BielbyWilliam T.2003. “Declaration of William T. Bielby, Ph.D. in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification.” Dukes et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Case No. C-01-2252, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
3.
CorbinJulietStraussAnselm. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3d ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
CreswellJohn W.2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1993. 509 U.S. 579.
6.
Dukes et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 2004. Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s Motions to Strike Expert and Non-Expert Testimony. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Federal Rules Decisions222:189-200.
7.
FirebaughGlenn. 2008. Seven Rules for Social Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
KingGaryKeohaneRobert O.VerbaSidney S.1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
KuperAyeletLingardLorelieLevinsonWendy. 2008. “Critically Appraising Qualitative Research.” British Medical Journal337:687-92.
11.
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael. 1999. 526 U.S. 137.
12.
MaxwellJoseph A.2005. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 2d ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
MaxwellJoseph A.2009. “Designing a Qualitative Study.” 2nd ed. Pp.214-253 in The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, edited by BickmanLeonardRogDebra J.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
MilesMatthew B.HubermanA. Michael. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2d ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
MitchellGregoryMonahanJohnWalkerLaurens. 2011. “The ASA’s Missed Opportunity to Promote Sound Science in Court.” Sociological Methods & Research40:605-20.
16.
MitchellGregoryWalkerLaurensMonahanJohn. 2011. “Beyond Context: Social Facts as Case-Specific Evidence.” Emory Law Journal60:1109-55.
17.
MonahanJohnWalkerLaurens. 2010. Social Science in Law: Cases and Materials. 7th ed.New York, NY: Foundation Press.
18.
MonahanJohnWalkerLaurensMitchellGregory. 2008. “Contextual Evidence of Gender Discrimination: The Ascendance of ‘Social Frameworks.’” Virginia Law Review94:1705-39.
19.
MonahanJohnWalkerLaurensMitchellGregory. 2009. “The Limits of Social Framework Evidence.” Law, Probability and Risk8:307-21.
20.
NielsenLaura BethMyrickAmyWeinbergJill. 2011. “Siding with Science: In Defense of ASA’s Dukes vs. Wal-Mart Amicus Brief.” Sociological Methods & Research40:646-67.
21.
PrattMichael J.2008. “Fitting Oval Pegs Into Round Holes: Tensions in Evaluating and Publishing Qualitative Research in Top-Tier North American Journals.” Organizational Research Methods11:481-509.
22.
RaginCharles C.NagelJoanneWhitePatricia. 2004. Workshop on Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
23.
SaksMichael J.2000. “Banishing Ipse Dixit: The Impact of Kumho Tire on Forensic Identification Science.” Washington and Lee Law Review57:879-900.
24.
SaksMichael J.2003. “The Legal and Scientific Evaluation of Forensic Science (Especially Fingerprint Expert Testimony).” Seton Hall Law Review33:1167-87.
25.
SloboginChristopher. 2008. “Experts, Acts and Mental States.” Seton Hall Law Review38:1009-30.
