Social Identity of an Ancestral Religious Group: A Study of the Hamai People in Northeast India

Abstract

An ancestral group, with a native religion, views its religion from a strictly confined group’s identity perspective. This narrowly confined identity narrative of their origin, rooted in their relationship with their proto-ancestor’s creator, contributes towards their belief systems that naturally precludes all other groups and thus results in a cautiously guarded religion of their ancestral group. The social identity process of religion shields it from evolving into a more universal belief system that cuts across cultures and languages. Nevertheless, the social identity process of the religion of an ancestral group is certainly a phenomenon that allows one to better comprehend the various intricate dynamics within an ancestral group and their inter-group dynamics. The article is contextualised within an ancestral group known as Hamai who come under Zeliangrong, an organisation formed for the socio-economic and political objectives of a section of the Hamai people of Manipur, Nagaland and Assam.

Keywords

Religion social identity ancestry ethnicity Zeliangrong Hamai Manipur Nagaland Assam

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arora

(2013). The paradox of democracy in the northeast and the eastern Himalayas. In Arora

& Jayaram

(Eds.), Routeing democracy in the Himalayas: Experiments and experiences (pp. 101–132). Routledge.

Attah

N. E.

(2013). Contesting exclusion in a multi-ethnic state: Rethinking ethnic nationalism in Nigeria: Social Identities. Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 19(5), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2013.835515

Béteille

(1998). The idea of indigenous people. Current Anthropology, 39(2), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1086/204717

Eller

J. D.

(1999). From culture to ethnicity to conflict: An anthropological perspective on international ethnic conflict. The University of Michigan Press.

Gill

(1885). Man’s ancestry. Science, 6(134), 162–163. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-6.134.162

Greene

(2004). Social identity theory and party identification. Social Science Quarterly, 85(1), 136–153. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955932

Ingersoll

R. G.

(1899). What is religion? Phoenix Publishing.

Joppke

(2018). Culturalizing religion in Western Europe: Patterns and puzzles. Social Compass, 65(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768618767962

Kamei

(2004). A history of the Zeliangrong Nagas: From Makhel to Rani Gaidinliu. Spectrum Publications.

10.

M.N.O. (1926). Human ancestry and other essays. n.p.

11.

Mepfhü-o

(2016). Conversion: Perception of the Christian ‘self’ and the ‘other’. Asian Ethnicity, 17(3), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2015.1091652

12.

Newmei

(2010). Dynamics of ethnicity: State, development and ideneities in N.E. India with special reference to the ZeliangrongNagas. In Tiba

Th. R.

(Ed.), Shakespeare

(1908). Scheduled Tribes of North-East India and development (pp. 189–216). B. R. Publishing Corporation.

13.

Raman

, & Pathak

(2018, March 28). History is not written by committees but by individual historians, says Romila Thapar. The Hindu. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/history-is-not-written-by-committees-but-by-individual-historians/article23366668.ece

14.

Shakespeare

(1908). Review, The Meitheis by T. C. Hodson. Man, 8(1908), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2839445

15.

Tajfel

, & Turner

J. C.

(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel

& Austin

W. G.

, (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 276–293). Nelson-Hall.

16.

Thapar

(2003). The Penguin history of early India: From the origins to AD 1300. Penguin Books.

17.

Van Gennep

(1960). The rites of passage. ( Vizedom

M. B.

& Caffee

G. L.

, Trans.; Introduction by Kimball

Solon T.

). The University of Chicago Press.

18.

Ward

(2003). The evolution of human origins. American Anthropologist, 105(1), 77–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3567315