The systematic philosophical foundation for Jean-François Lyotard's postmodern and post-Marxist politics is described. The central principle of the right to create different "phrases" is uncovered and examined. The political consequences of this philosophical system are explored, leading to the conclusion that Lyotard's commitment to difference leads to political indifference. The philosophical roots of this indifference are detailed in Lyotard's Cartesian starting point and his analysis of Holocaust revisionism. This analysis reveals an idealist basis to Lyotard's philosophy of difference. Lyotard's concept of difference is compared to that of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bauman, Z.1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge : Polity.
2.
Bennington, G.1988. Lyotard: Writing the event. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
3.
Butler, J.1991. Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of "postmodernism ." Praxis International11(2):150-65.
4.
Carroll, D.1984. Rephrasing the political with Kant and Lyotard: From aesthetic to political judgements. Diacritics14(3):74-89.
5.
Di Stefano, C.1990. Dilemmas of difference: Feminism, modernity and postmodernism . In Feminism/Postmodernism, edited by L. Nicholson, 63-72. New York: Routledge .
6.
Feral, J.1980. The powers of difference. In The future of difference, edited by H. Eisenstein and A. Jardine, 88-94. London : Rutgers University Press.
7.
Flax, J.1987. Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory . Signs12(4):621-43.
8.
—. 1990. Thinking fragments: Psychoanalysis, feminism and postmodernism in the contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Harvey, D.1989. The condition of postmodernity. Oxford : Blackwell.
10.
Hekman, S.1990. Gender and knowledge: Elements of a postmodern feminism . Oxford: Polity.
11.
Jardine, A.1985. Gynesis: Configurations of women and modernity . Ithaca: Cornell University Press .
12.
Jordan, T.1994. Reinventing revolution: Value and difference in new social movements and the left. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
13.
—. 1995. Collective bodies: Raving and the politics of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. Body and Society1(1):125-144.
14.
Knight, S.1980. Form and ideology in crime fiction. London: Macmillan.
15.
Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe.1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
16.
Lyotard, J.-F.1979. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge . Manchester: Manchester University Press.
17.
—. 1983. The differend: Phrases in dispute. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
18.
—. 1984. Interview. Diacritics14(3):16-21.
19.
—. 1986. The postmodern explained to children: Correspondence 1982-1985 . Sydney: Power Institute of Fine Arts.
20.
—. 1988. Peregrinations: Law, form, event. New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
Lyotard, J.-F., and J. Thebaud.1985. Just gaming. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
22.
Mouffe, C.1993. The return of the political. London : Verso.
23.
Nicholson, L., ed. 1990. Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
24.
Rowbotham, S.1990. The past is before us: Feminism in action since the 1960s . Harmondsworth : Penguin .
25.
Rowson, M.1990. The wasteland. London: Penguin.
26.
Abbeele, G. VanDen.1984. Up against the wall: The stage of judgement. Diacritics14(3):90-99.
Bennington, G., and R. Young.1987. Introduction: Posing the question. In Post-structuralism and the question of history, edited by D. Attridge, G. Bennington , and R. Young, 1-11. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
32.
Butler, J.1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity . London: Routledge.
—. 1990. Heidegger, art and politics: The fiction of the political . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
50.
Lash, S.1988. Discourse or figure. Postmodernism: Theory, Culture and Society5(2-3):311-36.
51.
Lindsay, C.1984. Experiments in postmodern dialogue. Diacritics14(3):52-63.
52.
Lyotard, J.-F.1972. Energumen capitalism. In Anti-Oedipus , edited by S. Lotringer, 116-35. New York: Semiotext(e).
53.
—. 1973. Driftworks. New York: Semiotext(e).
54.
—. 1982. The sign of history. In Post-structuralism and the question of history, edited by G. Attridge, G. Bennington, and R Young, 162-81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
—. 1983. Presentations. In Philosophy in France today, edited by A. Montefiore, 116-35. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
56.
—. 1986. Defining the postmodern. In Postmodernism: ICA documents 4, edited by L. Appignanesi , 6-7. London: ICA.
57.
—. 1989. The inhuman: Reflections on time. Cambridge: Polity.
58.
Montefiore, A., ed. 1983. Philosophy in France today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Patton, P.1983. Marxism in crisis: No difference. In Beyond Marxism? Interventions after Marx, edited by J. Allen and R Patton, 47-72. Leichardt, NSW: Interventions.
60.
Readings, B.1991. Introducing Lyotard: Art and politics. London: Routledge.
61.
Reijen, V van, and D. Veerman.1988. An interview with Jean-François Lyotard . Postmodernism : Theory, Culture and Society5(2-3):277-309.
62.
Tress, D.1988. Comment on Flax's "Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory." Signs14(1):196-200.
63.
Turner, B., ed. 1990. Theories of modernity and postmodernity. London: Sage.
64.
Veerman, D.1988. Introduction to Lyotard. Postmodernism: Theory, Culture and Society5(2-3):271-275.
65.
VuchtTijssen, L. van.1990. Women between modernity and postmodernity. In Theories of modernity and postmodernity, edited by B. Turner, 147-63. London: Sage.
