Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

It is argued that conceptual analysis as practiced by the philosophers of ordinary language, is an empirical procedure that relies on a version of Garfinkel's ethnomethodological experiment. The ethnomethodological experiment is presented as a procedure in which the existence and nature of a social norm is demonstrated by flouting the putative convention and observing what reaction that produces in the social group within which the convention is assumed to operate. Examples are given of the use of ethnomethodological experiments, both in vivo and as a thought experiment, in order to demonstrate the existence of otherwise invisible conventions governing human social behavior. Comparable examples are cited from the writings of ordinary language philosophers of ethnomethodological thought experiments designed to demonstrate the existence of linguistic conventions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin, J.L. 1962. How to do things with words Edited by J. O. Urmson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—. 1970. Philosophical papers 2d ed. Edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown, P. , and S. Levinson 1978. Universals in language use: Politeness phenomena In Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction , edited by E. N. Goody Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reissued with corrections, new introduction and new bibliography as Politeness: Some universals of language usage Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Frege, G. 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung uber den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau, 1884. Edition with English translation by J. L. Austin as The foundations of arithmetic: A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number, Oxford University Press, 1950.

Garfinkel, H. 1964. Studies in the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems 11:225-50. Reprinted with revisions in H. Garfinkel, Studies in ethnomethodology, chap 2, Prentice-Hall, 1967.

Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, edited by P. Cole and J. L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press.

—. 1978. Further notes on logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics, edited by P. Cole. New York: Academic Press.

Place, U.T. 1991. Some remarks on the social relativity of truth and the analytic/synthetic distinction. Human Studies 14: 265-85.

10.

Quine, W.v.O. 1969. Epistemology naturalized. In Ontological relativity and other essays New York: Columbia University Press.

11.

Ryle, G. 1949. The concept of mind London: Hutchinson.

12.

Searle, J. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

13.

Smith, D.E. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology Boston: North-eastern University Press.

14.

Verplanck, W.S. 1955. The control of the content of conversation: Reinforcement of statements of opinion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51:668-76.

15.

Wittgenstein, L. 1958. The blue and brown books. Oxford : Blackwell.

The Role of the Ethnomethodological Experiment in the Empirical Investigation of Social Norms and Its Application to Conceptual Analysis

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References