013. “Unemployment, Earnings and Enrollment Among Post 9/11 Veterans.” Social Science Research 42:836–51.

12.

Luce

R. D.

Suppes

. 1965. “Preference, Utility, and Subjective Probability.” Pp. 249–410 in Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 3, edited by Luce

R. D.

Bush

R. R.

Galanter

E. H.

. New York: Wiley.

13.

Marks

G. N.

2014. Education, Social Background and Cognitive Ability: The Decline of the Social. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

14.

Marschak

1960. “Binary-choice Constraints and Random Utility Indicators.” Pp. 312–29 in Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959: Proceedings of the First Stanford Symposium, edited by Arrow

K. J.

Karlin

Suppes

. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

15.

McFadden

1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” Pp. 105–42 in Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by Zarembka

. New York: Academic Press.

16.

Millsap

R. E.

2011. Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. New York: Routledge.

17.

Mood

2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It.” European Sociological Review 26:67–82.

18.

Platt

2009. “Review of ‘Unequal Chances: Ethnic Minorities in Western Labour Markets’ by Heath and Cheung (eds.).” European Sociological Review 25:265–67.

19.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

. 2012. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. 3rd ed. Vol. II. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

20.

Rohwer

2012. “Estimating Effects With Logit Models.” NEPS Working Paper No.10, German National Educational Panel Study, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.

21.

Sikora

2015. “Gender Segregation in Australian Science Education: Contrasting Post-secondary VET With University.” Pp. 263–89 in Gender Segregation in Vocational Education, Number 31 in Comparative Social Research, edited by Imdorf

Hegna

Reisel

. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

22.

Swait

Louviere

. 1993. “The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models.” Journal of Marketing Research 30:305–14.

23.

Thurstone

L. L.

1927. “A Law of Comparative Judgment.” Psychological Review 34:273–86.

24.

Train

K. E.

2003. Discrete Choice Methods With Simulation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

25.

VanderWeele

T. J.

2015. Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press

26.

Williams

2009. “Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients across Groups.” Sociological Methods & Research 37:144–48.

On Group Comparisons With Logistic Regression Models

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References