This article explores whether theory-ladenness makes empirical testing an inse cure foundation for objectivity. Specifically, this article uses path diagrams as visual heuristics to assist in (1) developing a parsimonious representation of the traditional empiricist view of empirical testing, (2) showing how the "New Image" view ostensibly threatens the objectivity of science, (3) proposing a unified, realist theory of empirical testing, (4) developing a representation of the unified theory, (5) exploring several potential threats to objectivity, (6) discussing the proposed theory's implications for social science, and (7) adumbrating three foundational premises for scientific realism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, James C., and David W. Gerbing.1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin103 (3): 411-23.
2.
Anderson, Paul F.1983. Marketing, scientific progress and scientific method . Journal of Marketing47 (Fall): 18-31.
3.
—. 1986. On method in consumer research: A critical relativist perspective. Journal of Consumer Research13 (September): 155-73.
4.
Angeles, Peter A.1981. Dictionary of Philosophy. New York : Harper & Row.
5.
Berlin, Brent, and Paul Kay.1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Bernstein, Richard J.1983. Beyond objectivism and relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
7.
Brown, Harold I.1977. Perception theory and commitment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Carnap, Rudolph.1950. Logical foundations ofprobability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Churchland, Paul M.1979. Scientific realism and the plasticity of the mind . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
—. 1988. Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality: A reply to Jerry Fodor. Philosophy of Science55 (June): 167-87.
11.
Cushing, James T.1991. Quantum theory and explanatory discourse: Endgame for understanding? Philosophy of Science58 (September): 337-58.
12.
Davidson, Donald.1973. On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 1973-74: 5-20.
13.
Feyerabend, Paul K.1970. Against method. In Analysis of theories and methods of physics and psychology, edited by M. Radan and S. Wmokur.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
Fodor, Jerry.1984. Observation reconsidered. Philosophy of Science51 (March): 23-43.
15.
—. 1988. "A reply to Churchland's Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality." Philosophy of Science55 (June): 188-98.
16.
Fullerton, Ronald A.1986. Historicism: What it is, and what it means for consumer research. In Advances in consumer research, edited by M. Wallendorf and P. F. Anderson, 431-34. Provo, UT: Association for the Advancement of Consumer Research.
17.
Gergen, Kenneth J.1985. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology . American Psychologist40 (March): 266-75.
18.
Gilman, Daniel.1991. Discussion: The neurobiology of observation. Philosophy of Science58 (September): 496-502.
19.
Goodman, Nelson.1978. Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
20.
Goodman, Robert S., and Evonne Jonas Kruger .1988. Data dredging or legitimate research method? Historiography and its potential for management research . Academy of Management Review13 (April): 315-25.
21.
Greenwood, John D.1990. Two dogmas of neo-empiricism: The "theory-informity" of observation and the Quine-Duhem thesis. Philosophy of Science57 (December): 553-74.
22.
—. 1991. Relations and representations: An introduction to the philosophy of social psychological science. London : Routledge.
23.
Guba, Egon G.1990. The paradigm dialogue. London : Sage.
24.
Hanson, Norwood R1958. Patterns of discovery. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
25.
Heider, E.R., and D.C. Oliver.1972. The structure of the color space in naming and memory for two languages. Cognitive Psychology8:337-54.
26.
Hempel, Carl G.1965. Aspects of scientific explanation. In Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science , edited by Carl G. Hempel, 331-496. New York: Free Press.
27.
—. 1970. Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science . In Foundations of the unity of science, Vol. 8, edited by O. Neurath, 695. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
28.
Hudson, Laurel A., and Julie L. Ozanne . 198. Alternative ways of seeking knowledge in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research14 (March): 508-21.
29.
Kordig, Carl R.1971. The justification of scientific change. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
30.
Kottenhoff, H.1957. Situational and personal influences on space perception with experimental spectacles. Acta Psychologica13:79-97.
31.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Laudan, Larry.1990. Science and relativism. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
33.
Levin, Michael E.1979. On theory-change and meaning-change. Philosophy of Science46:407-24.
34.
Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba.1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
Martin, Laura, and Geoffrey K. Pullman .1991. The great Eskimo vocabulary hoax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
McCloskey, D.N.1985. The rhetoric of economics. Series in the Rhetoric of Human Sciences. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
37.
McMullin, Eman.1984. A case for scientific realism. In Scientific realism, edited by J. Leplin, 8-40. Berkeley : University of California Press.
38.
Meehl, Paul E.1986. What social scientists don't understand. In Metatheory in social science, edited by D. W. Fiske and R. A. Shweder, 315-38. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
39.
Mick, David Glen.1986. Consumer research and semiotics: Exploring the morphology of signs, symbols, and significance. Journal of Consumer Research13 (September): 196-213.
40.
Moberg, D.W.1979. Are there rival, incommensurable theories? Philosophy of Science46:244-62.
41.
Murphy, Nancey.1990. Scientific realism and postmodern philosophy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science41:291-303.
42.
Newton-Smith, W.H.1981. The rationality of science. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
43.
Peter, J. Paul, and Jerry C. Olson.1983. Is science marketing? Journal of Marketing47 (Fall): 111-25.
44.
Phillips, D.C.1990. Subjectivity and objectivity: An objective inquiry . In Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate , edited by E. W. Eisner and A. Peshkin.New York: Teachers College Press.
45.
Popper, Karl R.1959. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper & Row.
46.
—. 1963. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
47.
Sapir, Edward.1949. Selected writings in language, culture, and personality , edited by D. G. Mandelbaum.Berkeley: University of California Press .
48.
Scheffler, Israel.1967. Science and subjectivity. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. —. 1982 . Science and subjectivity. 2d ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
49.
—. 1986. Inquiries: Philosophical studies of language, science, and learning. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
50.
Schlick, Moritz.1934. Uber das Fundament der Erkenntnis. Erkenntnis , Vol. 4, Translation by D. Rynin. In Logical positivism, edited by A. J. Ayer. Glencoe, IL : Free Press.
51.
Shapere, Dudley.1964. The structure of scientific revolution. Philosophical Review73:383-94.
52.
—. 1982. The concept of observation in science and philosophy . Philosophy of Science49 (December): 485-525.
53.
—. 1985. Objectivity, rationality, and scientific change . In Proceedings of the 1984 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, edited by P. Asquith and P. Kitcher, 637-62. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
54.
Siegel, Harvey.1987. Relativism refuted. Dordrecht , Holland: D. Reidel.
55.
Simons, Herbert W.1989. Rhetoric in the human sciences. London : Sage.
56.
Steinfatt, Thomas M.1989. Linguistic relativity: Toward a broader view. In Language, communication, and culture, edited by S. Ting-Toomey and F. Korzenny , 35-78. New-bury Park, CA: Sage.
57.
Suppe, Frederick.1977. The structure of scientific theories. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Whorf, B.L.1956. Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge : MIT Press.
59.
Wylie, Alison.1989. "Archeological cables and tacking: The implications of practice for Bernstein's Options beyond objectivism and relativism." Philosophy of the Social Sciences19:1-18.
