The erstwhile untouchable castes are still the mainstay of sanitation labour in South Asia. The sanitation sector has largely remained manual without mechanisation. This article focusses on the continuance of manual scavenging (use of bare hands to clean human excreta) and sweeping without appropriate technological aids in the unique context of South Asia. Drawing from fieldwork conducted in Mumbai city (June–October 2021) that included conversations with 15 sanitation workers, the article highlights several following issues. First, the denial of basic labour rights to sanitation labourers is the result of the outsourcing by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to private agencies, which employ them on a contractual and informal basis. Second, there is a significant transition and change in the life of labourers from the Buddhist (earlier called Mahar) castes of Maharashtra as compared to their native villages. The functioning of caste in modern-day Mumbai has become more indirect and subtle, but the link between caste and sanitation labour is far from broken. Third, sanitation workers both oppose and claim their labour and occupation. This reflects in their fight and struggle against the corrupt practices of contractors and officers and simultaneously in their claim for becoming permanent workers in order to access better wages, working conditions, and facilities.
AnjariaJ. S. (2011). Ordinary states: Everyday corruption and the politics of space in Mumbai. American Ethnologist, 38(1), 58–72.
2.
BaliS. (2017). Washing away the stereotypes. Financial Express. www.financialexpress.com
3.
ChakrabartyD. (1992). Of garbage, modernity and the citizen’s gaze. Economic & Political Weekly, 27(10/11), 541–547.
4.
CoffeyD., & SpearsD. (2017). Where India goes: Abandoned toilets, stunted development and the costs of caste. Harper Collins.
5.
DarokarS. (2019). Manual scavengers: A blind spot in urban development discourse. In SekherM. & CarciumaruR. (Eds.), Including the excluded in South Asia (pp. 209–218). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9759-3_13
6.
DerridaJ. (1987). Geschlecht II: Heidegger’s hand (Trans. J. Leavey). In SallisS. (Ed.), Deconstruction and philosophy (pp. 161–196). University of Chicago Press. https://www.artwithross.com/uploads/2/9/0/8/29087093/geschlecht2_-_heideggers_hand.pdf
7.
DouglasM. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo (1st ed.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8.
DubeyS., & MurphyJ. (2020). Manual scavenging in Mumbai: The systems of oppression. Humanity and Society, 20(10), 1–23.
9.
Education Department, Government of Maharashtra. (2013). Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar writings and speeches (BAWS) (Vol. 7).
10.
Education Department, Government of Maharashtra. (2020). Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar writings and speeches (BAWS) (Vol. 10).
11.
FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.
12.
FreyC. B. (2019). The technology trap: Capital, labour and power in the age of automation. Princeton University Press.
13.
GandhiM. K. (1936, November28). The ideal Bhangi. In The collected works of Mahatma K. Gandhi. Publication Division of Government of India.
14.
GandhiM. K. (1939). Hind swaraj, or, Indian home rule. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House.
15.
GrantA. E. (1894). The Indian manual of hygiene: Being King’s Madras manual of hygiene (Vol. 1). Higginbotham and Co.
16.
GuptaA. (2017). Changing forms of corruption in India. Modern Asian Studies. 51(6),1862–1890.
17.
HarawayD. (1991). The cyborg manifesto. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
18.
HathiP., & SrivastavN. (2020). Caste prejudice and infection: Why a dangerous lack of hygiene persists in government hospitals. Economic & Political Weekly, 55(16), 38–44.
19.
HeideggerM. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. Harper & Row.
20.
JagtapA. (2021). Business opportunities in community toilets. Clean India Journal. www.cleanindiajournal.com/business-opportunities-in-community-toilets/
21.
JasanoffS. (2017). Science and democracy. In FeltUlrike, FoucheR., MillerC. A. and Smith-DoerrL. (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 259–288). The MIT Press.
22.
JohariA. (2014, December6). How Indian firms use dirty tricks to deny sanitation workers their rights. Scroll.in. https://scroll.in/article/692846/how-indian-firms-use-dirty-tricks-to-deny-sanitation-workers-their-rights
23.
JohariA. (2017, April11). Victory for 2,700 sanitation workers in Mumbai as Supreme Court grants them permanent jobs. Scroll.in. https://scroll.in/article/834168/victory-for-2700-sanitation-workers-in-mumbai-as-supreme-court-grants-them-permanent-jobs
24.
KadlakH., SalveP., & KarwadeP. (2019). Intersectionality of caste, gender and occupation: A study of safai karamchari women in Maharashtra. Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 11(2), 130–138.
25.
KasaleP. (2020, February5). BMC, the richest civic body, is getting richer at the cost of projects. Mid-day. https://www.mid-day.com/mumbai/mumbai-news/article/bmc-the-riches-civic-body-is-getting-richer-at-the-cost-of-projects-22547171
26.
KavirajS. (1997). Filth and the public sphere: Concepts and practices about space in Calcutta. Public Culture, 10(1), 83–113.
27.
LathamB. (1897). Indian sanitation. Journal of the Sanitary Institute, 18(1), 93–109.
28.
LeeJ. (2017). Odour and order: How caste is inscribed in space and sensoria. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 37(3), 470–490.
29.
Leroi-GourhanA. (1993). Gesture and speech (Trans. BergerAnna B.). The MIT Press.
30.
MalkaniN. R. (1965). Clean people and an unclean country. Sub-committee for Social Programmes, National Committee for the Gandhi Centenary.
31.
ManderH. (2016, July27). Is it sacrilege for upper-castes to clean toilets?Hindustan Times. https://www.hindustantimes.com/columns/is-it-sacrilege-for-upper-castes-to-clean-toilets/story-woNZFn9j3NIp45udeKNGsO.html
32.
MarxK. (1977). Das capital (Vol. 1). Progress Publishers.
33.
MasselosJ. (1982). Jobs and jobbery: The sweeper in Bombay under the Raj. The Indian Economic and Social History Review, 19(2), 101–139.
NairS. (2018, September18). One manual scavenging death every five days: Official data. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/official-data-shows-one-manual-scavenging-death-every-five-days-5361531/
36.
NigamD. D. (2018, October12). Machines will clean manholes not stigma attached to it. Round Table India. https://www.roundtableindia.co.in/machines-will-clean-manholes-not-stigma-attached-with-manual-scavengers/
37.
PrashadV. (1995). Marks of capital: Colonialism and the sweepers of Delhi. International Review of Social History, 40(1), 1–30.
38.
RamaswamyG. (2005). India stinking: Manual scavengers in Andhra Pradesh and their work. Navayana.
39.
RiisS. (2011). Towards the origin of modern technology: Reconfiguring Martin Heidegger’s thinking. Continental Philosophy Review, 44(1), 103–117.
40.
RodriguesV. (2009). Untouchability, filth, and the public domain. In GuruG. (Ed.), Humiliation: Claims and context. Oxford University Press.
41.
Safai Karmachari Andolan. (n.d.). Who is involved in manual scavenging. https://www.safaikarmachariandolan.org/crisis
42.
SahooS. (2020). Recast(e)ing scientific temper in a democracy: The eccentricities of Ambedkarian science. Sociological Bulletin, 69(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920923206
43.
StieglerB. (1998). Technics and time: The fault of Epimetheus (Trans. BeardsworthRichard & CollinsGeorge). Stanford University Press.
44.
StieglerB. (2016). Automatic society: Vol. 1—The future of work (Trans. RossDaniel). PressPolity.
45.
TiwariA., & SharmaP. (2024). Socio-technical transformations of Indore’s waste management. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 33(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijewm.2024.135878
46.
TNN. (2018, May31). ‘General’ candidates line up for sanitation jobs. Times of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/
47.
TripathiT. (2012). Safai karmi scheme of Uttar Pradesh: Caste dominance continues. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(37), 26–29.
48.
VishvanathanS. (2019, April29). How we have failed the manual scavenger. And Gandhi. The Tribune. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/perspective/how-we-have-failed-the-manual-scavenger-and-gandhi-839712/
49.
VishvesvarayaM. (1920). Reconstructing India. PS King and Sons Limited.
50.
WachaD. E. (1913). Rise and growth of Bombay municipal government. GA Natesan and Company.
51.
WaghmoreS. (2013). Civility against caste: Dalit politics and citizenship in western India. Sage Publications.
52.
WinnerL. (1980). Do artifacts have politics?Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.
53.
WittmerJ. (2022). Dirty work in the clean city: An embodied urban political ecology of women informal recyclers’ work in the ‘clean city’. Environment and Planning, 6(2), 1343–1365. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221102374
54.
Yuvraj, PrakashN., & BalaP. (2022). From manholes to roboholes: A technology-based solution for sanitation workers. Contemporary Voice of Dalit. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455328X221132969
