Respondents' attitudes toward audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (audio-CASI) relative to personal interviewing and comparability of reporting of the number of sex partners in the past year were assessed using the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used. Few women indicated that the personal interview, relative to audio-CASI, provided more honest answers or greater comfort. However, minority group members, especially Hispanics, were more likely to prefer personal interviews. Most women (83.4 percent) provided consistent reports of number of sex partners on the two modes, 12.6 percent reported more sex partners with audio-CASI, and 4.0 percent reported more partners in the personal interview. Hispanic women and women of “other” race/ethnicity were significantly more likely to have decreased reporting of sex partners with audio-CASI. Further methodologic research is needed on mode effects among minority populations. Reporting errors associated with the data collection technology could obscure important findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abma, Joyce C.
, Anjani Chandra, William D. Mosher, Linda S. Peterson, and Linda J. Piccinino. 1997. “Fertility, Family Planning, and Women's Health: New Data From the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.”Vital and Health Statistics23(19):1-114.
2.
Aquilino, William S.
and Leonard A. LoSciuto. 1990. “Effects of Interview Mode on Self-Reported Drug Use.”Public Opinion Quarterly54:362-395.
3.
Bloom, David E.1998. “Technology, Experimentation, and the Quality of Survey Data.”Science280:847-848.
4.
Caspar, Rachel, Allen Duffer, and Donna Jewell. 1998. “ACASI Issues for Cycle VI of the NSFG: Final Report.”National Survey of Family Growth: Professional Services Contract. Prepared for the National Center for Health Statistics.
5.
Catania, Joseph A.
, David R. Gibson, Dale D. Chitwood, and Thomas J. Coates. 1990. “Methodological Problems in AIDS Behavioral Research: Influences on Measurement Error and Participation Bias in Studies of Sexual Behavior.”Psychological Bulletin108: 339-362.
6.
Current Population Survey. 1997. Special Tabulations (via Ferret). Retrieved December 13, 1997, from www.census.gov.
7.
DeMaio, Teresa J.1984. “Social Desirability and Survey Measurement: A Review.” Pp. 257-281 in Surveying Subjective Phenomena, vol. 2, edited by C. F. Turner and E. Martin. New York: Russell Sage.
8.
Des Jarlais, Don C.
, Denise Paone, Judith Milliken, Charles F. Turner, Heather Miller, James Gribble, Qiuhu Shi, Holly Hagan, and Samuel R. Friedman. 1999. “Audio-Computer Interviewing to Measure Risk Behaviour for HIV Among Injecting Drug Users: A Quasi-Randomised Trial.”Lancet353:1657-1661.
9.
Duffer, Allen P.
, Judith T. Lessler, Michael F. Weeks, and William D. Mosher. 1996. “Impact of Incentives and Interviewing Modes: Results From the National Survey of Family Growth Cycle V Pretest.” Pp. 147-151 in Health Survey Research Methods: Conference Proceedings, edited by R. Warnecke. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
10.
Fu, Haishan
, Jacqueline E. Darroch, Stanley K. Henshow, and Elizabeth Kolb. 1998. “Measuring the Extent of Abortion Underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.”Family Planning Perspectives30(3):128-133.
11.
Groves, Robert M.1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Guadagno, Mary Ann
, Joyce C. Abma, Anjani Chandra, Kathy A. London, Linda S. Peterson, Linda J. Piccinino, and Jacqueline B. Wilson. 1994. “Women's Reports of Sensitive Health Conditions, Attitudes and Behaviors.” Pp. 82-87 in 1994 Proceedings of the Government Statistics Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
13.
Jobe, Jared B.
, William F. Pratt, Roger Tourangeau, Alison K. Baldwin, and Kenneth A. Rasinski. 1998. “Effects of Interview Mode on Sensitive Questions in a Fertility Survey.” Pp. 311-329 in Survey Measurement and Process Quality, edited by L. E. Lyberg, P. P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. D. de Leeuw, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin. New York: John Wiley.
14.
Judkins, David R.
, William D. Mosher, and Steven Botman. 1991. “National Survey of Family Growth: Design, Estimation, and Inference.”Vital and Health Statistics2(109):1-52.
15.
Kelly, Janice E.
, William D. Mosher, Allen P. Duffer, and Susan H. Kinsey. 1997. “Plan and Operation of the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.”Vital and Health Statistics1(36):1-89.
16.
Lessler, Judith T.
and James M. O'Reilly. 1997. “Mode of Interview and Reporting of Sensitive Issues: Design and Implementation of Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing.”NIDA Research Monograph167:366-382.
17.
Lessler, Judith T.
, Michael F. Weeks, and James M. O'Reilly. 1994. “Results From the National Survey of Family Growth Cycle V Pretest.” Pp. 64-70 in 1994 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
18.
Locke, Steven E.
, Hollis B. Kowaloff, Robert G. Hoff, Charles Safran, Mark A. Popovsky, Deborah J. Cotton, Dianne M. Finkelstein, Peter L. Page, and Warner V. Slack. 1992. “Computer-Based Interview for Screening Blood-Donors for Risk of HIV Transmission.”Journal of the American Medical Association268:1301-1305.
19.
Rieger, S.
, D. Judkins, and S. Sperry. 1991. National Survey of Family Growth: Cycle IV CATI Phase, Final Report. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
20.
Robinson, Rachael
, and Robert West. 1992. “A Comparison of Computer and Questionnaire Methods of History-Taking in a Genito-Urinary Clinic.”Psychology and Health6:77-84.
21.
StataCorp
. 1999. Stata Statistical Software: Release 5.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
22.
Tourangeau, Roger
, Jared B. Jobe, William F. Pratt, and Kenneth Rasinski. 1997. “Design and Results of the Women's Health Study.”NIDA Research Monograph167:344-365.
23.
Tourangeau, Roger
, Kenneth Rasinski, Jared B. Jobe, Tom W. Smith, and William F. Pratt. 1997. “Sources of Error in a Survey on Sexual Behavior.”Journal of Official Statistics13:341-365.
24.
Turner C. F.
, L. Ku, S. M. Rogers, L. D. Lindberg, J. H. Pleck, and F. L. Sonenstein. 1998. “Adolescent Sexual Behavior, Drug Use, and Violence: Increased Reporting With Computer Survey Technology.”Science280:867-873.
25.
Willis, Gordon B., Monroe G. Sirken, and Gail Nathan. 1994. “The Cognitive Aspects of Responses to Sensitive Survey Questions.” Cognitive Methods Staff Working Paper Series No. 9.
