Ronald Coase has been a vigorous critic of mainstream economic theory, arguing that it is unrealistic and that a good theory is realistic. The attributes "realistic" and "unrealistic" appear in three senses at least in Coase: one related to narrow ness and breadth; another related to abstracting from particularities (and the issue of "blackboard economics"); and the third related to correspondence with the legal. This does not yet make Coase an advocate of realism. It is therefore separately argued that each of the three kinds of "realisticness" as a property of theories is consistent with realism as a theory of theories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boland, Lawrence.1979. A critique of Friedman's critics. Journal of Economic Literature17:503-22.
2.
. 1982. The foundations of economic method. London: Allen and Unwin.
3.
Caldwell, Bruce.1992. Hayek the falsificationist? A refutation. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology10:1-15.
4.
Coase, R.H.1937. The nature of the firm. Economica4 (n.s.): 386-405.
5.
_ 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics3:1-44.
6.
_. 1974. The lighthouse in economics. Journal of Law and Economics17:357-76.
7.
_. 1978. Economics and contiguous disciplines. Journal of Legal Studies7:201-11.
8.
_. 1988a. The firm, the market, and the law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
_. 1988b. The firm, the market, and the law. In The firm, the market, and the law, edited by R. H. Coase, 1-31. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
_. 1988c. How should economists choose? In Ideas, their origins, and their consequences, 63-79. Washington, DC : American Enterprise Institute.
11.
_. 1988d. Industrial organization: A proposal for research. 1972. Reprint, in The firm, the market, and the law, edited by R. H. Coase.Chicago : University of Chicago Press (page references are to reprint edition).
12.
_. 1988e. The marginal cost controversy. Economica13 (n.s.),
13.
1946 . Reprint, in The firm, the market, and the law, edited by R. H. Coase.Chicago: University of Chicago Press (page references are to reprint edition).
14.
_. 1993a. The institutional structure of production. American Economic Review82,
15.
1993 . Reprint, in The nature of the firm. Origins, evolution, and development, edited by Oliver E. Williamson and Sidney G. Winter, 227-35. Oxford : Oxford University Press (page references are to reprint edition).
16.
_. 1993b. The nature of the firm: Influence. In The nature of the firm. Origins, evolution, and development, edited by Oliver E. Williamson and Sidney G. Winter, 61-74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
_. 1993c. The nature of the firm: Meaning. In The nature of the firm. Origins, evolution, and development, edited by Oliver E. Williamson and Sidney G. Winter, 48-60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
_. 1993d. The nature of the firm: Origin. In The nature of the firm. Origins, evolution, and development, edited by Oliver E. Williamson and Sidney G. Winter, 34-47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
_. 1994. Essays on economics and economists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Cohen, Joshua.1995. Samuelson's operationalist-descriptivist thesis . Journal of Economic Methodology2:53-78.
21.
Foss, Nicolai.1994. The two Coasian traditions. Review of Political Economy6:37-61.
22.
Hirsch, Abraham, and Neil de Marchi.1990. Milton Friedman. Economics in theory and practice. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
23.
Hutchison, Terence.1981. The politics and philosophy of economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
Lawson, Tony.1989. Abstraction, tendencies and stylised facts: A realist approach to economic analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics13:59-78.
25.
Mäki, Uskali.1989. On the problem of realism in economics. Ricerche Economiche43:176-98.
26.
Reprint, in The Philosophy and Methodology of Economics, edited by Bruce Caldwell.Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
27.
_. 1990. Mengerian economics in realist perspective. History ofpolitical economy22 (Suppl.): 289-310.
28.
_. 1992a. On the method of isolation in economics. Idealization IV: Intelligibility in science, edited by Craig Dilworth, special issue of Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities26:319-54.
29.
_. 1992b. Friedman and realism. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology10:171-95.
30.
_. 1992c. The market as an isolated causal process: A metaphysical ground for realism. In Austrian economics: Tensions and new developments, edited by Bruce Caldwell and Stephan Boehm, 35-59. Boston: Kluwer.
31.
_. 1993a. Isolation, idealization and truth in economics. Idealization in economics, edited by Bert Hamminga and Neil de Marchi, special issue of Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities38:147-68.
32.
_. 1993b. Why a realist economist needs unrealistic assumptions . Paper presented in January at the Annual Conference of the American Economic Association, Anaheim.
33.
_. 1994a. Reorienting the assumptions issue. In New developments in economic methodology, edited by Roger Backhouse, 236-56. London: Routledge .
34.
_. 1994b. The nature of economics: The case of Coase. University of California at Berkeley. Mimeographed.
35.
_. 1996. Scientific realism and some peculiarities of economics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science169:425-45.
36.
_. 1997a. Against Posner against Coase against theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(3):475-95.
37.
_. 1997b. The problem of social Coase: Between regulation and free market in economic methodology. In Coasean economics, edited by Steven Medema, 249-69. Boston : Kluwer
38.
_. 1997c. Universals and the Methodenstreit: A re-examination of Carl Menger's conception of economics as an exact science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 28(3):475-95.
39.
Masten, Scott E.1993. A legal basis for the firm. In The nature of the firm. Origins, evolution, and development, edited by Oliver E. Williamson and Sidney G. Winter, 196-212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Medema, Steven.1994. R. H. Coase. London: Macmillan.
41.
Posner, Richard A.1993a. The new institutional economics meets law and economics . Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics149:73-87.
42.
_. 1993b. Ronald Coase and methodology. Journal of Economic Perspectives7:195-210.
43.
Robinson, Joan.1993. The economics of imperfect competition. London: Macmillan.
44.
Stigler, George J., and Kenneth E. Boulding, eds. 1952. Readings on price theory. Chicago: Irwin.
45.
Wallis, John, and Douglass North.1986. Measuring the transaction sector in the American Economy, 1870-1970. In Long-term factors in American economic growth, edited by S. L. Engerman and R. E. Gallman.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
Williamson, Oliver E., and Sidney G. Winter, eds. 1993. The nature of the firm. Origins, evolution, and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
Wong, Stanley.1973. The F-twist and the methodology of Paul Samuelson . American Economic Review63:312-25.
