It has become extremely questionable whether, in the flux of life, it is a genuinely worthwhile intellectual problem to seek to discover fixed and immutable ideas or absolutes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ApelKarl-Otto (1972) ‘Sprache als Medium der transzendentalen Reflexion’, in StarkeHeinrich (ed.), Sprache und Erkenntnis, Meisenhain am Glan, pp. 1–15.
2.
ApelKarl-Otto (1973) Transformation der Philosophie, Volume II. Frankfurt am Main.
3.
AronRaymond (1953) Die deutsche Soziologie der Gegenwart. Stuttgart.
4.
BarberBernard (1975) ‘Toward a New View of the Sociology of Knowledge’, in CoserLewis (ed.), The Idea of Social Structure. New York, pp. 103–16.
5.
BarnesS. B. (1974) Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London.
6.
CoombsRobert H. (1966) ‘Karl Mannheim, Epistemology and the Sociology of Knowledge’, Sociological Quarterly, 7, 229–33.
7.
MannheimKarl ([1924] 1952) ‘Historicism’, in Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, London, pp. 84–133.
8.
MannheimKarl (1936) Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. New York.
9.
ParsonsTalcott (1936) ‘Review of Alexander von Schelting's Max Weber's Wissenschaftslehre’, American Sociological Review, 1, 675–81.
10.
SpeierHans (1936) ‘Review of Emst Gruenwald's Das Problem einer Soziologie des Wissens’, American Sociological Review, 1, 681–82.
11.
StarkWerner (1958) The Sociology of Knowledge. London.
12.
VeitOtto (1965) ‘Zentralbankpolitik’, in BeckerathErwin (eds.), Handwörterbuch der Sozialwissehaften, Stuttgart, pp. 423–34.
13.
WalterBenjamin (1967) ‘The Sociology of Knowledge and the Problem of Objectivity’, in GrossLlewellyn (ed.), Sociological Theory: Inquiries and Paradigms. New York, pp. 335–57.
