Least absolute deviation (LAD) is a well-known criterion to fit statistical models, but little is known about LAD estimation in structural equation modeling (SEM). To address this gap, the authors use the LAD criterion in SEM by minimizing the sum of the absolute deviations between the observed and the model-implied covariance matrices. Using Monte Carlo simulations, the authors compare the performance of this LAD estimator along several dimensions (bias, efficiency, convergence, frequencies of improper solutions, and absolute percentage deviation) to the full information maximum likelihood (ML) and unweighted least squares (ULS) estimators in structural equation modeling. The results for LAD are mixed: There are special conditions under which the LAD estimator outperforms ML and ULS, but the simulation evidence does not support a general claim that LAD is superior to ML and ULS in small samples.
Anderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing .1984. ``The Effect of Sampling Error on Convergence, Improper Solutions, and Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis.'' Psychometrika39:155-73.
2.
Bassett, Gilbert and Roger Koenker.1978. ``Asymptotic Theory of Least Absolute Error Regression.'' Journal of the American Statistical Association73:618-22.
3.
Bentler, Peter M. and Chih-Ping Chou.1987. ``Practical Issues in Structural Modeling .'' Sociological Methods & Research16:78-117.
4.
Bertsekas, Dimitri P.1999. Nonlinear Programming. Belmont, MA : Athena Scientific.
5.
Bollen, Kenneth A.1989. Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.
6.
Bollen, Kenneth A.1996. ``An Alternative 2SLS Estimator for Latent Variable Models .'' Psychometrika61:109-21.
7.
Boomsma, Anne and Jeffrey J. Hoogland .2001. ``The Robustness of LISREL Modeling Revisited.'' Pp. 139-68 in Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future, edited by R. Cudeck, S. H. C. du Toit, and D. Sörbom.Chicago: Scientific Software International.
8.
Browne, Michael W.1984. ``Asymptotically Distribution-Free Methods for the Analysis of Covariance Structures.'' British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology37:62-83.
9.
Chen, Feinian, Kenneth A. Bollen, Pamela Paxton, Patrick Curran, and James B. Kirby.2001. ``Improper Solutions in Structural Equation Models.'' Sociological Methods & Research29:468-508.
10.
Cheung, Gordon.2004. ``How Many Subjects? Revisiting the Sample Size Issue in Structural Equation Modeling.'' Presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
11.
Cudeck, Robert and Lisa L. O'Dell.1994. ``Applications of Standard Error Estimates in Unrestricted Factor Analysis: Significance Tests for Factor Loadings and Correlations.'' Psychological Bulletin115:475-87.
12.
Gerbing, David W. and James C. Anderson .1985. ``The Effects of Sampling Error and Model Characteristics on Parameter Estimation for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis.'' Multivariate Behavioral Research20:255-71.
13.
Gorsuch, Richard L.1983. Factor Analysis. 2d ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Greene, William H.2002. Econometric Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Hancock, Gregory R. and Ralph O. Mueller .2001. ``Rethinking Construct Reliability Within Latent Variable Systems.'' Pp. 195-216 in Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future, edited by R. Cudeck, S. H. C. du Toit, and D. Sörbom.Chicago: Scientific Software International.
16.
Harwood, Shane and Richard Scheines .2002. ``Genetic Algorithm Search Over Causal Models.'' Technical Report CMU-Phil-131. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
17.
Hershberger, Scott L.2003. ``The Growth of Structural Equation Modeling: 1994-2001 .'' Structural Equation Modeling10:35-46.
18.
Hill, Richard W. and Paul Holland.1977. ``Two Robust Alternatives to Least-Squares Regression.'' Journal of the American Statistical Association72:828-33.
19.
Jackson, Dennis L.2001. ``Sample Size and the Number of Parameter Estimates in Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Monte-Carlo Investigation .'' Structural Equation Modeling8:205-23.
20.
Jackson, Dennis L.2003. ``Revisiting Sample Size and Number of Parameter Estimates: Some Support for the N:q Hypothesis.'' Structural Equation Modeling10:128-41.
21.
Jöreskog, Karl G.1969. ``A General Approach to Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis.'' Psychometrika34:183-202.
22.
Jöreskog, Karl G. and Dag Sörbom.1996. LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
23.
Koenker, Roger and Gilbert Bassett .1982. ``Robust Tests for Heteroskedasticity Based on Regression Quantiles.'' Econometrica50:43-61.
24.
Lawley, D.N.1940. ``The Estimation of Factor Loadings by the Method of Maximum Likelihood.'' Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh60:64-82.
25.
MacCallum, Robert C., Michael W. Browne, and Hazuki M. Sugawara .1996. ``Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling.'' Psychological Methods1:130-49.
26.
MacCallum, Robert C., Keith F. Widaman, Shaobo Zhang , and Sehee Hong.1999. ``Sample Size in Factor Analysis.'' Psychological Methods4:84-99.
27.
Marcoulides, George A. and Zvi Drezner.2001. ``Specification Searches in Structural Equation Models With a Genetic Algorithm.'' Pp. 154-64 in New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling, edited by G. A. Marcoulides and R. E. Schumacker.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Marsh, Herbert W., John R. Balla, and Roderick P. McDonald .1988. ``Goodness of Fit Indexes in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The Effect of Sample Size.'' Psychological Bulletin103:391-410.
29.
Marsh, Herbert W., Kit-Tai Hau, John R. Balla, and David Grayson.1998. ``Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators Per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis.'' Multivariate Behavioral Research33:181-220.
30.
Matsueda, Ross L. and William T. Bielby .1986. ``Statistical Power in Covariance Structure Models.'' Sociological Methodology16:120-58.
31.
Mueller, Ralph O.1997. ``Structural Equation Modeling: Back to the Basics.'' Structural Equation Modeling4:353-69.
32.
Muthén, Linda K. and Bengt O. Muthén .2002. ``How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power.'' Structural Equation Modeling9:599-620.
33.
Paxton, Pamela, Patrick Curran, Kenneth A. Bollen, Jim Kirby, and Feinian Chen.2001. ``Monte Carlo Experiments: Design and Implementation.'' Structural Equation Modeling8:287-312.
34.
Portnoy, Stephen and Roger Koenker.1997. ``The Gaussian Hare and the Laplacian Tortoise: Computability of Squared-Error Versus Absolute-Error Estimators.'' Statistical Science12:279-300.
35.
Rogers, William H.1993. ``sg11.2: Calculation of Quantile Regression Standard Errors.'' Stata Technical Bulletin13:8-9.
36.
Shapiro, Alexander.1983. ``Asymptotic Distribution Theory in the Analysis of Covariance Structures (A Unified Approach).'' South African Statistical Journal37:62-83.
37.
Storn, Rainer and Ken Price.1997. ``Differential Evolution—A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization Over Continuous Spaces.'' Journal of Global Optimization11: 341-59.
38.
Tanaka, J.S.1987. ``How Big Is Big Enough: Sample Size and Goodness of Fit in Structural Equation Models With Latent Variables.'' Child Development58:134-46.
39.
Velicer, Wayne F. and Joseph L. Fava.1998. ``Effects of Variable and Subject Sampling on Factor Pattern Recovery.'' Psychological Methods3:231-51.
