Human trafficking is the fastest growing international criminal industry, which disproportionately affects women and children. To monitor the crime, the U.S. Department of State places each country into one of four tiers based on governmental anti-trafficking efforts. This study explores how women in government can influence these efforts. It is hypothesised that women serving in government have two effects—a direct and indirect effect—on a country’s tier ranking. The direct effect is defined as female politicians advocating for anti-trafficking policy. Female politicians are also linked to lower corruption, which indirectly serves to enhance anti-trafficking efforts. The analysis results indicate that the direct effect is identified when women in government are measured as female political power representation but is not found when women in government are measured as simply female political representation. The indirect effect is found in both cases.
AkeeR., BasuA. K., BediA., & ChauN. H. (2014). Transnational trafficking, law enforcement, and victim protection: A middleman trafficker’s perspective. The Journal of Law and Economics, 57(2), 349–386.
2.
AkeeR. K., BasuA. K., ChauN. H., & KhamisM. (2010). Chapter 28 Ethnic fragmentation, conflict, displaced persons and human trafficking: An empirical analysis. In EpsteinG. S. & GangI. N. (Eds.), Migration and culture (pp. 691–716). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
3.
AlatasV., CameronL., ChaudhuriA., ErkalN., & GangadharanL. (2009). Gender, culture, and corruption: Insights from an experimental analysis. Southern Economic Journal, 75(3), 663–680.
ArfaouiK., & MoghadamV. M. (2016). Violence against women and Tunisian feminism: Advocacy, policy, and politics in an Arab context. Current Sociology, 64(4), 637–653.
6.
BalesK. (2007). What predicts human trafficking?International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 31(2), 269–279.
7.
BarnerJ. R., OkechD., & CampM. A. (2014). Socio-Economic inequality, human trafficking, and the global slave trade. Societies, 4(2), 148–160.
8.
BauhrM., CharronN., & WängnerudL. (2019). Exclusion or interests? Why females in elected office reduce petty and grand corruption. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1043–1065.
9.
BurkeM. C., AmayaB., & DillonK. (2020). Sex trafficking as structural gender-based violence: Overview and trauma implications. In WinterdykJ. & JonesJ. (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of human trafficking (pp. 451–465). Palgrave Macmillan Cham.
10.
CarollS. (2002). Congresswomen’s perceptions of their representational roles. In RosenthalC. S. (Ed.), Representing women: Women transforming Congress (pp. 50–68). University of Oklahoma Press.
11.
ChattopadhyayR., & DufloE. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443.
12.
ChoS. Y. (2012). Modeling for determinants of human trafficking (Working Paper No. 70). Economics of Security Working Paper. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/119396
13.
ChoS. Y. (2015). Modelling for determinants of human trafficking. Social Inclusion, 3, 2–21. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2117838
14.
ChoS. Y., DreherA., & NeumayerE. (2014). Determinants of anti-trafficking policies: Evidence from a new index. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116(2), 429–454.
15.
Council on Foreign Relations. (2021). Women’s power index. Women and Foreign Policy Program. https://www.cfr.org/article/womens-power-index#chapter-title-0-5
16.
Cowell-MeyersK. (2001). Gender, peace, and power. Women & Politics, 23(3), 57–90.
17.
DandurandY. (2017). Human trafficking and police governance. Police Practice and Research, 18(3), 322–336.
18.
D’CunhaJ. (2002, November18–22). Trafficking in persons: A gender and rights perspective. In Report of the Expert Group Meeting: Trafficking in women and girls. https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/trafficking2002/reports/Finalreport.PDF
19.
DengL. B. (2005). The challenge of cultural, ethnic and religious diversity in peacebuilding and constitution-making in post-conflict Sudan. Civil Wars, 7(3), 258–269.
20.
DollarD., FismanR., & GattiR. (2001). Are women really the ‘fairer’ sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46, 423–429https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00169-X
21.
EggersA. C., VivyanN., & WagnerM. (2018). Corruption, accountability, and gender: Do female politicians face higher standards in public life?The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 321–326.
22.
EsareyJ., & ChrilloG. (2013). “Fairer sex” or purity myth? Corruption, gender, and institutional context. Politics & Gender, 9(4), 361–389.
23.
GuthA. P. (2010). Human trafficking in the Philippines: The need for an effective anti-corruption program. Trends in Organized Crime, 13(2–3), 147–166.
24.
HernandezD., & RudolphA. (2015). Modern day slavery: What drives human trafficking in Europe?European Journal of Political Economy, 38, 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.02.002
25.
HessamiZ., & da FonsecaM. L. (2020). Female political representation and substantive effects on policies: A literature review. European Journal of Political Economy, 63, 101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101896
26.
International Labour Organization. (2022). Global estimates of modern slavery: Forced labour and forced marriage. https://www.ilo.org/publications/major-publications/global-estimates-modern-slavery-forced-labour-and-forced-marriage
27.
Jac-KucharskiA. (2012). The determinants of human trafficking: A US case study. International Migration, 50(6), 150–165.
28.
JonssonS. (2019). The complex relationship between police corruption and sex trafficking in origin countries. Journal of Human Trafficking, 5(2), 109–129.
29.
KaufmannD., KraayA., & MastruzziM. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.
30.
KeechW. R. (1972). Linguistic diversity and political conflict: Some observations based on four Swiss cantons. Comparative Politics, 4(3), 387–404.
31.
KendallV. M. (2011). Greasing the palm: An argument for an increased focus on public corruption in the fight against international human trafficking. Cornell Int’l LJ, 44, 33. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/cintl44&div=8&id=&page=
32.
LandmanT., & LarizzaM. (2009). Inequality and human rights: Who controls what, when, and how. International Studies Quarterly, 53(3), 715–736.
33.
MalikhaoP., MalikhaoP., & ServaesF. (2017). Human trafficking in Thailand: A culture of corruption. InCulture and Communication in Thailand (pp. 117–125). Springer.
34.
McCrightA. M., & XiaoC. (2014). Gender and environmental concern: Insights from recent work and for future research. Society & Natural Resources, 27(10), 1109–1113.
35.
MoC. H. (2018). Perceived relative deprivation and risk: An aspiration-based model of human trafficking vulnerability. Political Behavior, 40(1), 247–277.
36.
NovtaN. (2016). Ethnic diversity and the spread of civil war. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(5), 1074–1100.
37.
PorterE. (2003). Women, political decision-making, and peace-building. Global Change, Peace & Security, 15(3), 245–262.
38.
RijnhartJ. J., LampS. J., ValenteM. J., MacKinnonD. P., TwiskJ. W., & HeymansM. W. (2021). Mediation analysis methods used in observational research: A scoping review and recommendations. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21, 1–17. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-021-01426-3
39.
RivasF. M. (2013). An experiment on corruption and gender. Bulletin of Economic Research, 65(1), 10–42.
40.
RohwerA. (2009). Measuring corruption: A comparison between the transparency international corruption perceptions index and the World Bank’s worldwide governance indicators. CESifo DICE Report, 7(3), 42–52. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/166975/1/ifo-dice-report-v07-y2009-i3-p42-52.pdf
41.
Rose-AckermanS. (2008). Corruption and government. International Peacekeeping, 15(3), 328–343.
42.
Sacco StudnickaA. C. (2010). Corruption and human trafficking in Brazil: Findings from a multi-modal approach. European Journal of Criminology, 7(1), 29–43.
43.
SangheraJ. (2017). Unpacking the trafficking discourse. In KempadooK., SangheraJ. & PattanaikB. (Eds.), Trafficking and prostitution reconsidered (pp. 3–24). Routledge.
44.
SchönhöferJ. (2017). Political determinants of efforts to protect victims of human trafficking. Crime, Law and Social Change, 67(2), 153–185.
45.
SegraveM. (2009). Human trafficking and human rights. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 14(2), 71–94.
46.
SwamyA., KnackS., LeeY., & AzfarO. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25–55.
47.
SwersM. L. (1998). Are women more likely to vote for women’s issue bills than their male colleagues?Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23(3), 435–448.
48.
TorglerB., & ValevN. T. (2006). Corruption and age. Journal of Bioeconomics, 8, 133–145. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10818-006-9003-0
49.
UddinM. B. (2014). Human trafficking in South Asia: Issues of corruption and human security. International Journal of Social Work and Human Services Practice, 2(1), 18–27.
50.
United Nations. (n.d.). Human trafficking. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/human-Trafficking/Human-Trafficking.html
51.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2007). The global initiative to fight human trafficking. https://www.unodc.org/pdf/gift%20brochure.pdf
52.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2020). Global report on trafficking in persons 2020. https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/tip/2021/GLOTiP_2020_15jan_web.pdf
53.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (n.d.). What is human trafficking?https://www.dhs.gov/blue-campaign/what-human-trafficking
54.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2022). Countering human trafficking: A year in review. Center for Countering Human Trafficking. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2022-02/CCHT%20Annual%20Report.pdf
55.
U.S. Department of State. (2022). Trafficking in persons report. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/337308-2022-TIP-REPORT-inaccessible.pdf
56.
ValenteM. J., RijnhartJ. J., SmythH. L., MunizF. B., & MacKinnonD. P. (2020). Causal mediation programs in R, M plus, SAS, SPSS, and Stata. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(6), 975–984.
57.
Van DijkJ., & Klerx-Van MierloF. (2014). Quantitative indices for anti-human trafficking policies: Based on reports of the US State Department and the Council of Europe. Crime, Law and Social Change, 61, 229–250. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10611-013-9510-6
58.
VoldenC., WisemanA. E., & WittmerD. E. (2018). Women’s issues and their fates in the US congress. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(4), 679–696.
59.
WängnerudL. (2009). Women in parliaments: Descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science, 12(1), 51–69.
60.
WatsonJ., & SilkstoneC. (2006). Human trafficking as a form of gender-based violence—Protecting the victim. Agenda, 20(70), 110–118.
61.
World Bank. (n.d.). Worldwide Governance Indicators. FAQs. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#faq
62.
ZhangS. X., & PinedaS. L. (2008). Corruption as a causal factor in human trafficking. InOrganized crime: Culture, markets and policies (pp. 41–55). Springer New York.
