To understand children's development, one must examine an array of constructs. Yet the time and budget constraints of large-scale survey research create a dilemma: how to cut scales to the fewest possible items while still retaining their predictive properties. In this article, the authors compare the predictive validity of several shortened versions of the Behavior Problems Index and the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment-Short Form with their full scales within the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth-1979 cohort. They use the scales to predict delinquency, reading recognition scores, parent-child activities, and smoking behavior of children at ages 13 or 14 from data gathered 2, 4, and 6 years prior. Analyses leave the authors cautiously optimistic that short scales, especially scales composed of items gathered at different time points and repeated regularly, may enjoy substantial predictive power. However, two-item scales may be too short, and psychometric study on additional scales is warranted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achenbach, Thomas M. 1996, February 7. Development of a Mental Health Indicator for Children for the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Redesigned Questionnaire. Unpublished draft prepared for the National Center for Health Statistics under professional services contract DHHS NCH50009530371.
2.
Achenbach, Thomas M.
and Craig Edelbrock. 1987. The Manual for the Youth Self-Report and Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont.
3.
Baker, Paula C.
, Canada K. Keck, Frank L. Mott, and Stephen V. Quinlan. 1993. The NLSY Child Handbook, Revised Edition: A Guide to the 1986-1990 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth-Child Data. Columbus, OH: Center for Human Resource Research.
4.
Boyce, W. Thomas
, Eric W. Jensen, Sherman A. James, and James L. Peacock. 1983. “The Family Routines Inventory: Theoretical Origins.”Social Science and Medicine17: 193-200.
5.
Bradley, Robert H.
and Bettye M. Caldwell. 1979. “Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A Revision of the Preschool Scale.”American Journal of Mental Deficiency84:235-244.
6.
Bridges, Lisa J.1996. Memo to Kristin Moore, December 18, 1996. Riverside, CA: Institute for Research and Reform in Education.
7.
Bronfenbrenner, Urie
. 1977. “Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development.”American Psychologist32:513-530.
8.
Bronfenbrenner, Urie
. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development. Boston: Harvard University Press.
9.
Bronfenbrenner, Urie
. 1986. “Ecology of the Family as a Context for Human Development: Research Perspectives.”Developmental Psychology22:723-742.
10.
Bronfenbrenner, Urie
. 1989. “Ecological Systems Theory.” Pp. 187-249 in Annals of Child Development, vol. 6, edited by Ross Vasta. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
11.
Bronfenbrenner, Urie
and Stephen J. Ceci. 1994. “Nature-Nurture Reconceptualized in Developmental Perspective: A Bioecological Model.”Psychological Review101: 568-586.
12.
Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne
, Brett Brown, Greg J. Duncan, and Kristin A. Moore. 1995. “Child Development in the Context of Family and Community Resources: An Agenda for National Data Collections.” Pp. 27-97 in Integrating Federal Statistics on Children: Report of a Workshop, edited by National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13.
Cairns, Robert B.
, Jean-Louis Gariepy, and Kathryn E. Hood. 1990. “Development, Microevolution, and Social Behavior.”Psychological Review97(1):49-65.
14.
Caldwell, Bettye M.
and Robert H. Bradley. 1984. Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment [Administration manual]. Rev. ed.Little Rock: University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
15.
Day, Randall D.
, Stephen M. Gavazzi, and Alan Acock. 1997. “Identifying and Measuring Compelling Family Processes.” Paper developed for the Workshop on Research Ideas and Data Needs for Studying the Well-Being of Children and Families, Airlie Center, Warrenton, VA, October.
16.
Dubow, Eric F.
and Tom Luster. 1990. “Adjustment of Children Born to Teenage Mothers: The Contribution of Risk and Protective Factors.”Journal of Marriage and the Family52:394-404.
17.
Ehrle, Jennifer
and Kristin Anderson Moore. 1999. NSAF Methodology Report No. 6: Benchmarking Measures of Child and Family Well-Being. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Also available at http://newfederalism.urban.org/nsaf/methodology1997.html
18.
Hetherington, E. Mavis
, Margaret Bridges, and Glendessa M. Insabella. 1998. “What Matters? What Does Not? Five Perspectives on the Association Between Marital Transitions and Children's Adjustment.”American Psychologist53:167-184.
19.
McHorney, Colleen A.
, John E. Ware, Jr., and Anastasia Raczek. 1993. “The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs.”Medical Care31:247-263.
20.
Menaghan, Elizabeth G.
and Toby L. Parcel. 1991. “Determining Children's Home Environments: The Impact of Maternal Characteristics and Current Occupational and Family Conditions.”Journal of Marriage and the Family53:417-431.
21.
Moore, Kristin Anderson
, Martha J. Zaslow, Mary J. Coiro, Suzanne M. Miller, and Ellen B. Magenheim. 1995. How Well Are They Faring? AFDC Families With Preschool-Aged Children in Atlanta at the Outset of the JOBS Evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Also available at http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/hsp/cyp/jobchdxs.htm
22.
Nagelkerke, N.J.D.1991. A Note on a General Definition of the Coefficient of Determination. Biometrika78:691-692.
23.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine
. 2000. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Child Development, edited by Jack P. Shonkoff and Deborah A. Phillips. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24.
Parcel, Toby L.
and Elizabeth G. Menaghan. 1988. Measuring Behavioral Problems in a Large Cross-Sectional Survey: Reliability and Validity for Children in the NLS Youth. Columbus: The Ohio State University, Department of Sociology.
25.
Parcel, Toby L.
and Elizabeth G. Menaghan. 1989. Child Home Environment as a Mediating Construct Between SES and Child Outcomes. Columbus: The Ohio State University, Department of Sociology.
26.
Parcel, Toby L.
and Elizabeth G. Menaghan. 1994. “Early Parental Work, Family Social Capital, and Early Childhood Outcomes.”American Journal of Sociology99:972-1009.
27.
Quint, Janet C.
, Denise F. Polit, Hans Bos, and George Cave. 1994. New Chance: Interim Findings on a Comprehensive Program for Disadvantaged Young Mothers and Their Children. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
28.
Sugland, Barbara W.
, Martha J. Zaslow, Judith R. Smith, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Deborah Coates, Connie Blumenthal, Kristin A. Moore, Terri Griffin, and Robert H. Bradley. 1995. “The Early Childhood HOME Inventory and HOME-Short Form in Differing Racial/Ethnic Groups. Are There Differences in Underlying Structure, Internal Consistency of Subscales, and Patterns of Prediction?”Journal of Family Issues16:632-663.
29.
Zaslow, Martha J.
, Carrie L. Mariner, Kristin A. Moore, Christopher Botsko, Barbara Sugland, Marjorie L. Gunnoe, and Tawanda Greer. 1998. “Goals and Methods of the Pilot Test for a New Survey Measure of Mother-Child Relations in Middle Childhood.” Methods Working Paper # 98.8. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
30.
Zill, Nicholas
. 1991. The Behavior Problems Index. Descriptive Material. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
