—. 1977. Interests and the growth of knowledgeLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4.
—. 1982. On the implications of a body of knowledgeKnowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization4:95-110
5.
. —. 1983. On the conventional character of knowledge and cognition In Science observed, edited by K. D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay, 19-51. London: Sage.
6.
Bernal, J.D.1939. The social function of scienceNew York: Macmillan.
7.
Bloor, D.1976. Knowledge and social imageryLondon : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8.
Bottomore, T.1956. Some reflections on the sociology of knowledgeBritish Journal of Sociology7:52-58
9.
. Boudon, R.1990. On relativism In Studies on Mario Bunge's Treatise, edited by P. Weingartner and G. Dorn, 229-43. Amsterdam : Rodopi.
10.
Bourdieu, P.1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reasonSocial Science Information14:19-47
11.
. Bourricaud, F.1975. Contre le sociologisme: Une critique et des propositionsRevue française de sociologie16(Suppl.): 583-603.
12.
Bunge, M.1951. What is chance?Science and Society15:209-31
. —. 1989. The popular perception of science in North America In Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada. Ser. 5. Vol. 4:269-80
24.
. —. 1991. A skeptic's beliefs and disbeliefsNew ideas in Psychology9:131-49
25.
. Bunge, M., and R. Ardila.1987. Philosophy of psychologyNew York: Springer-Verlag.
26.
Collins, H.M.1983. An empirical relativist programme in the sociology of scientific knowledge In Science observed, edited by K. D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay, 85-113. London: Sage.
27.
Collins, H.M., and T.J. Pinch.1982. Frames of meaning: The social construction of extraordinary scienceLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28.
Durkheim, E.1972. Selected writings Translated and edited by A. Giddens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Durkheim, E., and M. Mauss. [1903] 1968. De quelques formes primitives de classification In Essais de sociologie , edited by M. Mauss, 162-230. Paris: Edition de Minuit.
30.
Ezrahi, Y.1972. The political resources of American science In Sociology of science: Selected readings, edited by B. Barnes, 211-30. London: Penguin .
31.
Feyerabend, R.K.1975. Against methodLondon: New Left.
32.
Fiske, D. W., and R. A. Shweder, eds. 1986. Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities.Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Galbraith, J.K.1987. A history of economicsLondon : Hamilton.
34.
Gieryn, T.F.1982. Relativist/constructivist programmes in the sociology of science: Redundance and retreatSocial Studies of Science12:279-97
35.
. Goldsmith, D., ed. 1977. Scientists confront Velikovsky. Papers from an AAAS Symposium.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36.
Goodman, N.1978. Ways of world-makingIndianapolis, IN: Hackett.
37.
Habermas, J.1971. Toward a rational societyLondon : Heinemann.
38.
Heidegger, M. [1953] 1987. Einführung in die Metaphysik5th ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
39.
Hesse, M.1980. Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of scienceBrighton: Harvester.
40.
Hirschman, A.O.1981. Essays in trespassing: Economics to politics and beyondCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Husserl, E. [1931] 1960. Cartesian meditationsThe Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
42.
Jarvie, I.C.1984. Rationality and relativismLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
43.
Knorr-Cetina, K.D.1981. The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of scienceOxford: Pergamon.
44.
—. 1983. The ethnographic study of scientific work: Towards a constructivist interpretation of science In Science observed , edited by K. D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay, 115-39. London: Sage.
45.
Krohn, R.G.1980. Toward the empirical study of scientific practice In Sociology of the sciences yearbook. Vol. 4, edited by K. D. Knorr, R. G. Krohn, and R. Whitley, vii-xxv. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
46.
Kuhn, T.S.1962. The structure of scientific revolutionsChicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Kurtz, P., ed. 1985. A skeptic's handbook of parapsychology.Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
48.
Latour, B.1980. Is it possible to reconstruct the research process? Sociology of a brain peptide In Soctology of the sciences yearbook. Vol. 4, edited by R. G. Krohn, 53-76. Dordrecht : D. Reidel.
49.
—. 1983. Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world In Science observed, edited by K. D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay, 141-70. London: Sage.
50.
—. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through societyCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
—. 1988. A relativistic account of Einstein's relativitySocial Studies of Science18:3-44
52.
. Latour, B., and S. Woolgar.1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific factsLondon: Sage .
53.
Lukács, G. [1923] 1971. History and class-consciousnessCambridge: MIT Press.
54.
Livingston, P.1988. Literary knowledgeIthaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
55.
Lynch, M.E.1988. Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciencesSocial Studies of Science18:265-89
56.
. Lynch, M., E. Livingston, and H. Garfinkel.1983. Temporal order in laboratory work In Science observed, edited by K. D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay, 205-38. London : Sage.
Marshall, E.1990. Data sharing: A declining ethic?Science248:952-57
59.
. Merton, R.K.1957. Social theory and social structure Rev. ed. New York: Free Press.
60.
Mulkay, M.1969. Some aspects of cultural growth in the natural sciences In Sociology of science: Selected readings , edited by B. Barnes, 126-42. London: Penguin.
61.
Pinch, T.J.1979a. What does a proof do if it does not prove? In Sociology of the sciences yearbook. Vol. 3 edited by H. Nowotny and H. Rose, 171-215. Dordrecht : D. Reidel.
62.
—. 1979b. Normal explanations of the paranormal: The demarcation problem and fraud in parapsychologySocial Studies of Science9:329-48
63.
. —. 1985. Towards an analysis of scientific observation: The externality of evidential significance of observational reports in physicsSocial Studies of Science15:3-36
64.
. Pinch, T.J., and H.M. Collins.1979. Is anti-science not science? In Sociology of the sciences yearbook. Vol. 3, edited by H. Nowotny and H. Rose, 221-50. Dordrecht : D. Reidel.
65.
—. 1984. Private science and public knowledge: The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of the Claims of the Paranormal and its use of the literatureSocial Studies of Science14:521-46
Restivo, S.1983. The social relations of physics, mysticism and mathematicsLancaster: D. Reidel.
68.
Robinson, J., and J. Eatwell.1974. An introduction to modern economics Rev. ed. London: McGraw-Hill .
69.
Roll-Hansen, N.1983. The death of spontaneous generation and the birth of the gene: Two case studies of relativismSocial Studies of Science13:481-519.
70.
Rorty, R.1979. Philosophy and the mirror of naturePrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71.
Rose, H.1979. Hyper-reflexivity: A new danger for the countermovements In Sociology of the sciences yearbook . Vol. 3, edited by H. Nowotny and H. Rose, 277-89. Dordrecht : D. Reidel.
72.
Rose, H., and S. Rose.1974. "Do not adjust your mind, there is a fault in reality": Ideology in the neurobiological sciences In Social process of scientific development, edited by R. Whitley, 148-71. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
73.
Shweder, R.A.1986. Divergent rationalities In Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities , edited by D. W. Fiske and R. A. Shweder, 163-96. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74.
Siegel, H.1987. Relativism refuted: A criticism of contemporary epistemological relativismBoston: D. Reidel.