The objective of this article is twofold: first, to examine the meaning of predatory organised crime (POC), which is defined according to the network governance theory, and, second, to identify the key elements that POC groups need in order to start, grow and expand. POC is a type of organised crime that occurs mostly in developing countries and that feeds on fraud, financial blackmail and shakedowns. This practice imposes heavy financial costs and physical dangers on legal businesses and represents the most detrimental hindrances to the economic growth. The network governance theory helps explain the necessity of flexible organisational structures in a global, fast-changing world. A key finding in this analysis is that POC groups tend to be successful, thanks to network governance; they practice a form of co-ordination characterised by informal social systems rather than by bureaucratic structures within groups and formal contractual relationships between them.
Aguilar-MillanS., FoltzJ.E., JacksonJ., & ObergA. (2008). The globalization of crime.Futurist, 42(6), 41–50.
3.
AndersonM., & GunnarsonC. (Eds). (2003). Development and structural change in Asia-Pacific: Globalizing miracles or end of a model?New York: Routledge.
4.
AndresenM.A., & KinneyJ.B. (Eds). (2012). Patterns, prevention, and geometry of crime. New York: Routledge.
5.
AcevedoB., & CommonR. (2006). Governance and the management of networks in the public sector: Drugs policy in the United Kingdom and the case of cannabis reclassification.Public Management Review, 8(3), 395–414.
6.
BalfourD.L., & GrubbsJ.W. (2000). Character, corrosion and the civil servant: The human consequences of globalization and the new public management.Administrative Theory and Praxis, 22(3), 570–84.
7.
BaylisJ., SmithS., & OwensP. (Eds). (2014). The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
BoydE., & FolkeC. (Eds). (2011). Adapting institutions: Governance, complexity and social-ecological resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BrewerR. (2014). Policing the waterfront: Networks, partnerships and the governance of port security. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
BurnS.M. (2004). Groups: Theory and practice.Toronto: Thomson-Wadsworth.
11.
CastellsM. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
12.
ChengA.T. (1997). Taiwan’s dirty business.AsiaInc. Retrieved 12December2013, from http://www.asia-inc.com/index.php?articleID=1162
CockayneJ., & LupelA. (2009). Conclusion: From iron fist to invisible hand: Peace operations, organized crime and intelligent international law enforcement.International Peacekeeping, 16(1), 151–68.
15.
ColeB. (2006). Conflict, terrorism, and the media in Asia. London: Routledge.
16.
CoxR.W. (1987). Production, power and world order: Social forces in the making of history. New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
CresseyD.A. (1969). Theft of the nation: The structure and operations of organized crime in America. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
DaviesJ.S. (2011). Challenging governance theory: From networks to hegemony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
EcclesR.G. (1981). The quasifirm in the construction industry.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2(4), 335–57.
20.
FenwickM., Van UytselS., & WrbkaS. (Eds). (2013). Networked governance, transnational business and the law. New York: Springer.
21.
FinckenauerJ.O. (2004). The Russian mafia.Society, 41(5), 61–64.
22.
FisherK. (2013). Moral accountability and international criminal law: Holding agents of atrocity accountable to the world. New York: Routledge.
23.
Foreign Policy. (2010). The 2009 Failed States Index.Foreign Policy, 40, 10–15.
24.
FrisbyT. (1998). The rise of organized crime in Russia: Its roots and social significance.Europe-Asia Studies, 50(1), 27–49.
25.
GerlachM.L. (1992). The Japanese corporate network: A blockmodel analysis.Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 105–39.
26.
GodsonR., & OlsonW.J. (1995). International organized crime.Society, 32(2), 18–29.
27.
GoldsmithS., & EggersW.D. (2004). Governing by network. Washington, DC: Brookings.
28.
GounevP., & BezlovT. (2009). Study on member states’ national policies and approaches in dealing with the link between organized crime and corruption. Sofia: Center for the Study of Democracy.
29.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
30.
GranovetterM. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In NohriaN., & EcclesR.G. (Eds), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 25–56). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
31.
HammM. (2007). Terrorism as crime:From Oklahoma city to Al-Qaeda and beyond. New York: New York University Press.
32.
HarperC., & JonesN. (2011). Impacts of economic crises on child well-being.Development Policy Review, 29(5), 511–26.
33.
HazenJ.M. (2013). What rebels want: Resources and supply networks in wartime. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34.
HolstiK.J. (2004). Taming the sovereigns: Institutional change in international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
JarilloJ.C. (1988). On strategic networks.Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31–41.
36.
JonesC., HesterlyW.S., & BorgattiS.P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms.Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–45.
37.
KattoulasV. (2002). The Yakuza recession.Far Eastern Economic Review, 165(2), 12–19.
38.
KettnerP.M., MoroneyR.M., & MartinL.L. (2008). Designing and managing programs: An effectiveness-based approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
39.
KimT.K., & ZurloK. (2008). How does economic globalisation affect the welfare state? Focusing on the mediating effect of welfare regimes.International Journal of Social Welfare, 18(2), 130–41.
40.
KingC. (2010). Extreme politics: Nationalism, violence, and the end of Eastern Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
KraulC., ConnellR., & LopezR. (2005, June18). Nations address gang violence. Los Angeles Times, p. A9.
42.
LemieuxF. (2010). International police cooperation: Emerging issues, theory and practice. New York: Willan.
43.
LundeP. (2006). Organized crime:An inside guide to the world’s most successful industry. New York: Dorling Kindersley.
44.
MariottiS., & CainaracaG.C. (1986). The evolution of transaction governance in the textile clothing industry. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7(4), 354–74.
45.
MilesR.E., & SnowC.C. (1986). Organizations: New concepts for new forms.California Management Review, 28(3), 62–73.
46.
MorselliC. (2013). Crime and networks. New York: Routledge.
47.
MuncieJ. (2005). The globalisation of crime control: The case of youth and juvenile justice.Theoretical Criminology, 9(1), 35–64.
48.
NewmanG. (1999). Global report on crime and criminal justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
NohriaN. (1992). Is network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? In NohriaN. & EcclesR.G. (Eds), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 1–22). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
50.
PaoliL. (2003). Mafia brotherhoods: Organized crime, Italian style. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
PhillipsT. (2007). Knockoff: The deadly trade in counterfeit goods. Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page.
52.
PioreM.J., & SabelC.F. (1984). The second industrial divide.New York: Basic Books.
53.
PowellW.W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In StawB., & CummingsL.L. (Eds), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 295–336). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
54.
ReichelP.L., & AlbaneseJ.S. (2013). Handbook of transnational crime and justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
55.
RingP.S., & Van de VenA.H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations.Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483–98.
56.
RoeM. (2012). Maritime governance and policy-making. New York: Routledge.
57.
SalamonL.M. (2002). The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. In SalamonL. (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide in the new governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
SchellingT.C. (1971). What is the business of organized crime?The American Scholar, 40(4), 643–652.
59.
SennettR. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. London: W.W. Norton.
60.
ShawV.N. (2003). Within and without national borders: Crimes and deviance in Asia and the Pacific.International Journal of Comparative Criminology, 3(2), 119–148.
61.
ShawV.N. (2008). In a time of rapid social change: Organized crime in Asia and the Pacific.International Journal of Social Inquiry, 1(1), 29–46.
62.
SingerM. (2008). Drugs and development: The global impact on sustainable growth and human rights. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
63.
SmithB.G., Van De MieroopM., GlahnR., & LaneK. (2002). Crossroads and cultures, combined volume: A history of the world’s peoples. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
64.
SnowC.C., MilesR.E., & ColemanH.J., Jr. (1992). Managing 21st century network organizations.Organizational Dynamics, 20(3), 5–20.
65.
SoothillK. (1996). The growth of the serial killer industry: A study of the Asia Pacific rim region.Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 6(1), 73–83.
66.
StiglitzJ.E. (2006). Making globalization work. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
67.
SunY. (1999). Reform, state, and corruption: Is corruption less destructive in China than in Russia?Comparative Politics, 32(1), 1–20.
68.
SungH.E. (2004). State failure, economic failure, and predatory organized crime: A comparative analysis.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(2), 111–29.
69.
The Economist. (2000). Business in difficult places: Risky returns.The Economist, 158, pp. 85–88.
70.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2005). Legislative guides for the implementation of the United Nations convention against transnational organized crime and the protocols thereto. New York: United Nations Publication.
71.
von GrebmerK., NestorovaB., QuisumbingA., FertzigerR., FritschelH., Pandya-LorchR., et al. (2009). 2009 Global Hunger Index: The challenge of hunger: Focus on financial crisis and gender inequality. Dublin: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
72.
WilliamsonO.E. (1994). Transaction cost economics and organization theory. In SmelserN.J., & SwedbergR. (Eds), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 77–107). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
73.
WinnT.S. (1824). Emancipation: Practical advice to British slave-holders, with suggestions for the general improvement of West India affairs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Library.
74.
World Bank. (2006). Annual report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
