Some Problems of Rationality,Understanding,and Universalistic Ethics in the Context of Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action

Abstract

The arguments presented in this discussion point to some problems in the theory of communicative action considered as a starting point for a sociological theory with both normative and explanatory aspirations. It is argued that Habermas's notion of consensus is not sufficiently developed to constitute a foundation of the ethics of public debates; that both social action and communicative action are grounded in social actors' references to the same three worlds, which makes the coordination of actions by means of understanding achieved in speech possible; that the criteria of rationality underlying use of language in the communicative action are ultimately those that are made explicit and consciously worked out in science; and that, finally, it is Parsons' solution to the Hobbesian problem and his concept of social action that provide a possible foundation for universalistic ethics.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno, T. , and M. Horkheimer. 1972. Dialectic of enlightenment New York: Herder and Herder.

Ajzner, Jan. 1988. Modern society as a moral community. Back to Aristotle Paper presented at the 1988 Annual American Sociological Association Meeting, Atlanta, GA, August. (a revised version under preparation for publication)

Browning, Don S., and Francis Schussler Fiorenza, eds. 1992. Habermas, modernity, and public theology. New York : Crossroad.

Calhoun, Craig, ed. 1992. Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1, Reason and the rationalization of society Boston: Beacon.

—. 1987. The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2, Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason Boston : Beacon.

Parsons, Talcott. 1935. Ultimate values in sociological theory International Journal of Ethics 45:282-316.

—. 1937. The structure of social action New York: McGraw-Hill.

—. 1969. Politics and social structure New York : Free Press.

10.

—. 1971. The system of modern societies Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

11.

Peukert, Helmut. 1992. Enlightenment and theology as unfinished projects In Habermas, modernity, and public theology, edited by Don S. Browning and Francis Schussler Fiorenza, 43-65. New York: Crossroad.

12.

Winch, Peter. 1970. Understanding a primitive society In Rationality, edited by Brian Wilson. New York : Harper and Row.