BrubakerRogersFeischmidtMargitFoxJonGranceaLiana. 2006. Nationalist Politics and Everyday Ethnicity in a Transylvanian Town. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
CeruloKaren. 2014. “Re-assessing the Problem: Response to Jerolmack and Khan.”Sociological Methods and Research 43:219–26.
3.
ChangJae BongLuskJayson L.Bailey NorwoodF.. 2009. “How Closely Do Hypothetical Surveys and Laboratory Experiments Predict Field Behavior?”American Journal of Agricultural Economics91:518–34.
4.
CicourelAaron. 1964. Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: The Free Press.
5.
CicourelAaron. 2004. “I am NOT Opposed to Quantification or Formalization or Modeling, But Do Not Want to Pursue Quantitative Methods that Are Not Commensurate with the Research Phenomena Addressed: Aaron Cicourel in Conversation with Andreas Witzel and Günter Mey.”Forum: Qualitative Social Research5. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/549/1186. (accessed on February 7, 2014)
6.
DiMaggioPaul. 2014. “Comment on Jerolmack and Khan, ‘Talk is Cheap: Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy’.”Sociological Methods and Research 43:232–35.
7.
GarfinkelHarold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
GlasmanL. R.AlbarracinD.. 2006. “Forming Attitudes that Predict Future Behavior: A Meta-analysis of the Attitude-behavior Relation.”Psychological Bulletin132:778–822.
9.
HaneyCraigZimbardoPhilip G.. 2009. “Persistent Dispositionalism in Interactionist Clothing: Fundamental Attribution Error in Explaining Prison Abuse.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin35:807–14.
10.
HausmanJerry. 2012. “Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless.”Journal of Economic Perspectives25:43–56.
11.
KreuterFraukePresserStanleyTourangeauRoger. 2008. “Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity.”Public Opinion Quarterly72:847–65.
12.
LamontMichèle. 1992. Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-middle Class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
LevittSteven D.ListJohn A.. 2007. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal about the Real World?”The Journal of Economic Perspectives21:153–74.
ListJohn A.2006. “Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sportscards.”The American Economic Review91:1498–507.
16.
ListJohn A.2011. “Why Economists Should Conduct Field Experiments and 14 Tips for Pulling One Off.”Journal of Economic Perspectives25:3–16.
17.
MaynardDouglas. 2003. Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
MaynardDouglas. 2014. “News from Somewhere, News from Nowhere: On the Study of Interaction in Ethnographic Inquiry.”Sociological Methods and Research 43:210–18.
19.
MaynardDouglasSchaefferNora Cate. 2005. “Standardization-in-interaction: The Survey Interview.” Pp. 7–28 in Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, edited by DrewP.RaymondG.WeinbergD.. London: Sage.
20.
NorenzayanAraSchwarzNorbert. 1999. “Telling What They Want to Know: Participants Tailor Causal Attributions to Researchers’ Interests.”European Journal of Social Psychology29:1011–20.
21.
PagerDevahQuillianLincoln. 2005. “Walking the Talk? What Employers Say versus What They Do.”American Sociological Review70:355–80.
22.
RossLeeNisbettRichard E.. 1991. The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
SalganikMatthew J.LevyKaren E. C.. 2012. “Wiki Surveys: Open and Quantifiable Social Data Collection.”arXiv:1202.0500v1 [stat.AP]:1–29.
24.
SchegloffEmanuel A.1997. “Whose Text? Whose Context?”Discourse and Society8:165–87.
25.
SchwarzNorbert. 2006. “Attitude Research: Between Ockham’s Razor and the Fundamental Attribution Error.”Journal of Consumer Research33:19–21.
26.
SmithEliot R.SeminGün R.. 2007. “Situated Social Cognition.”Current Directions in Psychological Science16:132–35.
27.
TourangeauRogerYanTing. 2007. “Sensitive Questions in Surveys.”Psychological Bulletin133:859–83.
28.
VaiseyStephen. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-process Model of Culture in Action.”American Journal of Sociology114:1675–715.
29.
VaiseyStephen. 2014. “The ‘Attitudinal Fallacy’ Is a Fallacy: Why We Need Many Methods to Study Culture.”Sociological Methods and Research 43:227–31.
30.
YoungA. A.Jr2004. The Minds of Marginalized Black Men. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.