Popper's thesis that the growth of knowledge lies in the emergence of problems out of criticism and takes place in an autonomous world of products of the human mind (his so-called world-3) raises two questions: (1) Why does criticism lead to new problems, and (2) Why can only a limited number of tentative solutions arise at a given time? I propose the following answer: Criticism entails an overlooked evolutionary world-3 mechanism, namely, the migration of piece meal conceptual schemes from one research tradition to another. Popper by passed the questions above because he relied very heavily on the selective power of criticism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bartley, W.W., III.1976. The philosophy of Karl Popper. Part I: Biology & evolutionary epistemology. Philosophia6(3-4):463-94.
Bloor, D.1976. Knowledge and social imagery. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
4.
Brooks, D.R.1992. Incorporating origins into evolutionary theory . In Understanding origins, edited by F. J. Varela and J.P. Dupuy.Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5.
Campbell, D.T.1960. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review67:380-400.
6.
———. 1974. Evolutionary epistemology. In The philosophy of Karl Popper, edited by P. A. Schilpp.LaSalle, IL: Open Court .
7.
De Mey, M.1980. The interaction between theory and data in science . In The social process of scientific investigation. Sociology of sciences , vol. 4, edited by K. Knorr, R. Krohn, and R. Whitley.Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
8.
Dobzhansky, T.1973. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher, March, pp. 125-9.
9.
Driesch, H.1914. The history and theory of vitalism. London: Macmillan.
10.
————. 1929. The science and philosophy of the organism, 2d. ed. London: Black .
11.
Forman, P.1971. Weimar culture, causality and quantum theory, 1918-1927. Adaptation by German physicists and mathematicians to a hostile intellectual environment. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences3:1-115.
12.
Freudenthal, G.1979. How strong is Dr. Bloor's "strong programme"? Studies in history and philosophy of science10(1):67-83.
13.
Goodwin, B.C.1984. Changing from an evolutionary to a generative paradigm in biology. In Evolutionary theory: Paths into the future, edited by J. W. Pollard.London : John Wiley.
14.
————. 1989. A structuralist research programme in developmental biology . In Dynamical structures in biology, edited by B. C. Goodwin and A. Shibatani.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
15.
Guimaraes, R.C.1991. Linguística de interaçoes moleculares. Transformaçao (Sao Paulo) 14:123-37.
16.
———. 1992. Systemic approaches in genetics. Ciência e Cultura44(5):314-9.
17.
Jarvie, I.C.1979. Laudan's problematic progress and the social sciences . Philosophy of the Social Sciences9:484-97.
18.
Kauffman, S.A.1985. Self-organization, selective adaptation, and its limits: A new pattern of inference in evolution and development. In Evolution at a crossroads: The new biology and new philosophy of science , edited by D. J. Depew and B. H. Weber.Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
19.
————. 1991. Antichaos and adaptation. Scientific American265(August):64-70.
20.
————. 1992. Origins of order in evolution: Self-organization and selection . In Understanding origins, edited by F. J. Varela and J. P. Dupuy.Dordrecht: Kluwer .
21.
Kuhn, T.1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
———. 1970. Reflections on my critics. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Lakatos, I.1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge , edited by I. Lakatos and A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
24.
———. 1971. History of science and its rational reconstructions . In Boston studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 8, edited by R. C. Buck and R. S. Cohen.Dordrecht: Reidel.
25.
Laudan, L.1977. Progress and its problems. Towards a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Lorenz, K.1973. Behind the mirror. A search for a natural history of human knowledge. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27.
Mayr, E.1988. Toward a new philosophy of biology. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press .
28.
Monod, J.1972. Chance and necessity. London : Collins.
29.
Munz, P.1985. Our knowledge of the growth of knowledge. Popper or Wittgenstein ? London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Originally in Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14[1985]:195-238)
30.
———. 1987. Bloor 's Wittgenstein or the fly in the bottle . Philosophy of the Social Sciences17:67-96.
31.
————. 1987. Philosophy and the mirror of Rorty. In Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge , edited by G. Radnitzky and W. W. Bartley III.La Salle, IL: Open Court.
32.
———. 1993. Philosophical Darwinism. On the origin of knowledge by means of natural selection. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
33.
Pardini, M.I., and R.C. Guimaraes.1992. A systemic concept of the gene. Revista Brasileira de Genética15(3):713-21.
34.
Popper, K.1987. Natural selection and the emergence of mind. In Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge , edited by G. Radnitzky and W. W. Bartley III.La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Rorty, R.1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
37.
Spemann, H., and O. Schotté.1932. Naturwissenschaften20:463.
38.
Stadler, M., and P. Kruse.1990. Cognitive systems as self-organizing systems. In Selforganization. Portrait of a scientific revolution , edited by W. Krohn, G. Kuppers, and H. Nowotny.London: Kluwer.
39.
Stonier, T.1990. Information and the internal structure of the universe. An exploration into information physics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
40.
Tapper, R.1989. Changing messages in the genes. New Scientist21(March):53-6.
41.
Thompson, D.A.W.1917. On growth and form. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
42.
Waddington, C.H.1952. How do adaptations occur? The Listener48:805-6.
43.
————. 1987. Bloor's Wittgenstein or the fly in the bottle. Philosophy of the Social Sciences17:67-96.
44.
———. 1957. The strategy of the genes. London: Allen & Unwin.
45.
Watson, J.D., N.H. Hopkins, J.W. Roberts, J.A. Steiz, & A. Weiner.1987. Molecular biology of the gene, 4th ed. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings .
46.
Webster, G., and B. Goodwin.1981. History and structure in biology . Perspectives in Biology and Medicine25(Autumn):39-62.
47.
———. 1982. The origin of species: A structuralist approach . Journal of Social and Biological Structures5:15-47.
48.
Weismann, A.1904. The evolution theory. London : Arnold.
49.
Yanofsky, C.1967. Gene structure and protein structure. Scientific American216(May):80-94.
